Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

do you rewrite the values in the inj screen too add or remove fuel or do you do it in the inj correction screen for exsample

at 5000 rpm's i have a AFR mixture of 12.6 if i needed to add more fuel i would rewrite this value to 12.0 and that would be it for that load piont at that rpm ?????????

Does anyone know of a link for the fc datalogit (using it and its functions for the rb25det's)??????????

thanks agian mate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246850-how-to-add-or-remove-fuel/
Share on other sites

yes mate i have the lm2 unit

this is AFR log in 4th gear Full throttle at 12psi i need to get 12.0 AFR on full load how do i take away fuel???????????

post-37293-1227916365_thumb.jpg

Edited by MJTru

i have red the instuction and i'm lost i have no base map like he talked about i have a fc datalogit for a skyline not a celica.

lots of things are bifferent. i understand that the method is the same but he is way to confusing in his way of teaching.

thanks for the link mate as with many more reading i should get it .

I dont use the excell formula to adjust it, will get close but it's not perfect, i just highlight the cell ( cells ) on and around the cells in the inj map and use the " - " and "+" buttons, press it five times and go for a squirt.

i generally use the correction values to see how far up or down it has to go and adjust the values on the map from there. When im getting it close i only adjust the cells on the map to fine tune it.

this is my inj map

400800120016002000240028003200360040004400480052005600600064006800720076008000014.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.514.514.514.514.514.514.514.113.813.513.1144614.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.514.514.514.514.514.513.813.813.813.512.5192814.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.514.514.514.513.813.812.512.512.212.112.1241114.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.514.514.514.513.813.812.512.512.212.111.8289314.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.514.514.514.513.113.112.112.112.111.811.8337514.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.514.114.114.113.113.111.811.811.811.811.8385714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.714.114.514.113.813.912.512.511.811.811.811.811.8433914.714.714.714.514.514.714.714.513.513.813.813.813.812.512.511.811.811.811.811.8482114.714.714.714.514.514.713.914.513.513.813.812.812.112.112.111.811.811.811.811.8578514.714.714.714.514.513.913.913.912.813.513.512.812.112.112.111.811.811.811.811.8675014.714.713.214.513.213.913.913.912.813.513.512.511.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.8771414.714.713.214.513.213.913.513.112.512.512.512.511.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.8867814.714.713.213.213.213.913.513.112.512.512.112.111.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.8964214.714.713.213.213.213.513.112.912.112.112.111.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.81157114.713.513.213.213.213.513.112.912.112.111.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.81349913.813.513.213.213.113.112.812.111.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.81542713.813.513.213.113.113.112.812.111.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.81735613.813.513.213.113.112.512.812.111.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.81928413.813.513.213.113.112.512.812.111.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.82121313.813.513.213.113.112.512.812.111.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.811.8

what do you guys think of this map when looking at the full pull AFR map.???????????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...