Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've done a search and I know that it's best to have compression across all the cylinders ~10% but what I'd like to know is how bad my results are and whether I should start looking for a new motor (25 conversion maybe). Currently my turbo is playing up so I will be looking for an RB25 turbo as it is and I could factor that price into a complete engine.

My results on an accurate reader were:

165 160 165 155 140 130

Is it time to start looking around for a new motor?

Low compression certainly indicates wear. Ultimately it will result in less power, increased consumption, poor running and eventually a busted engine. How bad it gets is a mixed bag of factors. Some engines go for ever with a low cylinder or two and make OK power. Depends what you want from the engine, how hard you drive, what your plans are etc etc. Engines are always wearing out, that's the nature of the beast.

Weigh up what you want from the car, how you're set for finances and go from there. You're not going to hurt the car by driving it as it is but if you flog it constantly you will accelerate the wear and possibly cause damage from failure down the track.

  ActionDan said:
Low compression certainly indicates wear. Ultimately it will result in less power, increased consumption, poor running and eventually a busted engine. How bad it gets is a mixed bag of factors. Some engines go for ever with a low cylinder or two and make OK power. Depends what you want from the engine, how hard you drive, what your plans are etc etc. Engines are always wearing out, that's the nature of the beast.

Weigh up what you want from the car, how you're set for finances and go from there. You're not going to hurt the car by driving it as it is but if you flog it constantly you will accelerate the wear and possibly cause damage from failure down the track.

Thanks mate. I'm babying it a fair bit these days especially since the turbo is on its last legs. My ultimate goal isn't to make it a power house and it's mainly just a daily driven normally with a bit of a squirt on the weekends but eventually I'd love to attend some track days. Currently I'm saving money and picking up bits I need so I guess it's time to seriously consider the RB25 swap.

If you've got engine wear and a dying turbo then tread carefully. Failure of either could cause some serious damage to the rest of the engine. If you have track aspirations then at the very least you're going to want a healthy standard engine in there. Do some reading on what power you can get from your intended setup and if it's not enough the consider having a rebuild done with upgraded internals. A good rule of thumb is to build the engine stronger than what you want from it to give you some head room to grow and to protect the engine.

Good luck :)

  ActionDan said:
If you've got engine wear and a dying turbo then tread carefully. Failure of either could cause some serious damage to the rest of the engine. If you have track aspirations then at the very least you're going to want a healthy standard engine in there. Do some reading on what power you can get from your intended setup and if it's not enough the consider having a rebuild done with upgraded internals. A good rule of thumb is to build the engine stronger than what you want from it to give you some head room to grow and to protect the engine.

Good luck :)

Cheers dude, I'm barely reving the thing just driving around normally until my other car goes on the road. A healthy motor will definitely be in order as reliability is my aim, I don't need much power just enough for a bit of fun. I'd really like the torque from an RB25 but was pretty happy with my 20's top end.

Thanks again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...