Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

can it be true that webber future for 2010 is more certain that buttons or kimi's. how did this happen!?! go webber. WDC for 2010. yeah baby.....

ps, there must be toxic fumes in here.

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

can it be true that webber future for 2010 is more certain that buttons or kimi's. how did this happen!?! go webber. WDC for 2010. yeah baby.....

Arsuming can he beat his team mate. I for one will be incredibly surprised if RBR aren't a serious contender next year simply because we all know what Newey is capable of. Having said that though, I'd also be surprised if Ferrari have 2 mediocre seasons consecutively.

Having said that though, I'd also be surprised if Ferrari have 2 mediocre seasons consecutively.

:)

lets not mention '84 to '98 then, where McLaren and Williams took turns making Scuderia Ferrari their bitch for 14 seasons (+ Benetton sneaking one by in '95 with you-know-who at the wheel)

Hahaha I know, I was watching F1 in those days too... Benetton snuck one in there in 94 too. :D

McLaren have always been the most dominant of F1 teams haven't they? Even when stealing technical data from Ferrari and pretty much getting away with it! And some say Ferrari is protected by the FIA or is the FIA... what a fkn joke!!! :bunny:

Funny how the bitch still has more WCC, WDC and more GP wins than McLaren. Williams also have more WCC than Mc too :)

Yeh, reports here in the UK are that he ha agree to the terms and will sign by end of the week...with McLaren. I am not the worlds biggest Hamo fan, but after a year of srapping in 2008, binning it whilst on a podium position with a few corners to go etc etc....well in his 4th season Hamo is going to be stronger again....and Button needs to think carefully about how categorically SMASHED he is going to get beaten next year in a McLaren

In his rookie year the hack Hamo went wheel to wheel with Alonso and circumstances played a part in them only being seperated by one point. Button is still high on his 2009 WDC where he is confusing luck and opportunity with world beating speed.

I so hope this is true as i want to laugh at the 2009 WDC showing how ordinary he is compared to the last 4 WDCs!

Button is still high on his 2009 WDC where he is confusing luck and opportunity with world beating speed.

could not agree more. button has showed yet again that he cares a lot more about cash than he does about loyalty or about winning. he's used his luck with BGP to get the big pesos for a few years at maclaren which will go well until they realise he is no better or worse than any of the top dozen drivers in F1. maybe he'll look good on their Tag watch ads which should in part make up for any deficiency in the car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...