Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 447
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey Rianto,

How much for EBC reds front and rear for R33 GTST delivered to 2112?

Will attend to your inquiry asap, wife just gave birth to our son 2 hours ago!

RDA group buy 48 order list:

- aleks (payment cleared)

- Malz34 (payment cleared)

- G3TFKD (waiting for payment to clear)

- Roland (waiting for payment to clear)

- WTF-33R (waiting for payment to clear)

RDA group buy 48 order list update:

- aleks (payment cleared)

- Malz34 (payment cleared)

- G3TFKD (payment cleared)

- Roland (payment cleared)

- WTF-33R (waiting for payment to clear)

you can send to email: rsoputro at hotmail dot com (replace 'at' and 'dot')

PM also sent....

RDA group buy 48 order list update:

- aleks (payment cleared)

- Malz34 (payment cleared)

- G3TFKD (payment cleared)

- Roland (payment cleared)

- WTF-33R (waiting for payment to clear)

- mind_riot (waiting for payment to clear)

Terry's order added to RDA group buy 48 list:

- aleks (payment cleared)

- Malz34 (payment cleared)

- G3TFKD (payment cleared)

- Roland (payment cleared)

- WTF-33R (waiting for payment to clear)

- mind_riot (waiting for payment to clear)

- tteerrrryy (waiting for payment to clear)

hi mate. im chasing a rotor with the following specs

324x22mm 5x114.3 stud pattern and with a 190mm hand brake diameter (or as close to as possible)

hub diameter is 60.1mm but thats not really that essential

thinking the 350z track rotors might be exactly what im after (322x22..)

if u can find a more suitable match - can u please send me a pm with prices and perhaps the offset of the brake shoe mateing surface from the back of the hat.

this is to suit a custom setup on an ma70 supra.

cheers

Edited by DCIEVE

350Z brembo version has 322x22mm at the rear. 324mm is the front, no rears have 324mm, only 322mm if this is what you mean?

The 324mm is for the front and the thickness is 324x30mm

The total hat height for the 350Z rear 322x22mm is 62.5mm (or 40.5mm if you exclude the rotor's thickness) not sure if that is the right offset you want?

However there are no mention about 190mm hand brake diameter.

Let me know if this match the spec that you want. I don't have data on brake shoe mateing surface, sorry.

sorry, did mean 322mm.

i read this on one of your other posts and gave me the impression that some nissan car/version has 190 mm park brake, which is what i require.

17. V35 Skyline / 350Z track brembo: Available in EBC Gold F=GD7122 324mm, R=GD7123 322mm or RDA Gold F=7685G 324mm, R=7689G 322mm

(Fits all V35/350Z 2003-2004 coupes with Brembo Calipers)

18. V35 Skyline / 350Z late model 2005~ update: F=7965G 320mm, R=7966G 308mm (NOTE: V35 need to upgrade rear park-brake drum shoe to 190mm diameter)

pm sent.

Regarding that note, it's because I've sold non-brembo rear rotors & brembo size rear rotors to early V35 without problems.

Apparently they are all straight fit / interchangeable with 350z.

However I had someone finding out the expensive way that the rear 350z late model 308mm rear rotors do not fit because

he had 170mm rear park drum brake. So apparently either:

a) JDM V35 has smaller 170mm park brake from 2005 onwards; or

b) 350z has bigger 190mm park brake from 2005 onwards.

I have no idea which one of that possibility is true.

If a) is true, then it will solve your problems because that means all rotors for 350Z are produced with 190mm rear park brake allowance.

If b) is true, then the rotors you are gonna order will have a clearance only enough for 170mm park brake...

Update - added fat200sx order & all other payments cleared

RDA group buy 48 list:

- aleks (payment cleared)

- Malz34 (payment cleared)

- G3TFKD (payment cleared)

- Roland (payment cleared)

- WTF-33R (payment cleared)

- mind_riot (payment cleared)

- tteerrrryy (payment cleared)

- fat200sx (payment cleared)

Basho: quote sent..

blyl: check your pm - I need your delivery details to avoid any delays...

RDA group buy 48 list:

- aleks (payment cleared)

- Malz34 (payment cleared)

- G3TFKD (payment cleared)

- Roland (payment cleared)

- WTF-33R (payment cleared)

- mind_riot (payment cleared)

- tteerrrryy (payment cleared)

- fat200sx (payment cleared)

- blyl (need delivery detail)

Are the rotors on it came off R32 GTR or are you just using the R32 GTR calipers?

If the rotors are off a R32 GTR, you can measure the front one's diameter across. If it's 297mm (around 30cm) then it's the early models 89-93

If the rotors are 324mm (around 32 1/2 cm) then it's off a 93-94 late V-Spec II model.

Hope that helps...

Hi

Finally got my measurement, it's similar to the early model but I got it in 290mm.

Now I wonder I might only have the R32 caliper so is that mean any r32 early model rotors would fit for my car.

Thanks for your help

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...