Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I'm just trying to confirm a few things I've seen on the forums here recently in regards to the differences between R34 GT-V's, and GT-X's.

I believe it was in a research thread, it was mentioned that the main difference is that a GT-V is basically a GT-T optioned chassis (bigger brakes, and so on), but with an RB25DE (neo) instead of a DET (obviously).

I'm just trying to confirm if this is the case, and if possible, maybe see if I can get a hold of a list of differences between the GT-T, GT-V, and GT-X (and I guess any of the other N/A Model 34's, like the GT25).

The reason is that I'm a p-plater in Melbourne, and subject to the new laws (which means no turbo til after I'm off my P's).

I want my R34 now, and if the above is true, then obviously a GT-V would be a better longer term option, whether I'm turbo'ing the original engine (Thanks 666DAN :/), switching the engine, or just getting into N/A performance.

Is anyone able to enlighten me?

Any help would be much appreciated!

Thank you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249359-r34-gt-vgt-x/
Share on other sites

Here's a bit of reading on the GT-V for you: http://www11.ocn.ne.jp/~skyworks/gtv_specs.html

Personally I would go for the GT-V for the turbo brakes and other handling features. Nissan failed at N/A brakes, and having the bigger R34 4 and 2 pot calipers with bigger rotors from the factory is certainly worth while.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249359-r34-gt-vgt-x/#findComment-4324625
Share on other sites

What you said in your 2nd sentence is pretty much spot on. Thats why I bought one.

I've added links from my research in previous threads over the past couple of years so a search may bring them up as this has been asked before.

Also want to mention the GT-X also comes in a turbo. Alot of people don't know this.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249359-r34-gt-vgt-x/#findComment-4324684
Share on other sites

Here's a bit of reading on the GT-V for you: http://www11.ocn.ne.jp/~skyworks/gtv_specs.html

Personally I would go for the GT-V for the turbo brakes and other handling features. Nissan failed at N/A brakes, and having the bigger R34 4 and 2 pot calipers with bigger rotors from the factory is certainly worth while.

Thank you! Lots of good information :ninja:

What you said in your 2nd sentence is pretty much spot on. Thats why I bought one.

I've added links from my research in previous threads over the past couple of years so a search may bring them up as this has been asked before.

Also want to mention the GT-X also comes in a turbo. Alot of people don't know this.

I did do a search, but unfortunately, my work has a fairly annoying firewall, which stops me from searching properly, and from replying :laugh:

And I have seen the GT-X turbo, does that mean it doesn't have the bigger brakes? Would be odd :D

I will be trying to find your other threads.

Again, thank you guys for this - now I just have to work out 4 or 2 doors, and see what I can find.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249359-r34-gt-vgt-x/#findComment-4328142
Share on other sites

GT-X is equipment trim level - it has no bearing on things drivtrain wise such as HICAS, turbos, brakes etc....

Basically a GT-X is a speced up model of the basic GT such as Xenon lights (usually butchered during compliance), premium audio (please note this is jap spec), rear privacy class, heated mirrors... probably other small things here and there......

GT 2.0

GT 2.5

GT-X 2.5

GTT 2.5 (turbo)

GTT-X 2.5 (turbo)

Essentially a GT-V is the same spec level as a GTT-X 2.5 (turbo) - minus the turbo charged engine and guages.

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249359-r34-gt-vgt-x/#findComment-4337098
Share on other sites

Just a side note on the brakes, i've got stock r34 na brakes on mine and i'm very impressed how it pulls up. I can get abs kicking in quite easily at 110km/hr, so on the street its more than enough. Even with the pads in it, it takes some very spirited driving it get them "fading". I actually think it pulls up harder and faster than my brother r32 gtr (std brakes aswell).

With that being said, once it gets the new engine i've new rotors, calipers, pads and lines for it :banana:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249359-r34-gt-vgt-x/#findComment-4337664
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...