Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am doing a fresh build and I wanna be sure on clearances. I know some people mostly shops will keep this to themselves but being that I am all the way over here and cannot send my engine to one of you'll competent builders maybe someone can give me an idea of what clearances to use. I have had the block decked and polished along with the crank and I am ready to check ring gapping and want to know what gapping to use on each ring, my power goal is somewhere around 500-600, not crossing 600. I want the build to be reliable and not losing oil due to big clearances. Can anyone advise me what is a safe gapping. This is a stock bored 86mm RB26 and I am using stock CP forgies with RB26 rods. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Jason.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

New engine block or is it just honed? If its new the 86 should actually measure to be a true 86mm bore. Measure it at 3 diagonals at 3 heights down each bore to be 100% sure of each cylinder. They can get it wrong at the factory so its best to be sure. Machine shops get it wrong too.

A honed old stock block will probably measure up a little over stock by no more than 0.001". The loosest you'd want to run the cylinder clearances is about 5 thou. I have heard of more being used on all out drag/nitrous engines but thats not what your building here. The downside of a loose bore is noise that can cause issues with knock sensors detecting piston slap, and also blow by is increased a little. So that can increase oil temps and mean you need to have a good catch can system to re-claim oil and return to the sump.

Bore clearances are generally built into the pistons. So an 86mm piston if measured with a micrometer will actually be 86mm - about 3 to 4 thou. Most pistons ive measured have never been perfectly round (including CP's). Measure at multiple diagonals under the base of the oil ring above where the skirt starts.

0.002" is minimum factory spec which is too tight for what your doing. Id be leaning towards the 2.5-3 thou though considering the engine is going to rev and when that happens the crank will bend and twist to a degree, as will the block.

Measure the crank and the inside diamater of all the assembled rods with the bearings installed at 3 diferent diagonals with a micrometer and not plastigauge. And once youve done this dont mix anything up.

I always measure everything 3 times and write down each measurment. If you get a big diference between the 3 measurements start again till you dont. If you do this right you wont be doing a post in a months time with pictures of your spun bearings on display.

Thanks a lot measure three times and rebuild once. I will check all clearances and this block is a hones one, I will definitely check the bore at different positions to see if the bore is uniform and likewise for the rod bid end clearances and like you said write them down and number then to know everything is accounted for. Will let you know how it goes.

Also what ring gaping you recommend for the different rings, I have read to leave the oil ring as it is but can you give me some insight on what clearances one each of the ring so I can get it right the first time. Thanks.

Edited by TriniGT

Sorry i went off on my own tangent last night. That happens when I post when its late sometimes.

The manufacturer spec sheet for the pistons and rings should recommend a ring gap for various applications. NA applications run the smallest gaps, then forced induction and finaly nitrous. Diferent ring materials also have diferent requirements.

The data in a CP booklet I have here says that for the standard chromoly rings supplied with CP's they recommend 0.007" top ring and 0.008 on the second ring. Oil rings should be 0.015 minimum.

piston to bore: 3-4thou

top ring 15thou

second ring 17thou

cant remember oil rings..

the cp recomended ring gaps are to big!!

for a CP street engine mine are almost the same

piston-bore: 3 thou

top 16 thou

second 18 thou

oil rings more than 15 but no more than 20

i get a great seal with this combo if ran in correctly but leaves a little headroom if the engine see's more boost.

hey V-spec Tomei recommended piston to bore is 1.9-2.2thou!

Trini with that power level id use a little larger

Piston-bore 3.25thou

top 18 thou

second 20 thou

oil rings 16 thou

Edited by DiRTgarage
the shop that honed the block, did they have the CP spec sheet b4 they started?

thats a great question...as any block honing should be measured from the exact pistons used.

i even went to the extreme of taking my measuring equipment to the machinist i use and got him to measure with his equipment and i did with mine so we could compare 'feel' so we knew we were measuring the same.

Edited by DiRTgarage

bingo pauly :sick:

also i'm with the other 2, somewhere between 3-3.5thou piston to bore. also measure all the pistons, and all the bores. you shouldnt have problems with the CP's, but better to check.

1 thing i dont like with the CP rings is the oil control ring, not enough tention for my liking. great for a race engine wanting power, but for a non-smoky streeter grab a set of acl oil rings, cost about $70

bingo pauly :sick:

also i'm with the other 2, somewhere between 3-3.5thou bore to piston, but make sure theyre all the same

1 thing i dont like with the CP rings is the oil control ring, not enough tention for my liking. great for a race engine wanting power, but for a non-smoky streeter grab a set of acl oil rings, cost about $70

Mate im a big fan of the ACL's but no bastard wants to use them. The thick upper rings seal really well...even in big clearanced drag race stuff and as you say the oil control is much better than the CP's as even at 16 thou the CP's tend to 'float' on the bore.

I suppose it depends on the pistons you are using.

My specs are

Tomei 86.5 NON cooling channel pistons

2 thou clearence

GT block

Tomei stroker

Running anything up to 1.8 Bar on GT-RS's

Ring gaps im not 100% sure on so i wont post them up.

I suppose it depends on the pistons you are using.

My specs are

Tomei 86.5 NON cooling channel pistons

2 thou clearence

GT block

Tomei stroker

Running anything up to 1.8 Bar on GT-RS's

Ring gaps im not 100% sure on so i wont post them up.

Yes different manufacturers use different materials that have differing expansion rates so clearances vary.

I just built a Tomei non cooling channel 2.8 stroker (87mm)...i was too scared to use the lower end of the clearance scale with them and as the engine will be seeing reasonable power and boost went 2.2thou.

Edited by DiRTgarage
Mate im a big fan of the ACL's but no bastard wants to use them. The thick upper rings seal really well...even in big clearanced drag race stuff and as you say the oil control is much better than the CP's as even at 16 thou the CP's tend to 'float' on the bore.

yeh them ROSS pistons are pretty good huh

speaking of which, i wonder what acl are gonna do to mahle since the merger

The machine shop said the CPs were one thou over the spec on the sheet unbelievably. He told me he gave clearance of 4 thou, wondering if I should be worried. I am going to be using the top 17, second 19 and oil as a recommended 16 just to be in between what was advised. Didn't think I would get help on this as I know people usually keep these things to themselves so thanks a lot. Will let you know how it goes and should I worry on the piston to bore clearance of four thou?

I suppose it depends on the pistons you are using.

My specs are

Tomei 86.5 NON cooling channel pistons

2 thou clearence

GT block

Tomei stroker

Running anything up to 1.8 Bar on GT-RS's

Ring gaps im not 100% sure on so i wont post them up.

Would love to see how the GT-RS's go on a stroker :P

Completely agree with this!

I ended up giving my CP's the flick in favour of a new set of Tomei's and never looked back

yeah i prefer not to use them either and if i do i supply my own rings, cp's are good but definatley not my first choice. Most of my comp engines running jap pistons (cosworth etc) are set around 2thou piston to bore, ring gaps vary depending on application, even the cp's and arias i set up tighter than they specify.. not quite 2thou though >_< .

No machining should be done prior to having pistons micced up and on hand. Machine to suit then hone to suit indiviual fitment... dont ever buy say 20thou ups and just bore the block 20thou..... it will end in a clunker that breaths its ass off..

Edited by URAS

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...