Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well i think its time i finally post my car up here

finally finished to the way i want it

its my streeter so its got some power and overall I wanted it to be comfortable and nice without going to overboard, but it still gets plenty of attention :D

still yet to take proper pics of it but these will do for now

1989 R32 GTST Sedan

Engine

RB20DET

Garrett hiflow

gtr injectors and resistor

splitfire coilpacks

JJR return flow intercooler setup

full 3inch turbo exhaust and hi flow cat

walbro pump

apexi cam gears

rb26 AP power fc - converted to run on the 20

Gizzmo MSIBC

Standard airbox with blitz panel filter

Gtr bov

MSpec Alloy radiator

HD cushioned button exedy clutch

Suspension & wheels

Largus coilovers (jap brand)

8kg fronts and 6kg rears

32 point damper adjustable

Height adjustable

Rota D2

18 x 9 +30

235/40 goodyear eagle f1 all round

Rays wheel nuts in red

Body

Vertex sides and rear

aero bar with TBO front lip (gloss black)

genuine n1 gtr bootlip (gloss black)

lip front guards and quarters

and flare front guards

also got 8000k hi/low HIDs

Interior

retrimmed headliner in black

seats have the letherette covers in red and black ( lots better than standard 89 cloth trims :))

door trims retrimmed in red

and cyberstork guages in cluster

and apexi el1 boost gauge

dsc00003nt9.jpg

w640.png

dsc00004dy8.jpg

w640.png

dsc00006ub0.jpg

w640.png

56373224mo2.jpg

w640.png

48158065yg9.jpg

w640.png

79862811sl3.jpg

w640.png

frontlipep0.jpg

w640.png

p1010006pa5.jpg

w640.png

lastdynoln6.jpg

w640.png

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/248145-my-r32-gtst-sedan/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
i love this.. looks awesome, where did you get you bodykit from? it looks like an awesome fit..

thanks man

i got it about 3 years ago from andrew(i think?) at kudos motorsport

he was gona use it on a sedan he had ages ago

very nice man, love then wheel choice. very tuff.. boot spoiler looks good too

cheers dude :down:

  • 5 months later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...