Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys got myself a intercooler package at VMS and just thought all you r33 owners would love to see some pics of the work that VMS have done. This package has made a once sluggy r33 into a bullet and still more mods to come.

VMS is located in Footscray, Melbourne. See David or John if you would like a intercooler package. Just tell em Amit sent you.

Heres the pics below, Comments please.

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well this was custom installation and stuff around the $1600- $1800 mark. But its worth every cent when you hear the intercooler sound and when the car keeps on pulling you back with boost never dropping.

But they have other packages and cooler sizes going for $1200 - $1500 installed and tuned.

I think they split into two pipes just after the turbo so that two pipes go out the engine bay (out both the original send and return holes of the factory cooler) and into the new cooler. From a flow viewpoint, i can't see that splitting it can be any better than one single pipe.

When you split it so close to the turbo, the air effectively fills double the volume, which (when fluid expands to fill a void) will cause a pressure drop. So now we have less pressure (but more flow) along two pipes, with added turbulence at the split (remember this is why when we have a separate wastegate dump we join it back to the exhaust a fair way down from the turbine so there is no turbulence). Compare this to the pressurised flow of a single pipe - higher pressure, but no disturbed flow or turbulence until it reaches the intercooler.

So when the two pipes reach the intercooler, the flow does not have to distribute itself as much inside the end tanks, and it should in theory flow much more distributed across the IC core. However, this is where fluid flow research is at its best - i am sure that HKS, TRUST et al have done hours of flow testing to ensure their endtanks distribute flow evenly across the intercooler core. Many companies both local and in japan believe that this is the key to a cooler that flows well, cools well and does not restrict flow too much - end tank design. So now the single pipe IC has reached the cooler, and if the endtank is designed correctly the air will distribute across the core (with a fair amount of turbulence. This pressure drop and turbulence will occur with both styles of cooler.

So the charge of air passes through the core at a lower pressure and is collected at the other endtank, reducing the volume (to outlet pipe volume) and hence re-pressurising the air. Now what i am saying is a well designed twin entry should perform as well as a single entry cooler, but there is more scope for variation. This system would work better for a very big turbo, as it will keep pressures up and air flow speed up in the twin pipes before the cooler.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry for resurrecting an oldish thread Not much has happened in the past year since the last update. The car did another 1000 miles or so and failed the MOT for the first time in October (failed on tyres which had been advised for a couple of years) In October the car got put up for sale and was removed in November due to no interest, being so close to christmas it was to be expected. The roads were dry in February so I decided to tax it early and get the new tyres fitted.   Fast forward to April, I got someone in to give the car a good clean after sitting for the winter.                                 The car got re-advertised and today (Saturday 3rd May) the car sold. The new owner is planning a GTR conversion at some point and a respray in the same pearl white. It's bitter sweet, it's a shame to have the car sit there for half the year and then only do 1000 miles. The kids are growing too quick and space in the back is getting limited. It's been a great 6.5 years of ownership
    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
    • 2630s work perfectly well. There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big. It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.
×
×
  • Create New...