Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Maybe someone can clear a couple of things up for me..

Ive read when tuning the fuel maps with the PFC that the O2 feedback should be turned off. ok, but should it be turned back on after tuning is finished ?

Also, the o2 feedback loop, is it more economical to run with it on or off ?

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/
Share on other sites

i find with mine turned on it used to retart the ignition when u booted it and back teh fuel out

the tune on the car was farcked anyway what i have to loose i guess

turned it off again

and it would rev beter

not trying to lean it out etc

my engin prefers t run a little rich

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4286129
Share on other sites

typically on when driving normally

it should be off when wideband tuning your car

in most scenarios you will get good economy with it on and a basic tune

if you have an aggressive tune and the tuner has spent lots of time on light cruise with a wideband sensor

you can get better economy with the 02 feedback off - you can also adjust the 02 feedback co-efficient

so its not just a fixed "stuck at 14.7" setting if that makes sense

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4286149
Share on other sites

Ok, so when its on, are the maps setup on the pfc ignored?

Reason i ask, when on monitor, i dont see the ign timing that the map is set to for that specific rpm. ie the map is set to 28' ign for idle yet under monitor the timing is 15' ... this is with feedback on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4288525
Share on other sites

Ok, so when its on, are the maps setup on the pfc ignored?

Reason i ask, when on monitor, i dont see the ign timing that the map is set to for that specific rpm. ie the map is set to 28' ign for idle yet under monitor the timing is 15' ... this is with feedback on.

Closed Loop running doesn't affect the ignition timing, only the fuel delivery. You should notice the fuel ms varying (at cruise only!).

Closed Loop attempts to run the engine at 14.7 AFR by continually reading the O2 sensor output and adjusting the fuel delivery. Because it is reactive, rather than predictive, it continually overshoots 14.7, so the AFR actually cycles between "> 14.7" and "< 14.7" AFR.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4288627
Share on other sites

For the government emissions test they have a low idle and a hight idle test (high idle being they hold the engine to approx 2750rpm).

My car is failing on high idle on carbon monoxide, whether feedback is on or off.

Anyone know if i took fuel out of the cells around that point will it bring the CO down?

Or do I have to put the cat back in (de-cat pipe fitted), in order to pass this damn test? :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246590-o2-feedback/#findComment-4294155
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...