Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is there an available defect list under SA Legislation?

There is so many stories of cops in SA being complete arseholes towards skyline owners, id love to have a list as would everyone else of what is defectable and what isnt.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238896-defect-list-for-sa/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my son got done for a pod filter and fmic and was told to go to regency . i rang regency too book it in they asked what had it been done for they said neither of those items are defectable go too ya nearest police station get them to ring me he gave name and ph number .

we took the car to elizabeth police station told them the story they rang regency next thing they took the defect off without even looking at the car really still charged us 27 bucks tho lol .

trouble is half the coppers dont have a clue what there looking at and so too make themselves look good they slap on a defect and let you and regency sort it out

you can be defected for anything that is not standard on a vehicle.

that was strait from the/A horses mouth.

not to mention the fact that factory-stanard-straight-from-the-showroom-floor cars can be defected too. ie, rx8, eyebrow height.

Even if your car is completely legal they can still send you to regency for a "suspected" defect but that doesn't happen very often to my knowledge.

thats exactly what i got defected on

i was defected on a "suspected suspension damage"

ok guys for those of you that are just of your p plates,any car that comes out gets manufactured with certain specifics,this is called being standard,anything added or modified is called being changed,therefore isnt standard so is deemed to be allegal. its at this point in time when if u want to change the way the car comes out standard,then u need to go get raped in the a## from the government and pay through the nose to get a engineers certificate which states the mod and shows it has been made to a safe and acceptable standard(by certain legal boundaries/rules). Anything modified or changed that has not had this done is therefore running the risk of defect,depending on how the cops day has been,or how you deal with getting pulled over.

A few people have said,itl be ok if you just take it easy they will leave you alone,id love to believe that was true,although anyone thats owned a done up car before knows that you may get away with this for a while,but it just takes that one cop that you havent seen yet,that doesnt like the way you or your car looks,and its regency time thankyou very much. engineer certs cost and arm and a leg,but worth it if you can get one,on that note anyone know one ha ha

The very best thing to happen...ever....was cars being defected for Turbo Timers.

The most dangerous and dumb modification the world has ever seen :)

Why is that??

Not saying your wrong by any means but would like to know why you or anyone else thinks that turbo timers are a waste of time.

turbo timers are legal (and good) for work vehciles that are over 2.5T, such as delivery vehciles, generally diesel, stopping and going all day etc, enables engine to keep running with doors locked etc while delivery man does his 5min job.

on a sports car they are illegal. how dangerous is it, do you think, when you pull up to the fuel pump, car is still running Seven Minutes later cause of a massive hills run, and you decide to fill up the tank anyway because there is now a que behind you........ or a kiddie playing in the car in the driveway, with another kiddie behind the car, once daddy races home from work and jumps into the shower..... think about it.

Not needed for sports cars, slow down for the last 5kms of your trip and dont boost it. Simple.

makes me lol when people drive their cars on the street and just cruising around then let their turbo timer stay on for a few minutes, its so pointless, unless your hills thrashing or on the track ya turbo's just wont get that hot.

Why is that?? Not saying your wrong by any means but would like to know why you or anyone else thinks that turbo timers are a waste of time.

In the case of a major accident where your vehicle is disabled, and you are trapped in said vehicle, the turbo timer will in most cases keep the fuel pump running to ensure that you and your passengers are killed by the resulting Turbo Timer fed fuel inferno - in the instance the initial impact didnt get you in the first place :w00t:

As I tell anyone that asks, if you cant drive quietly for the last 1km or so before you park the car, or cant understand the concept of a cool down lap, you dont have the intelligence and necessary mechanical aptitude to own a turbocharged car. Look at another form of motorised transport rather than adding a Turbo Timer :P

As a side note Turbo Timers are also excellent for car thieves - "Here is my main switched Ignition Wire come get me" :wacko:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...