Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

makes me lol when people drive their cars on the street and just cruising around then let their turbo timer stay on for a few minutes, its so pointless, unless your hills thrashing or on the track ya turbo's just wont get that hot.

i had one on my first car a while ago when turbo timers weren't known and i loved it! when i park up next to the ladies and i turn it off but it's still running they come up to me and tell me my cars is still running and i strike and pose with a french accent and say, oh my doesn't matter because it's the way my car works baby, it's always TURNED ON! :thumbsup: ok it might have gone down like that but it was a good conversation starter

but it was a bit of a wank factor i guess

I got one on the DR, its one you can turn on and off...So its hardly ever turned on and i hardly ever use it, even when i do use it im standing near the car anyways so its kinda pointless exercise haha!!

I don't really see a point to using em really, like has been said if you can't drive your car with mechanical sympthay for the last km or so then you should just give the car away

I've got one built into my alarm but you can't set it for anything under a minute which makes it pointless.

The Nissan Skyline manual for a 32 GTR even says "If you've been driving at 100k's an hour for over 30 minutes, when you come to stop, leave your engine running for 30 seconds"

I've got one built into my alarm but you can't set it for anything under a minute which makes it pointless.

The Nissan Skyline manual for a 32 GTR even says "If you've been driving at 100k's an hour for over 30 minutes, when you come to stop, leave your engine running for 30 seconds"

Ive got one built in also, and its set to the lowest setting. quite frankly i quite like it... if its a cold morning and im stopping at the corner shop before cruising onto someone else, i dont mind the tt letting the car warm up :D As long as the car is in line of sight... I generally dont let it run when im out of visual/audible range... and the keyfob lets me cut the ignition at any point, so i generally hit it while walking away from the car... fixed turbo timers are a bit of a bore but I quite like mine

-D

In the case of a major accident where your vehicle is disabled, and you are trapped in said vehicle, the turbo timer will in most cases keep the fuel pump running to ensure that you and your passengers are killed by the resulting Turbo Timer fed fuel inferno - in the instance the initial impact didnt get you in the first place :)

As I tell anyone that asks, if you cant drive quietly for the last 1km or so before you park the car, or cant understand the concept of a cool down lap, you dont have the intelligence and necessary mechanical aptitude to own a turbocharged car. Look at another form of motorised transport rather than adding a Turbo Timer :D

As a side note Turbo Timers are also excellent for car thieves - "Here is my main switched Ignition Wire come get me" :D

I agree that turbo timers are definitely not a necessity .... but, for the car to still be running after an accident, you have to have ALL these 3 things to happen for a correctly installed turbo timer to activate:

- handbrake needs to be engaged

- car has to be in Park/Neutral at the time the ignition is cut

- the keys have to be taken off the 'On' position

Now, in how many accidents do ALL of the above happen? (And they ALL have to happen for a turbo timer to initialise). Answer = none.

As for telling thieves which wire to start the car, 99.9% of stolen vehicles DON'T have turbo timers, yet they figure out how to hotwire them in 2 seconds flat. Somehow I don't think it makes a lick of difference :D

I agree that turbo timers are definitely not a necessity

+1, i had one on my car when i first got it. and ditched it in favour of driving low rpm for the last 2 minutes of driving.

like craig said, its 1 less thing they can defect u for.

interestingly one of the guys i went to tafe with had a 180sx with a factory turbo timer :D

I got defected for not having a tyre placard and for having a standard blow off valve...

cop also thought my pod filter was a boost controller and told me that he possibly saved my life by taking a defective car off the road..

it is getting beyond a joke... we either need police with proper training or a seperate body that's sole purpose is to deal with road rules, defects etc... like the RTA in sydney. At least that way defects would be more justified and the whole "defect everything, let regency sort them out" attitude can be dropped.

quote

"When selecting aftermarket wheel rims for a motor vehicle, ensure that the offset of the rim does not vary by

more than 13mm from the original rim fitted by the vehicle manufacturer"

i just got my r34 skyline imported and it has a TT installed directly ontop of the steering wheel column.....stupid place to put it i know...

but after reading this thread....its prolly worth disconnecting it and rippin it out...dont ya think?

I'm pretty sure there are a couple of companies that make adr approved cf bonnets. I can't remember if its all carbon or fibeglass with a layer of carbon over the top. A cop would still get ya for it though.

Edit: Had a look at this thread and it be something you'd need to get engineered rather than relying on adr approved products.

In the end they'll give you a defect for what they like so it's more a question of if it will pass regency.

Edited by Eddyfier

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...