Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

need some help with this dyno graph,,,, i have no idea what its saying lol, i can work out 159.5rwkw was maximum run. does motive force mean torque? so does that mean im pushing 400nm? can somebody explain the rest of it and my graph aswell?

Is there anything wrong with the graph?

also only mods are pod and 3 inch turbo back..... 30-35degree temps on the day, are these good results for the situation?????

cheers

right on for those mods.

need some help with this dyno graph,,,, i have no idea what its saying lol, i can work out 159.5rwkw was maximum run. does motive force mean torque? so does that mean im pushing 400nm? can somebody explain the rest of it and my graph aswell?

Is there anything wrong with the graph?

also only mods are pod and 3 inch turbo back..... 30-35degree temps on the day, are these good results for the situation?????

cheers

Just for reference sake, my mate had similar mods but with front mount ic, pod and exhaust and made 198rwkw on the same dyno. I think he had an safc or they done something with the standard ecu.

and he was running 12psi.

Just noticed your running the completely standard boost settings going from 5psi to 7psi. So that power is right on for your boost and mods.

Cheers

lol what a newbie must this operater be to make a simple mistake like that haha

hahahah yeah it was on the jem dyno day, they only just got that dyno in and didnt know how to do some of the features or change them..... hell it took me a week and a half to get the print out lol....

but with the graph itself is there anything dangerous or can it be improved or spmething....????

but with the graph itself is there anything dangerous or can it be improved or spmething....????

Yes you're making 160kw. that kind of power could hurt if you got your finger caught in it!

the dyno graph on its own doesn't suggest anything is wrong, the power curve could be smoother but that's standard management for you. They didn't graph AFRs for you so without knowing how rich it's running we can't comment about any gains to be had there.

I think your next mod is a bleed valve for 10psi and an ECU change to get a proper tune (you'll certainly need it if you go more than 10psi anyway)

(btw dude no need to bump your post after 4 hours, the forum doesn't exist just for you!)

(btw dude no need to bump your post after 4 hours, the forum doesn't exist just for you!)

lol sorry kinks

thanlks for your help though

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
    • Little update  I have shimmed the solenoid on the rack today following Keep it Reets video on YouTube. However my steering is still tight. I have this showing on Nisscan, my steering angle sensor was the closest to 0 degrees (I could get it to 0 degrees by small little tweaks, but the angle was way off centre? I can't figure this out for the life of me. I get no faults through Nisscan. 
    • The BES920 is like the Toyota Camrys of coffee machines. E61 group head is cool, however the time requirements for home use makes it less desirable. The Toyota Camry coffee machine runs twin boilers and also PID temp control, some say it produces coffees as good as an E61 group head machine.
    • And yes with a full tank it will hit limiter free revving or driving 6B6CDF6E-4094-426D-A9CB-6C553475FE36.mp4
    • One way of putting the fuel surge idea to rest, is that even when in neutral/clutch in or free revving it still has the same issue, it can’t even get to limiter (7800) so to me that says it can’t be g force, I’m not trying to argue I just want to find the f&$king issue 😡
×
×
  • Create New...