Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently I was asked to conducted a few tests on amphometer based speed measuring. To do this I accessed a timing system which consists of two rubber hoses and a digital timing system commonly used in motorsport events.

For the first test, I have found that by driving the front wheels over the strips at an angle (as in changing lanes) there are marked differences in the readings. These very from very minor differences at small angles of attack to quite large differences at big angles of attack.

The second test I have carried out is to let the pressure in one tyre down to 5 psi and have the other tyre at 40 psi, a reasonable hot run tyre pressure. Once again I get marked differences in the readings. Not as dramatic as those found with angles of attack, but certainly enough to make any reading suspect to within 20%.

The third test was to place a 20 mm thick piece of wood (to simulate a bump) either before, after or in between the strips. The effects were quite unpredictable and very difficult to repeat as very minor changes in speed, steering angle, acceleration and braking displayed dramatic differences in readings.

The most radical differences I get are when I have one tyre contacting one strip at almost exactly the same time as I have the other wheel contacting the other strip ie; trip both almost simultaneously. Several times I have seen timing which would equate to over 100 kph at less than 10 kph indicated speed. This is easily achieved at what I would consider normal lane change angles.

I have also asked the RTA to provide expansion and contraction rates of asphalt over the typical temperature ranges you see in Sydney in a 12 month period. This has not yet arrived, but in a number of articles I have read they typically quote numbers from -2.1% (-3 degrees Celsius) to +3.6% (+62 degrees Celsius). Remembering that these are tarmac temperatures, not ambient air temperatures So if the amphometer was calibrated to read accurately at +3.6% for 60 KPH it would read 63.5 kph at -2.1%.

I am unsure as to whether the buried amphometers used for speed camera detection have some form of control system logic which may overcome a number of these types of issues but that aside, and based on the above testing, I would have to say they are quite capable of giving inaccurate readings, just as any other form of speed measurement.

I am posting this to elicit some feedback from others who may have experience is this issue as research into this subject seems to either be suppressed or non existent.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24161-amphometer-based-speed-cameras/
Share on other sites

Hi guys, a lot of people don't know that fixed speed cameras are amphometer based. The assumption has always been radar or laser. These are both far more expensive solutions, particularly on multi lane roads with no overhead bridge work to mount the transmitters. So the revenue raisers have resorted to the cheapest method possible.

Us old guys remember mobile amphometers used before radar, They got the flick because of inaccuracy, plus the 18 wheelers used to hit them with the cabin wheels and then lock up the trailer wheels and make big black spaghetti out of the rubber strips. Damn funny to watch.

Sydneykid,

Do you know if this applies to Vic fixed speed cameras? The bastards are mounted everywhere these days but I'm pretty sure they are digital and use a form of laser to trap cars. If they had to have the rubber strips mounted under the road they would have to rip up part of the road surface to do it and I certainly don't remember them doing that when they installed all those ones along the western ring rd.....

Hi guys, the old rubber strips used to blow in the wind and jump up and down when cars went over them, they were a joke.

The new stuff is basically is just 3 X 10mm wide saw blade cuts about 200 mm apart, 40 mm deep. They then squeeze the sensors into the cuts, run the wires back to the box and then seal it up with tar. Quick, cheap and nasty.

So far I have measured 3 sets and they vary in distance apart by 8% ie: + or - 16 mm. Even the manufacturer www.poltech.com.au quotes accuracy of + or - 2% when installed perfectly and these are far from installed perfectly.

I am trying to gather as much info as I can from all sources, because the total accuracy factor has not been tested, as far as I can see, in court.

On all the speed cameras (I have seen anyway) in NSW you can see the three lines that are cut into the road quite easily at normal travelling speed. In some cases on crappy roads its more noticable because the patch of tar has been replaced where the sensors are.

I believe the VIC cameras are fully digital or radar based or something like that, and do not rely on any form of strip in the road to activate them. They basically look like more modern versions of the old red light cameras we have around here. I've seen them go up, and there are no marks are cut in the road, and are put up in a matter of days.

Some 90 new fixed cameras will be installed in Victoria before the end of the year. Considering if what you say is true, there is some +- 3% accuracy, and there is a 3km/hr tolerance in VIC, that could make a large difference.

Revenue raising however finds no distriction on the conditions of the road at the time... basically, they couldn't care less as long as they collect their hundreds of millions of dollars each year (read my sig)

Yeah, I always look out for the 3 lines on the road :) I've never had the balls to go over them and then gas it though. Anyway, that's really interesting to know. After some more research, perhaps you might be able to convince some sort of current affair show to run a report on revenue raising and the inaccuracy of the cameras :) Those people will whinge at anything

THe Victorian speed camera (fixed speed cameras) are amphometer based. They all have three lines cut into the roads as described. Drive down the Western Ring road and you will clearly see the lines.

Sydney Kid I am very interested in your finding etc and would like to get hold of more info as it becomes available. Who has commissioned this work and for what purposes? WIll your finding be freely available?

Can you tell us if when the tyre pressure was high was the finding higher or lower? Was the differecen in the size ofthe tyre at these various pressures taken into account of calculating the speed? How was the offical speed measured?

Like I said I am very interested in this and look forward in reading more.

Mick.

Originally posted by predator666

I believe the VIC cameras are fully digital or radar based or something like that, and do not rely on any form of strip in the road to activate them. They basically look like more modern versions of the old red light cameras we have around here. I've seen them go up, and there are no marks are cut in the road, and are put up in a matter of days.  

Some 90 new fixed cameras will be installed in Victoria before the end of the year. Considering if what you say is true, there is some +- 3% accuracy, and there is a 3km/hr tolerance in VIC, that could make a large difference.  

Revenue raising however finds no distriction on the conditions of the road at the time... basically, they couldn't care less as long as they collect their hundreds of millions of dollars each year (read my sig)

I think those 90 new speed cameras should be rammed up steve bracks (Vic Premier whos has a speed camera fetish) ass 1 at a time. :uh-huh:

Hi guys, some questions I can answer, some I can't.

Tyre pressure only seems to be relevant when it is different accros the front axle ie; one tyre is much lower than the other. This would also lead to an inaccurate reading when you had different diameter tyres, like say a space saver or if you had a different size, say 15" and a 17".

I have now also completed another test under heavy braking and with ABS active and found some random unbelievable results eg; we had a reading over 200 kph when stopping with the ABS activated at 30 kph.

These units made by Poltech are much cheaper than imported laser based units. Noting that radar is basically useless on multi lane roads because of its wide angle of spread. The laser based units also suffer from the requirement for regular servicing, this is costly. Plus they move (vibrate) when car & trucks go past, so they record errors and miss catching offenders. They also suffer from wind induced vibration due to the height required and the size of the structure, which is also costly. All this makes the Australian manufactured, amphometer based units very attractive.

My opinion would be that they will become even more popular in all states due to their cost effective revenue raising potential.

I would suggest that anyone who receives an infringement notice for a fixed speed camera offence less than 10% over the limit considers defending it it court. A copy of the data sheet from Poltech (available on their web site) indicates + or - 2%. Add to that the fact that most car manufacturers quote + or - 3% for speedo accuracy. In addition different tyres have different circumferences, even the same size tyre can have different measurements in different brands. The DOT standard allows + or - 4% for the same size tyre when new. If these were all cumulative you could easily be infringed at 65 kph when in fact you were doing 60 kph indicated on your speedo.

This of course does not include the sort of errors I am currently researching.

THe Victorian speed camera (fixed speed cameras) are amphometer based. They all have three lines cut into the roads as described. Drive down the Western Ring road and you will clearly see the lines.

It depends on the place and the type.. Freeway cameras are different to the ones going up at all the intersections. As far as i can tell (and i will check) no extra lines are cut into the road for those.

If you have 2 weight sensors, one after the other and an object travels over the top of them, then you can measure the difference in time that the sensors were activated. And if you know how far the sensors are away from each other (30cm for example) you can determine the speed of the object. Speed cameras are a little more sophisticated than that, but it's generally how it works.

Hi guys, KPH = distance over time. If the distance is constant then the time taken to travel the distance tells you the speed. Shorter time = higher speed.

The common system has 3 parallel sensors embedded in the road. The clock starts when one wheel crosses the first sensor and stops when the same wheel crosses the second sensor. Crossing the second sensor also starts another timer which stops when the same wheel crosses the third sensor. The unit then compares the two times, if they are widely different then the unit discards the reading. If they are close (don't know how close) then it converts the time to kph, if it is in excess of the posted speed (60 kph) then it takes a digital photo. In fact 2 photos, one to establish location and the other a close up of the number plate. It then sends these photos and the accompanying data to the infringement processor. They have a digital scanner that automatically recognises the number plate, looks up the owner and then sends you an infringement notice in the mail. Basically no human intervention.

On a multilane road they simply embed 3 sensors in each lane and send their signals separately back to the controller. It knows which set of (3) sensors is in each lane, records times (speeds) and takes photos appropriately.

The sensors have to be set up to record speeds for motorcycles so they only need one wheel to start the timer and one to stop it. If the vehicle is travelling straight and both front wheels hit at the same time then there is no inaccuracy other than problems as spelt out in previous posts.

The sensors for red light cameras have to laid out completely differently and triggered firstly by the red light and secondly by a wheel crossing them. This is quite different logic and sensor location in the road way. However there is the potential to use common photographic equipment and use the software programming to determine which sensor set to use at which time. Combination red light and speed camera, what a great way to earn twice as much revenue.

Hope that adds further to the knowledge base

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...