Jump to content
SAU Community

To wang, or not to wang.... that is the question?


Recommended Posts

OK so you've all seen my jiant wang, and told me its too big (but i'm used to that )... So I ordered a stealth wing...

Now everybody says keep the wang.... make up ur dam minds ppl!!!

Here are some pics of the stealth wing, let me know

http://coppermine.e-clips.com.au/thumbnail...ils.php?album=4

And for those of you who havent seen my wang yet, here is a shot of that as well http://coppermine.e-clips.com.au/displayim...p?album=2&pos=2

yeah im up for that :) we havent had a meet for awhile anyhoo, gunna turn it into a coffee table if it come off... although the wang is ahead on votes at the moment, which is a bit of a concern... it is however way behind on exculsive so i might have to add them together, or do some sort of magic mathamatics so the wing comes out victorious, im with every1 else, the wang is rediclous...

Originally posted by SLYWPN

Why dont we organise a SAU BBQ and use your wing as the picnic bench? :)

I have liked the stealth wing for the past 2 yrs, I just prefer to spend my money on power modes rather than cosmetics :).

Ps: Have recently invested money in property, so the turbo/engine upgrade has been put on hold :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...