Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just add my 2 cents, the earlier model RB25's (R33) come with hydraulic lifters and the major japanese tuning shops only make cam profiles up to ~264 degrees duration with off the shelf type items for those lifters.

Late model Rb25's (R34 and some lucky R33's) come with solid lifters standard and can run the more aggresive profiles. This includes higher lift and more duration.

Some shops offer bolt in hydro to solid conversion kits - it's not a terribly hard thing to do. Or you can knock off an R34 head. You only need to machine the head if you are chasing more than ~10 mil of lift.. something which most off-the-shelf cams for the RB25 don't have. Also, just because you can't find a specific cam from some honky manufacturer doesn't mean you can't get it.

Bu5ter's car has some wickedly large cams in it, sounds like a rotary at cold idle. There are quite a few cars going around that are meant to have more than 500hp with "only" 264 cams.

Machining the head is not very hard. There isn't much to clear. I have 10mm of lift and there isn't too much to take off. An engine shop would charge SFA to die grind it out. Mahcining the head has nothing to do with duration, just lift.

Converting to solid doesn't give you more lift. Identical profiles for solid and hydraulic show approximately half a millimeter more lift on the solid cam. This is clearance take up which is done by the ramps on the lobe.

i have already an achieveable 450hp atw, so jus looking for complimenting camshafts to enhance it to at least 500hp. Suggestions so far are HKS 256/264 and Tomei 264/264, but has anybody actually achieved this hp with those cams? or are these theoretical statements? We're talking top dollar so i have to be certain what i buy. And not much time, engine is out and ready for cams....

for traction im currently running 11 inch wide street tyres

thanks for the input guys...

Say what....

"Late model Rb25's (R34 and some lucky R33's) come with solid lifters standard"

How come our 1999 model R34GTT has hydraulic cam followers? Have we been jipped?

Hi GT 1, I haven't seen a 50 rwhp increase from just changing to 264 degree camshafts, maybe 35 at best. Bit of port matching and tidying up around the valve guides will get you the extra 20 or so.

Our cams in a customers RB30/25 went from 430hp atw to 570 from putting our cams in.

Goes to show that Aussie Engineers aren't so dumb eh? You don't always have to go to Japan to get parts for your cars. Bad for the economy.

The Japs tend to overdo a lot of things when they shouldn't...

Sorry to say Sydneykid, but I actually bought your solids off an anonymous warfie. He claims since the new RAWS reg's went into place everyone there is going broke and actually have to work to make some money. :)

Here's another R34 RB25 thing... the rods are identical to RB26 ones. Not the same part number, but identical in every other way.

Lukevl

So you are telling me, you changed NOTHING else?! Not the AF ratios, not the Ignition timing, intercooler, spark plugs, boost level, etc... and you got an extra 140RWHP?!

Right, Here is the deal. I will pay you personally, $10 for every additional horsepower these camshafts produce in our RB31DET over 40rwhp. Plus, of course, I will pay for the camshafts themselves.

So, if your claim is true, you stand to make $1000.

PM me when your ready. The catch is, if it only makes 40rwhp, I get the camshafts for free.

Ready when you are, Inbox is cleared.

You don't have to be a complete knob-shine. Obviously the Autronic was retuned. How the hell do you expect to install new camshafts and not alter timing? Are you running a back-yard hick shed labelled 'Tuning House' or what?

Note to all: DO NOT INSTALL NEW CAMSHAFTS WITHOUT RE-TUNING YOUR CAR! IT DEFEATS THE PURPOSE OF PUTTING THEM IN THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE.

P.S> My understanding is that the boost and cooler were kept the same.

Originally posted by lukevl

Our cams in a customers RB30/25 went from 430hp atw to 570 from putting our cams in.

I was only repeating what you said. Maybe the truth is the car was reeeeally badly tuned, before hand, and picked up 110rwhp from a decent tune and 30rwhp from the camshafts.

Obviously I was allowing for the performance increase from tuning (for the camshafts) in the 140rwhp. No extra boost of couse, that would be cheating.

The offer STILL stands, PM me when you're ready.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...