Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

haha what a bunch of dreamers.

My ex had a mx6 turbo with the usualy mods exhaust and pod which she bough off her brother. The turbo on those things are farking small as and 10psi would be the max u could run them at and even then they are slow at best of times. U cant even tell they have a turbo in em when you drive em.

And what about that dickhead saying the fastest time hes seen a r33 do is 14.5 or sumthing on slicks?? who the *** would run slicks with a car that does 14's???

Just thought I'd register and say not all mx6 owners think that. I know that in general terms a r32 r33 or r34 will beat a mx6. Hell ones a rwd turbo 6 and the others a fwd turbo 4.

Its like comparing the 2nd gen mx6 with an s15 silvia. Generally an s15 will beat a 2g mx6.

I like my car but I dont pretend its something it isnt.

my mate comes on these forums under the name of DISZIT. i HAVE beaten him and he has an r33 gtst. he isnt the best driver but neither am i. im not sayin my car is the quickest thing on the road, but i WILL run with a SLIGHTLY modded skyline (ie. 10-12psi, exhaust and filter). id hafta run 15-17psi though. and im sure that i will line up against more than a few even more modded skylines, and get flamed. but i will hold my own in my tx5 turbo. i remember i lined up against an sr20 180sx with 12psi, 3.5inch trust exhaust and filter, and i ran dead even with him till 120km/h (thanks to low boost on launch/10psi on high boost in 2nd gear onwards). a few days later my mate met him, and that race got mentioned. he told my mate wen he was lining me up he was laughing thinking "just another tx5". but then again, ill line up to something alot more powerful and get hammered. hopefully i wil line up against someone on this forum one day who has SOME mods to their skyline... i might win, i might not, but i can guarantee u will be suprised despite the outcome.

sorry for the long post

yeh it does go past 120. and it goes past 180 aswell, unlike some of u skyline boys. cant wait till u get slapped by an f2t! i have a hi flowed turbo, and the limit is 17psi. see fellas its scary, u all judge MY car, yet u havent been in it. ill admit, the only skyline ive been in is my mates r33, but ive been in one. and i wasnt impressed to say the least. wen he gets his exhaust and intercooler, then things will get more interesting! but i got a few tricks up my sleeve.....

up ur sleeve aye

must not be big if there up ur sleeve.

Yet when i read all that crap on ur forums, the guys seem to judge all skylines the same way when they only beat one.

All your really doing now is stirring the lions pit, cause im sure without a doubt that there are skylines on here that would shit all over your car.

I've driven a stock R33 GTS-t and the difference between it and my very mildly moded R33 one is amazing.

R33 GTS-t's really come to life with a 3 inch exhaust and 12psi.

Black_tx5 - remember that a mildly moded R33 GTS-t can be around 170kw at the wheels and the car is around the same weight as the TX5 :) Not saying that your TX5 is slow, but with simular mods it's hard to see past the raw facts.

Cheers

J

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
×
×
  • Create New...