Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just wondering what you guys think of this setup im working on where ive place the intercooler behind the radiator support and the radiator behind that. im looking at a plazmaman or similar plenum just to finish it off. tell me what you think any constructive critisism would be helpful. the cars currently being setup for hillclimbs and motorkhanas so im looking for response. and yes the afm is mounted in the cooler piping

post-50393-1223963221_thumb.jpg

post-50393-1223963240_thumb.jpg

post-50393-1223963253_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/240155-intercooler-setup/
Share on other sites

different

did you do this to minimise intercooler piping? was there a big difference in response due to it? just curious

edit: oh just realised that its not complete yet.

tbh i didnt notice a massive difference in lag when i have gone from smic or tmic to fmic. a lot of extra piping but i doubt there would be much difference in laptimes due to response

Edited by InterCooL
different

did you do this to minimise intercooler piping? was there a big difference in response due to it? just curious

yeah that was the idea not quite complete yet because i still havnt decided on what plenum to use i reckon response should improve a bit i was running a normal fmic before this so as the pipings probably over a meter shorter i am expecting an improvement

edit: oh just realised that its not complete yet.

tbh i didnt notice a massive difference in lag when i have gone from smic or tmic to fmic. a lot of extra piping but i doubt there would be much difference in laptimes due to response

yeah its probably not really all that necessary but i like to think every bit helps. also as the car has a vg30 turbo the lags annoying me so if i can reduce that even just slightly i will be happy

IMO your going to struggle.

Removing the clutch fan and replacing it with a set of thermo's is one thing (and generally doesnt seem to work that well)

But to then then stick a cooler infront of it further restricting the air/function of the radiator... thats another. Especially with lower speed events like hillclimb/khana's where big speed (and therefore airflow) isnt neccesarily going to match the high ends of 1st/2nd gear

I'd expect issues keeping the car cool. yYour going to need as much ducting as possible, blanking off the sides to force air through etc etc

If you wanted to improve response, using a more appropriately sized cooler would have been a better idea... and at the same time moving it infront of the rad support to reduce the heatsoak/transfer.

Any gain from moving the piping is going to be lost by the increase in heat (and size of cooler) as i see it.

People might/might not agree, but thats what i reckon with buggering around with my varying setups over the years.

yeah heat transfer from the radiator is something i was concerned about. on the track i will be running water spray and possibly a water injection system to try help keep it cool. ive already started making some ducting and various deflectors to try and direct as much air to the cooler as possible. itll be running at least two 10inch ir possibly bigger spal thermo fans that will be left on constanly ie. no thermo switch and also a nismo thermostadt. the afm is also going to be placed either back in the intake or onto the cold side of the intercooler. and all cooler pipes are to be wrapped in thermo tape. it will also be using a vertex front bumper thats been modified to supply more air to the coolers

Hey Phunky, my tuner has done that setup with an SR in an S14 using an inverted ARE cooler. From memory there is a larger gap btn the cooler and radiator which has then been sealed. Probably to minimise radiant heat. Used AU thermo fans.

Anyway it puts out 440rwhp and apparently holds the lap record at Barbagello on the short circuit. It also generally wins the supersprints and hill climbs at Barbagello....which is not bad for a streetcar with full interior (with half cage). So it can't be a bad setup.

I also spoke to Wayne Embleton of Embleton Engineering here in Perth about that sort of setup some time ago. He mentioned that the response from the shorter piping was noticeably improved.

Cheers,

im my general opinion, there is always going to be a big letdown to these style of modifications ie something thats different. Cars are designed to be optimal from factory but can be improved by adding a fmic etc, but i'd just follow what others have done successfully as they have already experimented with it and have reported good results.

my concerns are you'll need to carefully duct air to them, and not enough gap between rad and intercooler. you are going to get a lot of heat transfer from rad to intercooler which is not good. especially when you are sitting still at the start of a hillclimb for example your intercooelr is going to get heatsoaked very quickly. with it getting up to 80degrees plus BEFORE you even begin pumping any boost through it. it might end up being an interwarmer for the first half of a run! also with so little room between engine and rad you certainly can't fit the standard engine fan and will have trouble fitting any decent sized electric fans either.

I really don't think any benefit in piping length is worth the negatives. also you now have some quite tight radius bends in that pipework which wouldn't be so bad in a more traditional layout.

I'm all for trying new things and the idea had some legs but in practice I don't think it will prove worthwhile.

hey thanks for all the comments guys i'll be taking them into consideration. a few problems have already been rectified. i have placed the afm back into the intake and mad a new hot pipe which is a lot smother and is one piece. it seems everyone is generally against the idea of thermo fans if anyone here is running thermo's can you let me know if theyre working any good. i still like the idea of this setup and have seen several track and drift cars running a similar setup. i am currently working on some ideas to try and reduce heat soak into the intercooler. heres an updated pic

post-50393-1224037213_thumb.jpg

Here is another option.

Basically the intercooler is in the typical location, however the piping enters up the top and at the back of the cooler. Your reduce your piping length and reduce heatsoak. However, it nessecitates cutting the body work on each side of the radiator for the pipe work. This setup is made by Full-Race (home of the twin scroll specialists) in the US.

Car9.jpg

^^ mine is similar in thought, the piping goes under/behind the headlight rather than right around either side, very short

I see 69-70 degree temp on a 25 degree day with a bit of a poke :D

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/co...image63198.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/co...image63195.html

^^ mine is similar in thought, the piping goes under/behind the headlight rather than right around either side, very short

I see 69-70 degree temp on a 25 degree day with a bit of a poke :D

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/co...image63198.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/co...image63195.html

nismoid. with your set-up why does the pipe turn 180 degrees, then airflow needs to turn 90 degrees again inside the cooler. you could have just had it go straight into the side of the cooler instead of making it curve back on itself and come into the front of the cooler and then it's hitting the tank at right angles instead of straight in. possibly not the best plan. the pipe run is a good idea though, but the entry to the intercooler is weird. way harder than it had to be...

in fact doing it that way would have saved more piping length too and got rid of a few bends.

gallery_709_1130_73782.jpg

I would just do it like this:

medgallery7091130737821kf1.jpg

yeah i know.

Its hard to see from the pics, but the end tank is curved and the exit point you show is the skinniest part of the end tank... was far too hard to get it to be done the other way

would have required new end tanks etc etc.

Its a replacement core for a GTS-R (ARC) so i didnt wanna butcher it too much incase i sell or something later on.

Im thinking of going a one-off custom one at some point, but it'll have to do for now!

I have twin spal thermo's on my rb26 with a thick 57mm koyo radiator and dont have any issues. The weekend we got it running it was straight to a local car show where it cruised around at speeds lower than 20km'h in 35-40deg heat with regular burnouts, sitting in lines for up to an hour idling etc. According to the ecu water temps never went above 87degC. The previous year with a clutch fan and stock radiator temps were only a few deg lower (obv at low speeds the thinner radiator performed better, and during burnouts the clutch fan would have been pulling more air but overall there wasnt a great deal of difference).

yes im bringing this post back to life to say that i am now looking at a boot mounted radiator setup not unlike the team orange drift cars or garage sauras gold r32 GTR i think this setup will provide a solution to al the previously mentioned problems with my original design. Before you all tell me how complex this is to do please keep in mind i am well aware of this and have the necessary equiptment and skills to complete such a modification. once again any coments or constructive critisism would be much appreciated

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...