Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know of QNX, but I don't think I could be much help to you (I have zero experience with it).

If anything, I imagine you could do a possible create an image of the HD using something like dd, and work with it that way:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dd_(Unix)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238982-anyone-know-qnx/#findComment-4176904
Share on other sites

any reason why Nortons Ghost can't fill the task? or even windows backup?

I really depends on what the file system is and whether Ghost supports it.

A quick google brings up this:

http://quics.qnx.com/cgi-bin/dir_find.cgi?.../os/utils/disk/

and this in particular:

http://quics.qnx.com/cgi-bin/print_des.cgi...X_drive_copy.gz

It will require a bit of unix knowledge to understand and get running, but it's a beginning.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238982-anyone-know-qnx/#findComment-4177604
Share on other sites

the system that this thing is in runs QNX and everything that is attached runs on top of it.

what I need to do is pull this thing - unlock it , dump it and play. I'm working on an alternate image to load back into it on another drive exaclty the same. issue being there WILL be a software difference between the two images. its that difference that I need to compile into a third image so I can test my theory.

ben,

was looking at hd tools to start fiddling with it but considering I only have one copy to start with I'd prefer that someone else imaged this thing. if I lose the data I am literally screwed!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238982-anyone-know-qnx/#findComment-4177809
Share on other sites

the system that this thing is in runs QNX and everything that is attached runs on top of it.

what I need to do is pull this thing - unlock it , dump it and play. I'm working on an alternate image to load back into it on another drive exaclty the same. issue being there WILL be a software difference between the two images. its that difference that I need to compile into a third image so I can test my theory.

ben,

was looking at hd tools to start fiddling with it but considering I only have one copy to start with I'd prefer that someone else imaged this thing. if I lose the data I am literally screwed!

if an image is all you want to literally duplicate the data, master boot records and all the other information there are a few tools that will duplicate the disk without any risk to the existing disk.

1. Norton Ghost - use a commercial dos based version. Version 7 springs to mind. (My Pick)

2. HDClone 3.2 - need an exact duplicate of the HDD for this one. Or at least last time i used it it wouldn't create an ISO or image, but it was free and did the job quite well.

3. Acronis True Disk Image.

I have used all three and all three have their quirks but can do the job of just duplicating the data so that someone else can have a fiddle. I used all three to image ATM Hard drives in the past quite successfully and Norton if by far my favorite.

I can probably hook you up with a Norton Ghost image, what format is the HDD 2.5, 3.5, SATA, PATA, SATA with a connector like you see on HP and some Compaq's? Need more details.

If no-one else will help you I can pop over with my ATM toolkit and laptop and give it a go. We won't frack the HDD the worst that might happen is that the drive is encrypted and you will need some more serious tools.

You got my number if you need me. I can't help yopu with the code but an image should be all too easy.

Edited by Data Queue
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238982-anyone-know-qnx/#findComment-4177938
Share on other sites

ben,

was looking at hd tools to start fiddling with it but considering I only have one copy to start with I'd prefer that someone else imaged this thing. if I lose the data I am literally screwed!

That's a fair call. I know the principle behind what you need to do, but without actual experience I'm really not willing to put my hand up and say I'll do it considering the nature of it all (And I probably don't have the set up to do it either). I would have a call around a few of the data recovery places to see what they can do. The principle is the same.

Once you get an 1:1 image (especially if created using the unix dd program) you can then mount (load) the image up (in linux or similar) and use it as you would a normal drive rather than using the original, burn images to CD's et al.

Recently one of the hardware guys at work needed to do some data recovery and used these guys http://www.datarecoverylabs.com.au/ (they're local in brisbane) and I believe he said they charged $99/h. Which is damn cheap. If it's worth paying that, I'd be giving them a call, as I can't see why they couldn't do what you needed. They'd also provide a much better guarantee.

I'm not familar with ghost or acronis (beyond knowing they're both good at what they do). Because it's QNX, it's most likely running on QNX's proprietary file system (e.g. Not something either Windows or Linux* typically supports). I can foresee that being an issue with both of the above software, unless they're capable of doing a blind 1:1 copy.

* Though I know you can add support for this FS in linux.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238982-anyone-know-qnx/#findComment-4177947
Share on other sites

Recently one of the hardware guys at work needed to do some data recovery and used these guys http://www.datarecoverylabs.com.au/ (they're local in brisbane) and I believe he said they charged $99/h. Which is damn cheap. If it's worth paying that, I'd be giving them a call, as I can't see why they couldn't do what you needed. They'd also provide a much better guarantee.

Good point.

Edited by Data Queue
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238982-anyone-know-qnx/#findComment-4177959
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
×
×
  • Create New...