Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im just wondering how you can get that power with a gt35.. your 850cc injectors must be right on there limmit.

stock valve spings and 30psi? and standard cams. got a dyno sheet so we can have a look?

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's not what I was saying at all. Forget the ET. It's irrelevant. What's a full-weight RB S13 weigh? Not as much as a full-weight Skyline I'd imagine.

My point was that the 128mph doesn't match that car with 600rwhp. That's all.

And dyno figures are about as relevant as post counts.

I love how everyone assumes ideal real world case’s in every single situation. I don’t control dyno calibration. 2 out of 3 where within each other, one was less (lets call the lower one closer to correct) for the sake of this discussion.

Next time I’ll have a rabi over see the dyno :happy:

thats great! so lets see it then? after you get it blessed of course.

See what? a dyno run + Rabi? I’m not actually arguing over the power being right or wrong. It ran a 10.8 at 128mph, it made happy power on a machine I do not control. If 128mph means less HP in real world testing, then so be it. What are we all trying to prove here?

AFAIK the guy I sold it to now runs an auto, keep an eye out at Willow Bank I guess :happy:

And dyno figures are about as relevant as post counts.

I love how everyone assumes ideal real world case’s in every single situation. I don’t control dyno calibration. 2 out of 3 where within each other, one was less (lets call the lower one closer to correct) for the sake of this discussion.

Next time I’ll have a rabi over see the dyno :happy:

All good mate. I believe that your car made 600 and that it ran 128mph. I was just suggesting that the mph doesn't support the dyno.

All good mate. I believe that your car made 600 and that it ran 128mph. I was just suggesting that the mph doesn't support the dyno.

And Ive been suggesting like 90% of dynos its probably incorrect. I thought this was about old mate saying my mph didnt match up with the ¼ mile time, not mph matching up with dyno print off.

2rismo is right.. that mph does not match the time.

jesus what a way to jack my thread..... yea i know your messing antony still not cool though, i always though my car had 640 crank hp back when i ran at 29 psi with 3 degress less timing i put the timing and the extra pound and it did feel like a 30+hp gain, and as for the dyno its a brand new mustang dyno its 1 of the lowest reading dyno's in the us its nick name is the heart breaker..... my freinds gt4092r talon at 38 pounds of boost dyno'd 571 awhp ... normal?? i just dont like it when people think thier stuff is better or more right then some 1 elses just cause of where they live or got it from.... ill get the sheet for you in about 30 mins when i get to the dyno

CYA haters.....

jesus what a way to jack my thread..... yea i know your messing antony still not cool though, i always though my car had 640 crank hp back when i ran at 29 psi with 3 degress less timing i put the timing and the extra pound and it did feel like a 30+hp gain, and as for the dyno its a brand new mustang dyno its 1 of the lowest reading dyno's in the us its nick name is the heart breaker..... my freinds gt4092r talon at 38 pounds of boost dyno'd 571 awhp ... normal?? i just dont like it when people think thier stuff is better or more right then some 1 elses just cause of where they live or got it from.... ill get the sheet for you in about 30 mins when i get to the dyno

CYA haters.....

come on mate.. we aint haters.. we just have different horsepower / kw then you do. Your MPH is about the same as mine and i had only 374kw at the wheels on a proper prepped track.. the MPH tells all.

Your car may have that much hp over there, but over here its a different ball game with different dyno's... we often hear bogus power figures come out of the US that we cannot work out how.. we have the most support - more parts cheaper available to us then anyone else around the world and we been playing with imports longer then anyone else so its not because we do not know what we are doing. Its just the readings that are different.

So tell me how did you go in Chille?

come on mate.. we aint haters.. we just have different horsepower / kw then you do. Your MPH is about the same as mine and i had only 374kw at the wheels on a proper prepped track.. the MPH tells all.

Your car may have that much hp over there, but over here its a different ball game with different dyno's... we often hear bogus power figures come out of the US that we cannot work out how.. we have the most support - more parts cheaper available to us then anyone else around the world and we been playing with imports longer then anyone else so its not because we do not know what we are doing. Its just the readings that are different.

So tell me how did you go in Chille?

thats bs man bring your car 2.5 vs 3.0 pump vs pump ill smoke you, i have 50 hp more then that time i raced and you forgeting the weight diference between our cars and drivers and i dont care if you invented the damn engine dont mean my numbers are bogus

thats bs man bring your car 2.5 vs 3.0 pump vs pump ill smoke you, i have 50 hp more then that time i raced and you forgeting the weight diference between our cars and drivers and i dont care if you invented the damn engine dont mean my numbers are bogus

when you get a low low 10sec quarter and 140ish mph then it will seem more realistic.

when you get a low low 10sec quarter and 140ish mph then it will seem more realistic.

I've been waiting for someone to say that guilt man. Forget the et if his track is as dusty and shitty as he says then its unlikely he'll get the times. The mph is the litnus test tho. 130 doesnt cut the mustard.

No doubt its a tuff car and good luck to the owner/builder but unless the strip is on a 45 degree uphill slope those numbers simply do not equate to 600 plus hp.

when you get a low low 10sec quarter and 140ish mph then it will seem more realistic.

when your looking at my rear lights it will seema little more realistic also, btw the mustang dyno was designed in australia and mustang dyno's software and formulas are made and written in australia

And I’ve been suggesting like 90% of dyno’s it’s probably incorrect. I thought this was about old mate saying my mph didn’t match up with the ¼ mile time, not mph matching up with dyno print off.

100% mate. I was disagreeing with GT and clarifying my point. We're on the same page :-)

I've been waiting for someone to say that guilt man. Forget the et if his track is as dusty and shitty as he says then its unlikely he'll get the times. The mph is the litnus test tho. 130 doesnt cut the mustard.

No doubt its a tuff car and good luck to the owner/builder but unless the strip is on a 45 degree uphill slope those numbers simply do not equate to 600 plus hp.

not good with the whole reading thing are we i ran the 132 trap back when the car had 50 hp less less boost and less timing and my car weighs 1580 kilos with driver

Look Raegan, no one is denying your setup is tough, you have the quickest car in your class in your country and you do it all yourself which is friggin awesome. Its a great credit to you and whoever helped you.

What happened in Chille? post up pics!!! post up dyno sheet as well

and as for you floggin my car... Everyone talked it up and said that to me has learnt the hard way.. besides i am over drag racing i don't even think i will drag race it again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A few small updates since the previous post and lessons. I decided to do a little interior light upgrade on the 110. I quite like the iilumo items, even if they're a bit of a premium over other brands. You'll also note the Stedi Fogs, that will go into the S15 fog lights as I needed to match the bulbs since I got the new ones earlier. I hope they fit as the body is quite a bit longer than your normal bulb.  Annoyingly, I managed to trip the fuse, which normally wouldn't be an issue until I located the fuse. I can't say I've ever come across this. I had lucked out that someone nearby had a spare, but oddly enough Toyota dealerships seem to keep this in stock. I ordered some to keep in my stash and as luck would have it, someone else nearby tripped the same fuse so I passed on the favour.  I also did a little service on the 110 ahead of some additional work coming up. It's been annoying that Goleby's stopped carrying this particular HKS filter for the 110, so now I need to keep them on order from Japan. I also took the opportunity to install a bash plate and number plate riser. The plate riser is such a cheap but nice fix to help really tidy up the car. I'm tempted to now also replace my headlights, on this car. Both items were from Project Aero.    I also needed to replace the rear tyres on the 110, and after trying to get it aligned learnt that I need to replace some bushes in the front end, so that's next.  Closing out this update with a nicer picture as always! 
    • Yeah mate, never miss it.
    • Any going to watch World Time Attack at SMSP this year?
    • Appreciate the correction on the "ground", that will make a huge difference to looking at this. That makes complete sense about AF70/AF71 which is what I had come down to being the issue, one of these. I'll have another look in the ignition wiring when I get a chance next week. I'll also make up a jumper wire for running that AF73 test.  ECU is fine, relay itself is fine, pump harness is fine and the pump itself is fine. I am going to upgrade the Walbro 255 anyway with a DW300 I have since I need to replace the fuel sender and I'm going to upgrade the FPR with my chasebays kit ready for new plenum/injectors/dbw, but I'll get this working first. That's why this is so frustrating. 
×
×
  • Create New...