Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

"GT3566" sounds like its moving closer in the direction of a T04Z than a GT3582R. One of my mates made 1bar by ~3500rpm with a GT3582R and a 6boost manifold on an RB25 so 20psi by under 4000rpm with a cammed RB26 and a good manifold could be conceiveable. The 4300rpm 20psi 370wkw setup was with a first ever effort manifold made in the garage and probably gives a fair bit away to things like 6boost/Fullrace manifolds.

For those that love to hate.

T04z on RB25 with small cams planted in a S14...

1bar by 4000rpm

1.5bar by 4300rpm

2bar by 4500rpm

Done in 4th gear because I cant hold the video cam and drive in 3rd as the 285's loose traction (got some vid of that as well)

If you want to see the video supply an email addy as its 19mb because as soon as i compress it you cant see the rev counter...

Edited by Rezlo
For those that love to hate.

T04z on RB25 with small cams planted in a S14...

1bar by 4000rpm

1.5bar by 4300rpm

2bar by 4500rpm

Done in 4th gear because I cant hold the video cam and drive in 3rd as the 285's loose traction (got some vid of that as well)

If you want to see the video supply an email addy as its 19mb because as soon as i compress it you cant see the rev counter...

Rezlo,

I wouldn't mind checking the video out as I too am tossing up between a T04z and a GT35. Maybe you could post it up on youtube? My email is [email protected]

Cheers,

Tom

EDIT: yep, I'm hating already! LOL

Edited by tommis85

Sent,

Both vids are with a full 3" exhaust as well (they very serious about sound emissions here) when I run the 4" dump from the down pipe for drags it spools up a bit faster.

Unfortunatly I can not tell you that, we only have one proper hub dyno in RSA, thats about 1400km from where I live, all our local home brew dyno's love to have cars walk at anything over 300kw so we learn to do without dyno's for tuning or power runs.

First round of our nationals are in feb, will see if I can get it on the hub dyno,

Edited by Rezlo

i have a fully built rb25 with a GT35 with .82 rear housing. it hits 20psi at 4000rpm, which is great for the track but i drive the car on the street more and find it a little laggy on the street. im goin to change the rear housing to a .62 as i feel i would enjoy driving it more and its not all about how much power it makes its about how it makes the power n wen. dont get me wrong it is reasonably responsive n 4000rpm for 20psi is good but u need the rev the crap out of it all the time to hav the power n u just cant do that on the street unless u want to loose ur licence. but hey like i said wen ur on the track and the revs are up round the 4000k plus the turbo spools very quick n is awsome.

post-38614-1230856491_thumb.jpg

Well OT but IMO you could have made more than enough power with a GT3076R which for its size is a better thing than a GT3582R in small turbine housing form . 2WD RB25 , how much can you get to the ground .

My opinions only , cheers A .

BTW has anyone looked into the large frame BB P/60-1 ?

http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=GTB

http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=GTB

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

ive drivven both round a track. the 35 is more lazy and comes on sooner but much less urgantly. it drops right of on gearchanges

t04z has to be driven in anger comes on much harder but makes more power. it is much laggier on the track but. it doesnt drop of nearly as much as on gearchanges once its going.

unless you are a gun driver (which im not) the 35r will be a better choice. but you will miss the exitement and power of a t04z.

you really need to work out if you can live with lag. 350-400kw is a very broad and dificult target to reach with minimul lag.

t04z has to be driven in anger comes on much harder but makes more power. it is much laggier on the track but. it doesnt drop of nearly as much as on gearchanges once its going.

You mentioned this dropping off on gearchanges thing, thats a bit weird - was it more than one car that you have experienced this dropping off thing with GT35Rs? I've been in cars running .63 and .82 GT35Rs on RB25/26/30s and once you are in the "happy zone" they have always come on nice and hard and certainly no falling over in gears - wonder if what you have experienced there is something a bit different.

Maybe it had the new HKS BOV? of the 3 Ive now used on turbo's bigger than GT30's with 1.5bar or more they all dont shut fast enough making the vehicle feel terrible between shifts

Edited by Rezlo

What would the other determining factors (other than the turbo) as to where/how quick your car builds boost/power?

Eg; if two cars using identical turbos (incl rear housing), what would be the major things that differntiate their power outputs?

eg

-maifold design

-cams

-exhaust size

because i guess you could get a properly set up T04Z making power nearly as early as a poorly set up GT35 Right?

sorry if this doesnt make sense, im just trying to understand the 'bigger picture'

to me it felt like the inertia of the t4 kept it spinning longer than the 35r inbetween changes. both cars had a properly functioning bov vented to atmo (ie no flutter)

Yes I agree with you, if I change over 5000rpm that power is there almost instantly in the following gear...

the T04Z/T67BB/whatever people call them are "So pre-2005" these days haha.

Makes me wonder how the GT35 is so much more advanced for having so much less power and only fractionaly faster spool up.. Maybe Garrett is working backwards?

Makes me wonder how the GT35 is so much more advanced for having so much less power and only fractionaly faster spool up.. Maybe Garrett is working backwards?

Because while the GT35R has a lower power potential makes a reasonable amount less power, it is MUCH better in terms of spool. Here is a dyno comparison of a GT35R and a T04Z on very very similar engine setups and boost levels:

2l8j9fc.jpg

You can see the GT35R is starting to fall over though the T04Z setup with 270deg cams might have a bit of a breathing advantage as there is no other rational explanation for it to be making more power through the midrange on less boost.

I'm fairly sure thats my 35r in the plot above. Here is the original which explains the strange power curve. The mid-range is weak as its only 1.3bar, boost creeps as revs rise as does power. The drop-off up top is due to boost coming back down to where it should be.

My head is stock with only tomei poncams whereas Simons gtr (I'm fairly sure thats his in the plot) has some headwork/cams. Looks like Paul has scaled my plot to account for the difference between hubbers and dd.

done18.jpg

Edited by DCIEVE

If he has scaled it, it looks like he has given the T04Z the benefit of the doubt as really with the amount of boost the GT35R is creeping up to in the midrange I'd expect it to surpass the T04Z at those rev ranges, though the T04Z will no doubt edge it out before and after those points.... shame about the "funny" boost curve as it doesn't do the GT35Rs strengths over the T04Z justice, even in shape of the curve. Its still pretty blatent how much better it spools, though.

If that graph is of Simons' GTR then that's not really a typical example of a T04Z on a typical RB26.. it's all horses for courses though!

Simon who? Its some SAU member's one, can't remember his username. There is a Simon in NZ who has a Stagea with a T04Z on it which is also much laggier/weaker down low than any dyno plot I've ever seen for a GT35R - but it makes good power, of course.

The overlay above is the only decent reference of one in comparison with a GT3582R though - do you think its better or worse than usual?? Its consistant with what I've seen overall - all things being equal, the GT35R is invariably a fair bit better spooling than a T04Z and the T04Z is capable of more up top. Its not too surprising, as the T04Z is like 6mm larger on the inducer, bigger turbine, and older design - I'm not sure what magic people think they have which would make them spool similar to a GT35R.

Hell my mate who has a GT35R on his GTR can launch the thing at the drags at 5500-6000rpm without bogging, if it launches the way guys with low mount twins like GT2530s need to he just fries the tyres through 1st - and T04Zs are laggier again than those. Go figure.

Edited by Lithium

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
×
×
  • Create New...