Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok so today i removed the airbox in the hopes of fitting my spare apexi pod filter. it didnt fit :bunny:

anyway, so i put it all back together again, no parts left over. kicked the engine over and it started. great!

went inside, came back a few hours later to leave, and took off and noticed the check engine light was on! ahh stupid me, i didnt plug in the AFM again!!

so i plugged it in again, kicked it over, light didnt go off. had to drive anyway, even with the light on, the car drives normally! but the light is pissing me off

anyone know how to get rid of it?? its platered over the tv screen too with some japanese writing. if its not related to this, could it be the service interval thingo??

if only there was an english version of this tv stuff :banana:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239287-m35-check-engine-light/
Share on other sites

think this might have been covered in the V35 forum, remember reading something a while back, have a scan/post there if no luck here. Also, send me the screenshot and i could translate it if you think it is not related to the AFM.

ok so today i removed the airbox in the hopes of fitting my spare apexi pod filter. it didnt fit :bunny:

anyway, so i put it all back together again, no parts left over. kicked the engine over and it started. great!

went inside, came back a few hours later to leave, and took off and noticed the check engine light was on! ahh stupid me, i didnt plug in the AFM again!!

so i plugged it in again, kicked it over, light didnt go off. had to drive anyway, even with the light on, the car drives normally! but the light is pissing me off

anyone know how to get rid of it?? its platered over the tv screen too with some japanese writing. if its not related to this, could it be the service interval thingo??

if only there was an english version of this tv stuff :banana:

Ahhh soon. There will be the English translation soon.....

The service interval notice is a green sign that says "pit". So if that is what is on your screen don't worry about it.

I think there is a thread somewhere about how to reset the fault codes.

the other option instead of going the pod filter is to fit the K&N filter and at the fron of the air box, there is a piece that can be removed that opens up the air box to more cold air from under the front of the bonnet. You can buy the part from Nissan (power duct) or make your own as I did. The part is $180.

Cheers

Andy

hahah thats exactly what i removed :P

and nah its not pit, it has a larger check engine light with a pic of the front of the car etc.

thanks both of you for the reply. ill check out the V35 stuff and see what they have

ill chuck on the consult tomorrow when i can find the software. might tell me if i bumped a sensor plug etc.

i dont know if this will work. but for other people that search in this section, i foud this in the V35 section. ill go outside and test it very soon:

Do this:

Turn ignition on (dont start it)

Wait 3 seconds

Press the accelerator down fully and release it 5 times within 5 seconds

Wait 10 secs

Press and hold the accelerator down fully for 10 secs (at the 10 second mark the engine light should start blinking...

Now it will blink 10 times slowly and then blink the error code...

To clear the codes press the accelerator down fully again and hold for another 10secs let it go wait 10 seconds and turn the ignition off.. This will clear the codes.. but wont stop the light coming back on if there is still a fault somewhere.

You can download the workshop manual from 350z-tech.com it tells you all about it and the codes and what they mean.

Just take it for a drive for a couple of hundred Km's and have it start a dozen or so times and the check engin light will go away,

this has happened to me a couple of time from similar circumstances and is went away every time after a long drive, none of the other ways worked for me

Matt

its all good i took it to the yard that sold me the car, they hooked up the consult and reset the code. it WAS the AFM/temp sensor like i thought it was. no biggie

the reset technique above didnt work on my car for some reason.........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...