Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mine is not a daily and i tend to drive hard 90% of the time so i doubt the O2 has much input. Its only had 1 tune on E85 so i'm not concerned (still uses less fuel than my patrol )

I don't see how you can have such little variation in fuel use considering how much extra fuel is needed with ethanol.

Edited by Bond

because mine is a daily/streeter. so it sees a lot of time at cruise.

and it doesn't seem to need all that much extra to give me a lambda of 1 on e-flex

but yes I haven't done a full tank driving it hard 90% of the time. Will find out when i finaly get it onto the track :verymad:

Edit : Also consider 11l/100Km > 14l/100Km as a percentage. My consumption went up 27% Which is crack on ball park for ethanol

techedge will set me back $478 or some shit after GST and freight tho :P

then I gotta get it installed....fark knows where I'll get that done, unless I can somehow just replace my factory o2 sensor with the techedge and plug that into the v44.

i can install it if you want.

Pat, it can do wideband closed loop or use the stock narrow band one.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/10-COLOUR-LED-WIDEB...=item2eb09e11bf

this is the one I've got.

Looks cheap and nasty, but responds fast, is accurate compared to Ed's dyno one. and cheep cheep!

does it have a 0-5v output for the ECU?

http://wbo2.com/2j/default.htm

this one is 411 + delivery if you get the 2j9 + 7200 sensor + LA1 52mm display

thats the updated version of mine and outputs to the ECU flawlessly.

does it have a 0-5v output for the ECU?

http://wbo2.com/2j/default.htm

this one is 411 + delivery if you get the 2j9 + 7200 sensor + LA1 52mm display

thats the updated version of mine and outputs to the ECU flawlessly.

Yeah man that's exactly what I wanted to get....BUT, it's $411 PLUS GST PLUS DELIVERY. They don't count GST in their original prices :) from memory, it came to like $478

Could you please define to me exactly what "closed loop" means in this sense? I keep getting the impression you tell it you want 12:1 AFR, and it will adjust fuel constantly to keep it there....if that's the case, you'd only need to adjust timing when swapping to E85...correct? that doesn't sounds quite right to me, hence my confusion...but it could be the case lol

Closed loop only gets used during idle and cruise, where the ecu looks at the narrowband voltage, which only fluctuates from 0-1v and can only measure between 14-15 AFR... so the ecu keeps the voltage in between 0 and 1 volt by adding and taking out fuel. thus keeping the AFR's at i nice 14.7/1

This is my understanding of it anyway...

narrow band closed loop aims for 0.5v which is 14.7:1 and is only used during light load/cruise, you can not use it to accurately aim for other ratios much beyond that, wideband closed loop aims for what ever afr you tell it to and can work even when you are using 100% throttle @ 7000rpm if you want.

if you want i can give you the map from my ECU Pat and you can take a look.

wideband closed loop would be awesome! is that what your gonna be running? I'm very much limited to what NIStune can do.

I'll be getting the software tomorrow when I'm "hard at work" and have my laptop there hehehe

so i'll grab it off ya then. cheers!

wideband closed loop would be awesome! is that what your gonna be running? I'm very much limited to what NIStune can do.

I'll be getting the software tomorrow when I'm "hard at work" and have my laptop there hehehe

so i'll grab it off ya then. cheers!

i have been running it for the past 2 years, you can get some excelent cruise econ running 15.5-16:1 with very low throttle

i just emailed the file to you as i dont have them at work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around with a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
    • Yep, this bit another local owner. I caught it before putting the transmission back into the car, what I noticed was the pressure plate fingers weren't flat and even. It's more obvious with the pull style clutch because the throwout bearing ring was visibly not flat once everything is put together. Nismo should really update their instructions to call out this specific detail. I'm not even sure the clutch as-shipped orients everything properly.
    • It ended up being that orientation of the float hub in relation to the clutch disk, when I installed it, I heard a loud click and being stupid, I decided to not take it a part and check it. The hub didn't properly align with the clutch disk and was causing the issue. Definitely an odd one! Dahtone Racing was able to fix me right up, stand up blokes!      
    • Right, but I'm saying on the stock ECU measured airmass from the MAF is no higher than stock. So it's accounting for the higher flow rate iso-manifold pressure. You just have to keep turning down the boost until you're within the stock tune's load scale. If you run off the end there's no telling what will happen. This does mean there's zero benefit to the turbos you're running vs stock, if anything it's just a straight downgrade because the transient response is worse, you don't even get the ECU's boost solenoid helping to pull the wastegate closed during initial spool, and peak power is only whatever the factory map can give you before you hit the R&R corner. On a -9 I would bet that you would have to change out the wastegate spring once you have a real ECU and you're tuning it for real. I'm not saying this is a remotely ideal state of affairs, it's just a way to keep it driveable until you can get a proper tune done.
×
×
  • Create New...