Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys I finally used the datalogit and changed my injectors settings to 46% and a correction of 1.07 msec. and its running fine.

i just finished writing a inj. map and it looks like this.

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.09 13.78 13.49 13.11

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 13.78 13.78 13.78 13.49 12.50

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 13.78 13.78 12.50 12.50 12.22 12.10 12.10

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 13.78 13.78 12.50 12.50 12.22 12.10 11.80

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.47 14.47 14.47 14.47 13.11 13.11 12.10 12.10 12.10 11.80 11.80

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.47 14.09 14.09 14.09 13.11 13.11 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.09 14.47 14.09 13.78 13.89 12.50 12.50 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.47 14.47 14.70 14.70 14.47 13.49 13.78 13.78 13.78 13.78 12.50 12.50 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.47 14.47 14.70 13.89 14.47 13.49 13.78 13.78 12.80 12.10 12.10 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.47 14.47 13.89 13.89 13.89 12.80 13.49 13.49 12.80 12.10 12.10 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

14.70 14.70 13.20 14.47 13.20 13.89 13.89 13.89 12.80 13.49 13.49 12.50 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

14.70 14.70 13.20 14.47 13.20 13.89 13.49 13.11 12.50 12.50 12.50 12.50 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

14.70 14.70 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.89 13.49 13.11 12.50 12.50 12.10 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

14.70 14.70 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.49 13.11 12.89 12.10 12.10 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

14.70 13.49 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.49 13.11 12.89 12.10 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

13.78 13.49 13.20 13.20 13.11 13.11 12.80 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

13.78 13.49 13.20 13.11 13.11 13.11 12.80 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

13.78 13.49 13.20 13.11 13.11 12.50 12.80 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

13.78 13.49 13.20 13.11 13.11 12.50 12.80 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

13.78 13.49 13.20 13.11 13.11 12.50 12.80 12.10 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80

The car is crazy at about 4000rpms and rip the tires loose at 12psi in third gear. I'm now using everything I've learned on this site whit the datalogit and LM2 wide band to do my own tunes. Some added question would be.

When using the datalogit and using this maps should i turn the 02 sensor feed back off. ????????????

Now on the dyno is it true that the tuner would advanced the time until torque drop off on N/A cars, but On turbo cars they would do this and look at the knock levels.?????????????

My method of tuning is logging the AFR and RPMs and past one graph over the other and looking at how fast the RPMS rise.

this is without a dyno. Keeping in mind that i always keep an eye on AFR and KNOCK and its a full throttle tune from 2500 rpms in third gear.

Thanks guy's any thoughts would help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242763-tuning-tech/
Share on other sites

Yes i agree with you looking back at the graph i kept a Conservative tune with a leaner mix at low to medium low throttle. after there on i assumed that the turbo would be a full boost (12psi). so i took it to the limit that i think is safe 11.8.

at full throttle the LM2 reads a AFR about 10.9 so I'm thinking if this is the real AFR i can lean it out even more at full throttle. what you think skylinekid. how would i approach a tune for drive-ability.??? i have a good idea about limitation and power but not cruising tune for down low or partial throttle tune. what would be you approach on this.

should i turn 02 feed back off. ???????????????

I just can't get my head around it, if stock o2 is a narrow band then it can't tell the ecu how to manage the AFR ( for best power )so if i turn it off would it just reply on the maps alone.

thanks mate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242763-tuning-tech/#findComment-4233178
Share on other sites

hello

you turn off 02 feedback when you are tuning with an 02 wideband sensor

otherswise you should leave it on. the 02 sensor gives narrow feedback to the ecu to save fuel on light cruise

all the narrow 02 sensor says to the ECU is "rich" or "lean" and then ecu uses this for feedback to save fuel in light cruise

when you yank the throttle cable, the ecu doesnt look at the 02 narrow sensor and goes out of closed loop

so

light cruise =- look at 02 sensor -> closed loop running

floor it -> dont look at 02 sensor -> closed loop not running

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242763-tuning-tech/#findComment-4233362
Share on other sites

Thanks paulr33.

Just another question when it comes to the PFC ignition map. I found it to be pretty good, do you think i would be a good idea to advance each cell in small increments and keep an eye on the knock levels, as i left the ignition map the same.

At full throttle i get a knock level about 15 -18 keep in mind the is with 93 octane gas.

also i read your whole FAQ on the power fc. i like the rule of thumb that you mentioned about 12.0 at full loads, at minimal loads, light cruise, what would be the rule of thumb there. In very low loads would i make sense to go as lean as 15's or would this be a bad idea as there wouldn't be adequate fuel.

most importantly how does the ignition relate to this. Is there a rule of thumb When it comes to ignition..

many thanks mate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242763-tuning-tech/#findComment-4233540
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...