Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I dont want to lose my pod cause to me its not a turbo unless i dont have that sucking noise and flutter.

You can still hear suction and flutter through a high flow panel filter. The intercooler does amplify these sounds. Sure, these won't be as loud as they would be with a pod but they do get noticeably louder after you install that cooler...

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

thanks everyone for your opinion i guess ill go wit hiding my frount mount and try with a normal air box see how it sounds if good enough ill keep it if not go wit the pod.

^ Good Job

Although it still looks as if your hiding somthing :)

then again, a cop doesnt have the right to touch anything in your engine bay so technically cant prove if there is a pod under there..

Edited by willL
well I better not..

since I'm already at 60% warning due to someone elses power trip issues.

tough break lol.... i nearly got a warning because some fool took what i said the wrong way TWICE, then i got pissed off and replied for everyone to see after night shift at 1am in the morning lol....

I made an airbox for mine, Just outa sheet metal, then finished with crinkle coat so it looked stockish, then clark rubber 'pinch weld' for edge protection. :)

post-47680-1224757448_thumb.jpg

post-47680-1224757479_thumb.jpg

say i had the seet up that duke has,,,,, the box looks legit but i have a fmic thats not engineered,,,, copper pulls me over and defets me for the fmic,,,,, when i take it to get inspected and get the defect removed could they (rta i supose, whoever checks the defected car) then keep the defect notice on because of something that the cop mised,,,,, like the pod or bald tyres or another defectable item????

Haha, yeah, :)

Here in WA your allowed pods but they have to be secure, mine is loose as...

Iv'e got something to secure it with but haven't gotten around to it.

but it's outa sight, outa mind from the police atm, lol

^ Good Job

Although it still looks as if your hiding somthing :P

then again, a cop doesnt have the right to touch anything in your engine bay so technically cant prove if there is a pod under there..

Hmmm, why exactly do you want to keep the pod filter?

I see it as:

Performance? Without CAI it's not so great.

Legal? Well no, prepare for a defect in most states if you've got the intercooler as well.

As per previous answers you could use the stock airbox which will hide it, but you've still got a fair chance of getting defected for it, so it's your choice if you want to play it safe or not.

Getting a black intercooler may help too, but its not exactly foolproof :P

thanks everyone for your opinion i guess ill go wit hiding my frount mount and try with a normal air box see how it sounds if good enough ill keep it if not go wit the pod.

So obviously you dont want the pod for power, the set up your planning to go with will lose you power, the jjr stealth intercooler set up uses the standard ic pipe holes, normally thats where a pod will draw its cold air from, with those blocked all your engine is ingesting is hot air from the engine bay.

^ Good Job

Although it still looks as if your hiding somthing :P

then again, a cop doesnt have the right to touch anything in your engine bay so technically cant prove if there is a pod under there..

He doesn't have to touch anything, thats not the issue.

The officer simply sends you to the EPA and then you'll have to prove to them whats inside it.

keep your stock airbox handy in the shed, lol :D

Just outa curiosity:

Do the cops seriously do that in Vic?

Also, why is it an EPA issue over there?

Over here it's the DPI that deals with you and they only right a list of your defects and tell you to fix them or permit them. It's only if they catch you gutting your cat that they'll get narky but you'd have to really piss them off for them to actually do the paper work to fine you, haha

keep your stock airbox handy in the shed, lol :D

Just outa curiosity:

Do the cops seriously do that in Vic?

Also, why is it an EPA issue over there?

Over here it's the DPI that deals with you and they only right a list of your defects and tell you to fix them or permit them. It's only if they catch you gutting your cat that they'll get narky but you'd have to really piss them off for them to actually do the paper work to fine you, haha

Yeh they are that bad man, its hopeless.

The EPA is Aust wide, yet the laws they enact upon are only drawn up by our lovely local Gov't. The laws are from 1992, and so out of touch with current cars, mods, emissions and so on that its not funny...

But alas, the police dont care, they dont get paid to :)

EPA is worse than whatever your road worthy body is. I believe you guys can get engineers papers for each mod.

Over here its two tier.

EPA = emissions and anything that might affect them (no matter how ridiculous, like a pod/IC, doesnt alter emissions dick all, but its illegal)

VicRoads/Engineers = modifications/mechanical and so on. Brakes/suspension/engine conversions - that kinda stuff

say i had the seet up that duke has,,,,, the box looks legit but i have a fmic thats not engineered,,,, copper pulls me over and defets me for the fmic,,,,, when i take it to get inspected and get the defect removed could they (rta i supose, whoever checks the defected car) then keep the defect notice on because of something that the cop mised,,,,, like the pod or bald tyres or another defectable item????

somebody answer this question who has had experience or knows the law in nsw for it?????

He doesn't have to touch anything, thats not the issue.

The officer simply sends you to the EPA and then you'll have to prove to them whats inside it.

True, I guess you have the time to put stock box back on before epa test, but theres still the hassle of going to get EPA check etc etc.

Pods fine here in QLD as long as its secured down, not flapping about. Mate of mine is getting his car looked over has front mount, high mount turbo, pod, waste gate. Just has stock suspension put in wheels with good tread (borrowed my 9.5 rears and 9 fronts. ) and they let him through fine. Only hold up is that he doesnt have a engine number lol.

You will only have to change it if they tell you to but as long as its secure then it should be fine.

What do you guys think if I get that stealth just jap cooler paint it blak and put blak mesh in the front bar in the opening. I rekon that would be prety hard to see especialy at night and also considering the cooler uses the stock pipes. I dont want to lose my pod cause to me its not a turbo unless i dont have that sucking noise and flutter. what u guys think?

1. Record the sucking noise and the flutter.

2. Get rid of the pod and fit the original airbox and snorkel with a high flow panel filter.

3. Play the sucking noise and flutter through your stereo.

1. Record the sucking noise and the flutter.

2. Get rid of the pod and fit the original airbox and snorkel with a high flow panel filter.

3. Play the sucking noise and flutter through your stereo.

Bit rough don't you think?? :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...