Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just to add my few cents to the debate:D

I have a Greddy plenum and have found gains across the board with it. Maybe it's due to my intercooler pipe setup, or maybe due to the plenum it's hard to know. I have better throttle response, more mid-range power, and it doesn't run out of puff at the top-end till much later. In WA my stock turbo made the most power from all the other stock turbo's, and the major difference was the plenum.

Make of that what you will:D

Very nice !

Anyone ever made over 300rwhp from the stock turbo ? I'm currently at 272rwhp still with stock ECU and for some silly reason i'd rather upgrade everything but the std turbo just as something different to do.

sydneykid, your info is always extremely useful - particularly as i have only theory to back my suggestions, and you have actual bench experience. I already have a greddy plenum on order, so it is going on my car. To begin with i will probably run a adapter to use the factory throttle body, and run 65mm piping to the throttle from the FMIC outlet (it has a 65mm outlet).

I know that there will be flow turbulence behind the throttle when it is cracked open (due to the expansion to 80-90mm) but if anything this should in theory spread/disrupt the airflow a bit and instead of flowing straight to back cylinders (ie. no 5 and 6) there should be better distribution around the front of the plenum.

What do you think?

hi sydneykid, currently on the car is:

*3.5" turbo back

*pod in inclosure

coming is:

*FMIC

*ProfecB spec II

*Greddy intake

next plan:

stage 1:

*Power FC

*Fuel pump

*Injectors

Stage 2:

*HKS GT3040

*HKS 1.2mm head gasket (and any other bits and pieces to support this, obviously)

So i would suppose i'm looking at around 280rwkW (conservative with around 1.2bar)

Hi Ronin 09, list looks OK but I would strongly recommend a set of camshafts, we find the Tomei 256's designed for working with VVT to be great. They don't add too much to the max power (10 or so rwkw's) but we found 30 rwkw in the mid range and brings the turbo on boost quicker. I am also a fan of doing some headwork while the head is off, again not much extra max power but much faster spool up and way better response.

I am not a fan of thick head gaskets, size the conbustion chamber to get the right compression ratio, o'ring the head and use a standard head gasket. That's my preference.

From my memory of the GT3040 compressor flow maps, I don't think you will get to 280 rwkw at 1.2 bar, certainly not without camshafts and port work. More like 1.4 bar with those done and 1.6 without.

What manifold are you going to use the GT3040 on? Wastegate? You will need a Z32 AFM at least, I personally prefer the Q45 AFM, at 90 mm they flow better and match up to the 100 mm GT3040 inlet diameter much nicer and saves using those expensive silicone reducer hoses.

Hope that helps

Sydneykid, thanks for the info there.

I forgot to add that i'm also getting a adjustable exhaust cam sprocket, and i understand that i would idealy better to go with a a set of camshafts - probably best to do the camshafts when the head is off, while the adjustable sprocket is just there to try and bring on boost a little earlier at the moment.

I understand that most people don't like thicker head gaskets, can you ballpark what it would cost to size the comb. chambers and o-ring it? While it is off i would look to clean the ports up too. I know this is probably better and should hold boost with alot more reliability.

The power FC, injectors and pump will be done close to christmas, and i will probably do a Q45 AFM then too. I really want to get the PFC in soon, just so the mixtures are more optimum.

The turbo will be at least 6 months away, as i'm waiting to hear from a new job. It is the plan at the moment, but as we all know, plans change pretty quickly. Ideally i'd like to go with a HKS stainless manifold to suit, with an HKS external wastegate. But as funds allow, i may have a custom exhaust manifold made up by my exhaust shop - they do very good custom work.

Thanks again.

Hi ronin 09, We have found ther Tomei 256's designed for the VVT don't benefit from adjustable camshaft pulleys. Their standard (un adjusted position) is optimal, they obviously did their homework.

Port, polish, size combustion chamber and O'ring head on a 6 cylinder shouldn't be more than $1K.

I am not a fan of HKS stuff, it is simply too expensive for me. I personally don't see the value in the product, but I am only interested in the function not the look. Plus I am not a fan of top mount manifolds, turbos are heavy and sticking them up in the air does nothing for the centre of gravity.

Hope that helps some more

A lot of interesting points brought up in this thread.

Originally posted by Sydneykid

You are right about losing pipework being better for response, it's a worthwhile target.  The important thing here is the volume of air in the pipework, not the length of the pipework.

Volume of pipework and volume of plenum, for those who are moving to a front facing plenum for response, are the important factors. The 80mm vs 63mm comparison is a good one. Another one is the 5L+ most of aftermarket plenums consume vs ~2.75L for the factory one (caluclated, not measured, so may be inaccurate). Not to say 2.75L is ideal, it isn't, but it should perform better from a response point of a view.

(Warning: Uneducated fluid mechanics ahead)

I don't agree with the factory throttle body location. Runners for cylinder 3 & 4 are undoubtly favoured in my opinion. The design just seems too ameaturish to feed air evenly. I don't believe the stock fuel rail can be blamed for cylinder 3 & 4 running lean either. According to a local injector cleaner, the design seems ok and it's not as flawed as, say, one from a wrx (ej20).

Originally posted by Sydneykid

On turbo inlet systems flow bench comparisons are a bit nebulous at best.

I had originally planned to do flow bench tests on the stock plenum to see how good (or poor) its design is, but as you said, flow benches can't be used to test plenums accurately. While its possible to the test how much each individual runner can flow, this figure means little when all 6 runners are in use. The real difficulty is in trying to predict flow after reversion from adjoining inlet tracts cause pulses along the plenum. In truth, its pretty damn difficult without megabuck instrumentation that only engine designers would have.

The only thing I can do is question Nissan's design and try and improve on it. Thats what led me to try a modified factory plenum. I wanted good response with a factory sized turbo with fmic and that meant shorter piping distance, low piping volume, no increase in plenum volume and standard 60mm throttle body. A modified factory plenum would suit very well in this situation. (Before big turbo ppl jump on me, I said stock sized turbo :))

I didn't have a hand in the design of my cut'n'shut (one of GTS-t VSPEC's friends made it), but it does have a bit of thought put into it. Off the top of my head:

- Throttle body isn't mounted perpendicular to the plenum. It enters at an angle so charge disperses against the side wall of the plenum and doesn't favour cylinder 5 & 6 or neglect cylinder 1.

- Wall between throttle plate and cylinder 1 is smoothly radiused to encourage flow.

Should have the piping finished early next week and I'll be keeping a very close eye on the detonation threshold of individual cylinders. I'll call it a success if it gives a noticable increase in response and doesn't increase the tendancy to ping. Extra power is not a goal.

Pic of plenum in attached. Excuse the quality, it was taken with a film camera and scanned poorly.

This is S of S here...

Before I start, I am not trying to shoot you down Granenko. Just one point confused me. IF you can explain exactly why a front facing throttle body is better, please go... I didn't really see any reason it would be from your post... but

Originally posted by Gradenko

I don't agree with the factory throttle body location. Runners for cylinder 3 & 4 are undoubtly favoured in my opinion. The design just seems too ameaturish to feed air evenly.  

Lets put it this way; I reckon having the throttle body closer to all of the cylinders is way more intelligent than having a throttle body close to cylinder 1, but miles away from from 5 and 6, which is what is causing a few people problems with air distribution. Sure #3 and #4 are favoured, but then so is #1 and #2 in a forward facing manifold... but #5 and #6 don't get ANY air... I personally don't see how a forward facing plenum could have any positives - sure, it might shorten the amount of pipework, but maybe not decrease the volume on air in the pipework and plenum chamber. I am no fluid dynamisist (sic?!?!?!) but my in my logic, after some thought (hours and hours), the standard inlet just seems way more efficent. Or maybe I should say the position of the throttle body is more efficent - that way i exclude the modified standard inlets... I also think that Nissan have an R and D budget three times the amount of money I will make in my lifetime..... prolly more. So i think nissan spent more time with inlets, and prolly knew what they were doing. And it seems to work pretty damn fine just the way it is.

BUT, if I have 6 throttle bodies, then hella yeah... but if I had 6 throttle bodies, I would prolly have an RB26, so I wouldn't be changing it - Just found out that the Apexi V-MAX GT-R (did an 8.45 1/4 mile no less) uses the stock inlet - pretty interesting. To add to that, most of the really fast curcuit GT-Rs also use the standard inlet... i don't see a reason to change.

Son of Sydneykid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...