Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

like the subject says who can do this?

ive seen pleanty can do R32s but the R33 is a little different.

i know it can be done, ie Mines and i have heard a guy say he knows how to do em but won't tell me

i am looking for someone who actually provides a service not a freebie.

main thinks i am looking for is so you cna run more boost fuel timing front mount and get rid of speed cut

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24497-who-chips-r33-gts-t-ecus/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ok... They can be done but there is currently no-one in AUS doing it.

and the other thing is that it's not as simple as the R32 ones.

The R32 EPROM can be programmed and soldered on to the ECU.

then when you do mods, the same chip (which costs about $20 to purchase as a plain chip) can be RE-programmed.

The R33 ecu will require a different chip which costs about $90 to purchase as a plain chip, then programmed and soldered to the ecu.. that's all good until you do another mod because those chips are not RE-programmable.. you have to take it off, get a new chip, program that and solder it in.

So an R32 one costs you about $100 to get it chipped and then maybe $50 to get re-tuned as many times as you want, but the R33's you have to throw out..

I know of one guy who is currently working on doing these..

but it is still in DEVELOPMENT.. and will be more expensive than the R32 ones..

All you can do at the moment for the R33 is an S-AFC for fuel and some sort of speed cut device like a PIVOT speed meter..

Or power FC I guess..

Originally posted by GTST

They can be done but there is currently no-one in AUS doing it...

The R33 ecu will require a different chip which costs about $90 to purchase as a plain chip, then programmed and soldered to the ecu.. that's all good until you do another mod because those chips are not RE-programmable.. you have to take it off, get a new chip, program that and solder it in.

I know of one guy who is currently working on doing these..

but it is still in DEVELOPMENT.. and will be more expensive than the R32 ones..

I know two different people looking into it also !!

Maybe they should all get together?

But yes, there is also another method of chipping the R33 ECU, the way mine is done.

This is by using a daughter board the goes into the original chips place on in the ECU.

This then makes it just the same as an R32 ECU, with chips the can be wiped and re-porgrammed in a matter of mins. So the cost is no different to an R32 tune/chip.

But again, no-one is Oz can do it... yet.

speed cut device like a PIVOT speed meter

or just cut wire 53..

Ash, i reckon you should be renting out your ECU for like research time for big $$ :) cause when somebody cracks the R33 ECU and works out how to do all the goodness of reprogramming, its gonna be BIG

well the japs know how to do it cos romeditor has the address files for remapping the ecus. the chip itself is a MPU which contains everything on it. silvias with MPU can be rechippped but they're easy cos they've got pads on the PCB to do it. skylines from what it sounds need a replacement for the MPU to perform the same functionality

Toshi can do the R33 chips.

He is advertising in the for sales section, do the R32 ones.

I've PM'd him and he confirmed that he can BUT as said before, they are a write once chip.

So if you change your mods you need to get a new chip, not just reprogram it.

Might be a good option if you are going to limit your mods.

J

Originally posted by Jay95R33

Toshi can do the R33 chips.

He is advertising in the for sales section, do the R32 ones.

I've PM'd him and he confirmed that he can BUT as said before, they are a write once chip.

hrrmm... so he cant do what i've got ie. the re-programmable set-up.

And do you know if he actually has a dyno or is a dyno operator?

... As getting the chip right first off i can't see happening even if you DO have a dyno and have been using one for years. You might get it 'reasonably' close but by no means as good as could be.

It would take a number of tries to get the tuning correct and in turn, that's mean multiple chips just on the one dyno tune seeing as though these are not the 're-writeable' style.

so in effect it would push the $$$ up substancially more ?? if you wanted a decent tune rathar than a once off laptop guess ??

Or is there a was via a real-time emulator ?

he can't do the 33 ECU yet Impul...

Dr_drift/BMT is where i get my car tuned via my ECU and he's been trying to get a daughterboard like mine from Japan or get it copied so it can be replicated. but as it stands at the moment he can't actually chip the R33 ECU itself.

(unless that's changed in the past week or two :))

R31Nismoid - Not sure on most of your questions. I dropped him an email a while ago and he said he could do the R33 GTS-t's. Nothing more was said and i didn't any further questions.

Anyone know if Dr_drift/BMT are able to tune/modify the R32 GTS-t ECU's to run the RB25DET's (eg r32 ecu in a r33) ??

J

Originally posted by R31Nismoid

i think he has indeed tinkered with that

we were gonna guinea pig a bit with my ecu for various things but then we found the chip  :/

lol

Cool - I bought a second hand R32 ECU for that exact reason - to be modded to suit a R33 gts-t.

I might have to see how he has progressed with it.

J

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...