Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This thread reminds me of the bashing the blokes over at Performance forums gave my Silvia.. I was saying I didnt think FWD cars where sports cars. All the losers with their FWD Hondas piped up and went on about how shit Silvias are.

The internets such a wonderful reminder of how many dead shits there are in this world :)

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have owned Four MX6's (all highly modified) as i do have a soft spot for them. They are luxurious and fun cars with a lot of options.

I have had a R32 and i have a R33 now so i am in a good position to comment on this.

The best i ever did with my MX6's was a 14.2 and that broke the gearbox.

On the street, 15 is the best they could possibly do.

There is no way they would get past a stock Skyline no matter how modified they are.

As i said, they are a nice car but they are no street racer.

I am a member of the MX6 forums over there so i might reply there too.

Yeah, is pretty funny.. Alot of peple can dish it out, and not really have an understanding on what there talking about.. hehe funny stuff.. Well, anyways.. Im an owner of the mx6.. and to say the least, am proud of the car. I also own my 32 aswell.. And, by far, the mx has no chance over the 32. But, they are both two very different cars.. The mx being a turbo front wheel drive, and the 32 a turbo rear wheel.. Id say the car he beat was a non turbo.. theres just no way he would eb able to beat any skyline.. i know that for fact.. i have done test's.. I must adnit though.. there is one mx6 that does and can beat my 32.. it has slight booost, 3inch exhaust blah blah.. and my 32 being stock, the mx pulls away from the line, and i par with him in speed, but cannot pass. MIght be my driving style.. brass button.. But, to get those sorta times from an mx, ie 14'98, is very good.. not too many can get low like that without major modifications.. As mrrb20 said.. there more of a cruise family car.. they are actually a turbo 626 in two door format. the mx came out from 89-92.. the front turbo models..The only problem they have is severe torque steer.. just somepeople are a bit over eager in there claims i guess..!?

HA HA!!.. just read through it again.. thats the funniest thing ive seen for a long time! HA HA!:bahaha:

I don't know what your sniffing, but it seems that R32's and R33's are now no match for the MX6.
I have witnesses to say that when my MX6 was stock, I knocked off two R33's. One was manual, and it was a battle for a lane, so only a 20 metre run really. The other was a friends auto and we had lots and lots of runs. I had him in every aspect. From 0 - 190.
With the extra boost I'm now sporting, I can say it would be an easy win.
I have very similiar mods to timtx5 who pulls 14.8 1/4 mile. I don't know any stock skylines who can do that.
I've never seen a stock R32 crack anything lower than a 15.4, and the quickest stock R33 I've seen cracked a 14.9 (altho it had slicks) and I frequent the street drags at willowbank.  

So I think your times for skylines are a little off.

Lights go green and off we go, Bye Bye show pony..........
Have you even been in a MX6? I doubt it...  

Why don't you go to bed sonny, you have school tomorrow.

so to lex, where u at boy? if ur in melb id like to see u on the street. but if u got an r32 gts-t ill just laugh at u! man i am in a bitchy mood!

sorry had to do it, for those of you who cant be bothered checking the link..here a a few examples what the thread contains...enjoy...

what a load of shit.

Originally posted by Parag0n

pentae, and also how many keyboard warriors there are, until they meet you face to face, thats a diferent story :wave:

keyboard warriors :bahaha: i want to be a keyboard samuri

Originally posted by mtopxsecret6

Basicly, you have captured clips from both post's.. And, they both dwindled down into a flame against the first gen, and second gen.. tsk tsk.. very stupid..

I think you're missing the point here. It wasn't anything to do with 2nd Gen at all but then again..there were SOME 1st Gen people who decided to dwindle it into a flame. It all started with MX6 1st gen vs R32. And how some twits decide that their 1st gen cars were the supercars of the world.

LOL now that is funny.

I used to own a 88' TX5 2.2 n/a blah blah blah.

I looked long and hard about either putting in a 2.2l turbo motor in it, or just sell it and get a turbo TX5 or MX6.

But for the cost it just wasn't worth it. I think stock they are about 110kw (at the motor !) and in a car full of all the nice gear the weight is up around ~1350kg.

Sure they go 'OK', but I can tell you now that there is no way that a mildly mod'd MX6 (say 170kw) would beat a R33 with just exhaust and a bit of boost.

You just need to do the figures. 170kw and 1350kg (MX6) and say 200kw and 1380kg (R33).

Plus the fact that the TX5/MX6 are front wheel drive and traction is a BIG issue...

I'm not saying the R33's are the fastest thing on the road cause there's plenty of beasts out there, but these guys just think their MX6's are the best thing since sliced bread !!

One day they'll have a proper run against a R32 and R33 and then they'll realise. But I can bet my last dollar they won't tell their mates that they got beaten by one :)

Oh BTW: yes I realised that the R33 was better than the TX5/MX6 and that's why I sold it and bought a R33 :wave:

[/whinge off]

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...