Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, i have a r34gtt sedan and recently had Volks GTC 17 put onto it. but since i get my new rims, my steering wheel will vibrate quite badly at 120km/h onwards! i have done balancing and alignment but it is still the same. i have 215 archilles on the front and 235 neuton on the rears. I think it might be the tyres but would there be anything else causing this?? due to a tight budget, i dont wanna spend 1k+ on tyres and not solving the problem. still on stock suspension and has a front strut bar. Had shitty tyres on my stock rims too but it wasnt doing this. When it vibrates, i can hardly feel the road and have to slow down and even braking, i do not dare to brake too hard. :( anyone having this issue too?

on the side track, i went to a tyre shop for balancing and alignment service and after the service, i went to test the car and still vibrating so i went back to the shop. instead of helping me out, that guy was telling me off for driving at 120km/h and kept insisting that the balancing was good to 110km/h and doesnt see any problem!! and even said if im not happy with his service he can refund me the money in a pretty loud voice!! so much for customer service... :( so i rebutted him saying im preparing for the drags and he said well, if you are going to the drags, u will have to re-balance your wheels again anyway!! wtf!! and the classic part was "mate, you should be expecting this when you had afermarket rims on your car as stock rims are better!!" so much for someone who is selling tyres and rims. He should then stop selling tyres with speed ratings above 120!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/253820-steering-is-shaking-at-120kmh/
Share on other sites

I had the exact problem in my 34 as well.

i had shitty aftermarket 17's that came with the car and when i drove it at first it was fine.,

but when i changed my front tires at the tire shop they couldnt put the stick on led weights because my front calipers were too big

and would hit the weights straight off.

so i went to a few tyre shops. many couldnt help, but i went to one and the bloke smashed the weights like really really thin eventually he got the two fronts nice and balanced..

never had a problem since..

when i had my first balancing at another shop, there was no stick on weights at all and was off by abt 100g each wheel!! lol... but before the 1st balancing, i can only do 90km/h max.. it got better after the 1st balacing at least i could go up to 130km/h but still vibrating on the steering:( i dont want a skyline that can go 130km/p max!! :(

yeah same. at the time my wheels were 70-80 off on EACH wheel

but now shes all sweet. although the steering does shake when im slowing down from 150 + but im pretty sure thats just the rotors needing machining,

i have the same shaking problem on my r32 at high speeds...

"although the steering does shake when im slowing down from 150 + but im pretty sure thats just the rotors needing machining"

wouldnt that be the abs?

hmm... i have got weights as well and has been balanced twice already... so i believe i have done what you have done too.. but still no change. :P as my tyres were brand new with the rims, i cant justify changing it after only 2 months aye... :P:(

if you can feel it pulsate through your foot, or it shakes under braking, its your rotors.

you really shouldnt be doing 120 anyway and i would always say that to a customer when they complained of a noise or shaking at anything over 110... as there is no legal place to test these speeds, its not up to the workshop, if its correct to 110 then hes done his job, anything over and its your problem.

cheap tyres that have been flat or have been pinched on a gutter, etc can have irregularities with the sidewalls and cause a wobble.. tyre pressures can too... do you have a slow leak?? could be a buckled wheel that has had the gutter rash repaired.

swap the fronts to the back.. if it still does it, its a steering problem, if it stops, its a wheel problem.

i have seen wheels balanced before the tyre goes on, with the weights placed on the tyre side of the rim, that would stop it hitting on your brakes, but not as effective.

cheers

Linton

"you really shouldnt be doing 120 anyway and i would always say that to a customer when they complained of a noise or shaking at anything over 110... as there is no legal place to test these speeds, its not up to the workshop, if its correct to 110 then hes done his job, anything over and its your problem."

Unless someone takes it to the track...

i can understand where the shop would come from if they said this but id be pretty shitty as well if my wheels werent balanced properly for a track day, if they are balanced spot on then no matter what speed you do it shouldnt vibrate, but then again im like that, other guys at work get them nearly right and say yeh she'll be ok but i take pride in my work so i get them spot on,

on the other hand tho its a real pain in the ass to balance wheels when the customer doesnt want weights to be visible on the outside of the wheel like with a pair of gtc's

Edited by s13_Skyline_inside

there is balancing and balancing.

Do they have road force balancing machines here? they are more advanced, they run the tire on a

roller simulating the weight of the car, and they can advise if a tire needs to be rotated

on the rim, and finally, they will pass or fail the entire rim and tire as balanced within high tolerance or unworkable

(for example if the tire has an issue due to curbing or whatever, or the rim is really bad).

http://www.gsp9700.com/pub/features/how.cfm

I think if there is a wobble at 120kmh+ there is a wobble at lower speeds as well, just your steering

and suspension is absorbing it.

*stressed* ;) im gonna see if there is any way i can get new rubbers on the car soon and see if that will remove the vibrations... but till i do so, next time im on a cruise, im sticking to 120km/h then.

will rotation be okay when im running 215 on the front and 235 at the rears? will definitely drop by pedders and see what they can do about it. :D cheers mate! hmm, do you think 215 shitty tyres on the front could very well be the cause if the vibrations?? anyway, will try the rotations and a check at pedders and see how it goes. *sigh*

Before forking out for new tyres - how much were those "no-names" anyway? - get the tyres turned around on the rims, then swap sides (ie L->R) so the tyre still rotates in the same direction.

its also very hard for the workshop to create a clay masterpiece if they are working with shit, so to speak.

if you had just forked out for a set of good quality volks, brand new off the boat, and then got them wrapped in some very expensive high quality rubber, the mans job would be very simple.

if you've given him some cheap, worn rubber, on old beat up rims, or even cheap new rims, then he can only do what he can do.

are your volks new or second hand?? are they volks?? ive seen lenso's that someone put a volk logo in the centre caps.

and it will be ok to go down your street with the wheels swapped around.

if youre taking it to the track, then take it to a proper suspension place... or someone that atleast deals with other race cars and fitting semi slicks, etc.

also... one more thing.. look at it from his point... heres a guy, who wants his wheels balanced.. for speeds over 120km as he's going to the track.. yet he has cheap, mismatching tyres front and rear, and doesnt want to spend money for 4 good tyres, of a reputable brand... unless its a beat up drifter.. that story doesnt add up.. if you rocked up with 4 semi slicks to be put on lightweight rims... he might think different and put some effort into it.

again... 110 is the max limit.. so why on a cruise will you be just sitting on 120??

and in all the money your going to spend on going here, going there, turning the tyres around, etc. you may aswell just buy 2 brand new, QUALITY name tyres.

its also very hard for the workshop to create a clay masterpiece if they are working with shit, so to speak.

Or if they are shit.

again... 110 is the max limit.. so why on a cruise will you be just sitting on 120??

You can do 130km/hr on the Stuart Highway in NT. I'd rather find out about potential issues near a metropolitan area than in the middle of the desert. Just because the OP isn't going now doesn't mean he might not go in the future either.

I wouldn't specifically go ask for a "130km/hr alignment" if I were to go again, because I'd (mistakenly) assume that the shop did their job properly in the first place.

If I had some workshop tell me that they'd only work on my car up to the posted speed limit I'd assume they were either incompetent or negligent, and trying to deflect attention away from the fact. If it isn't physically possible to do it then fine (and the tyres he's named are both shithouse and mis-matched, so I'd be inclined to believe it was a hardware issue), but if the mechanical components are capable of doing something with the right setup and the workshop didn't then its a fault with their workmanship or attitude.

If people can't "legally do more than 110km/hr", why would the government bother to explicitly state in the ADR relating to tyre fitment that its speed rating must be higher than the car's possible top speed? Surely you should be able to legally drive any car with tyres rated to 110km/hr if that's your only concern.

If an organisation as dense, and willing to hide behind legal technicalities, as the government understands that you need to ensure all your support components are in place and capable of exceeding the legal speed limit if the vehicle can then so should people who apparently have an interest in cars.

Edited by scathing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...