Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just thought I'd clarify for you guys wanting to block bov the coke can does the job perfecty. I did it today just for Shit and giggles and took me a whole 15 min just make sure you trace the bottom of bov on can and cut around the trace place cut out in between bov and the intake pipe mount Put back together and vwallahh you have flutter tutututu.

Btw this was performed on a standard bov and with a k&n pod filter.

Edited by Vlasi

Hahahahaha that's funny as madaz. skyhi its short for a blow off valve it is a valve that allows boost pressure leave your turbo system also makes A tsuuuuuu sound with standard bov and pod filter and you can get after market bov that makes a more defined tsuuuu sound

also makes A tsuuuuuu sound with standard bov and pod filter and you can get after market bov that makes a more defined tsuuuu sound

so, this tsuuuu sound, what does it do? like, i see the original bov has more u's after it therefore its a longer kind of sound right?

Edited by SkyHi_33

Some how this trick saved my a** tonight when the cops were doing their "part 2" at a RBT tonight. They were after a atmo BOV and they watched it while they got me to rev the hell out of the engine. All they heard was tsuuuuuuu from the turbo, then they were like that's ok!

Sometimes i feel sorry for them as they obviously did not have a clue, twice they looked over the engine bay before they asked "Where is the Blow off valve?"

My god they over looked the boost controller and solenoid, FMIC, POD, Exhaust, rim spacers, etc. Makes me think i could of had a high mount turbo and NOS kit and they still would just be after a BOV.

Madaz, they were pretty good about the whole thing but i remembered what i read sometime ago about these things. Which was not to offer too much info about anything in or on the car.

So that was you scandyflick out the front of Mayne Pharma that time? Its on the camera's man and she was actually 45!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...