Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks alot roman.

i would recommend anyone who has modifications on their car to print this out and keep a spare copy in the car, and get very familar with it.

p.s i would recommend SAU do something like sticky these sort of important documents.

i also wanted to raise a important question about the document.

this was taken from section 8 in regards to wheel sizes.

88655027sj6.th.jpg

it states that wheels are determined illegal is they are above 25mm from the wheel spesified on the car OR car series.

what does vicroads clasify as series?

Series of the Actual car (eg R34 GTR or GTT or GT)

or

Skyline series? (R32 R33 R34) would that include the new R35 then?

if so R32s (which came with 15s) could have wheels as big as 20x10 and be legal?

Personally i always thought of it as

Brand = Nissan

Make = Skyline

Series = R32/R33/R34/R35

Model = GTR/GTT/GTST/GT

discuss

Edited by VB-

think about WHY they have these rules and that should help you find an answer. vicroads' rationale is for cars to remain safe and roadworthy by not allowing monster wheels to be put on tiny cars, whose chassis/suspension etc wouldn't be able to handle it properly.

how similar is an r32 to an r35? chalk and cheese, but for the GTR label. i doubt very much you'd get away with it on that basis.

i go by the tyre placard, ie. 25mm wider than the widest rim on there.

think about WHY they have these rules and that should help you find an answer. vicroads' rationale is for cars to remain safe and roadworthy by not allowing monster wheels to be put on tiny cars, whose chassis/suspension etc wouldn't be able to handle it properly.

how similar is an r32 to an r35? chalk and cheese, but for the GTR label. i doubt very much you'd get away with it on that basis.

i go by the tyre placard, ie. 25mm wider than the widest rim on there.

your point about a r32 compared to a r35 is taken is but i think your failing to see the point here.

bigger wheels half the time are used to help handle better. its half the reason why you see monster GTRs with something like 18x11 wheels despite then having no where near that big from factory. wether your using drag applications or track, sometimes you jsut gotta go bigger.

i would like bigger wheels on my car and would like knowing its legal........thats all

Edited by VB-
i also wanted to raise a important question about the document.

this was taken from section 8 in regards to wheel sizes.

88655027sj6.th.jpg

it states that wheels are determined illegal is they are above 25mm from the wheel spesified on the car OR car series.

what does vicroads clasify as series?

Series of the Actual car (eg R34 GTR or GTT or GT)

or

Skyline series? (R32 R33 R34) would that include the new R35 then?

if so R32s (which came with 15s) could have wheels as big as 20x10 and be legal?

Personally i always thought of it as

Brand = Nissan

Make = Skyline

Series = R32/R33/R34/R35

Model = GTR/GTT/GTST/GT

discuss

Always thought it was,

Make: Nissan

Model: Skyline

Series: R32/33/34

In the VicRoads documents, I've always translated the 'widest for that vehicle series' as in the widest that series has got. For example the R32 GTSt's only got 15x6.5" wheels where as the GTR's got the 15x8". The 15x8 was the widest from that series (R32) so you could legally go up to 9" wide (both on the GTSt and GTR) and whatever diameter as long as it's 15mm within factory rolling diameter (total, both tyre and wheel).

No idea if that's correct or made sense, but I always thought it was like that. :laugh:

Edited by adam-__-
thanks alot roman.

i would recommend anyone who has modifications on their car to print this out and keep a spare copy in the car, and get very familar with it.

p.s i would recommend SAU do something like sticky these sort of important documents.

Umm there is one... :laugh:

Its called the EPA/RWC thread in this very section thats been there since Feb 2007.

As for the actual VicRoads VSI documents, there is no point uploading them.

You should always download from the website if wanting to view them incase there are ammendments and so on.

So uploading the to the forum itself would not be beneficial on the chance it proves old/outdated information

Don't quote me as I'm not certain, but back in my FordForums days, I remember everyone saying that they could run XX size and diameter wheels on their base model Falcons etc due to the XR's in that series having XX size wheels.

I think it goes off the largest available factory option for that series. So for example a BF Typhoon came with 18's, but optional 19's therefore you could get away with 21's if the rest of the dimensions were within the guidelines...

As far as translating that to Skylines, it's only really the 34 that has anything 2" bigger from GT-R to GT-T, with 33 GTR's only being 1" bigger than GTS-T's, but that'd still allow 33's to run 19's as long as the widths and tyre sizes were within the guidelines...

Think there's also another rule of any wheel/tire upgrade having to be within 15mm of the largest/smallest factory option wheel/tire package for that car...(included smallest as you can't run 13's on a car that should have 17's etc)

theoretically you were to go on the bases that 15mm was the largest/smallest size package, you could essentially have 25" wheels so long as the tyre is small enough to compensate for the 15mm no?

I think there's more than the 1 rule as far as wheels go...So you might be within the 15mm rule but outside the other ruling as far as wheel size goes...From memory its 2" up/down on the largest/smallest factory option

wat i would like to know is what vicroads clasify as series.

if indeed they look apon series like like dezz said. base model falcons being compared to high end XR6s, it should apply with skylines aswell.

the new R35 sports 20 x 9.5" (front) and 20 x 10.5" (rear) .

which would hopefully mean i can run my 19x11s on my car :laugh:

wat i would like to know is what vicroads clasify as series.

if indeed they look apon series like like dezz said. base model falcons being compared to high end XR6s, it should apply with skylines aswell.

the new R35 sports 20 x 9.5" (front) and 20 x 10.5" (rear) .

which would hopefully mean i can run my 19x11s on my car :laugh:

i think what dezz meant was that you could run the width out of your serries, so if you have an R33, you have to keep to the max width that was available, so that would mean R33 GTR size wheels, plus that 15mm rule

It's all in plain English..

Falcon, say a Ba...regardless of spec it's still a BA series falcon. So if the largest diameter rim is 19 x 35 x 235 from the factory you may go 15mm oversize in rolling diameter and up to 25mm in width.

Skyline, r3- series whatever....blah blah, same deal, regardless gtr,gtst,gts ect you can go 15mm taller in rolling diameter and 25mm wider over factory spec

wat i would like to know is what vicroads clasify as series.

if indeed they look apon series like like dezz said. base model falcons being compared to high end XR6s, it should apply with skylines aswell.

the new R35 sports 20 x 9.5" (front) and 20 x 10.5" (rear) .

which would hopefully mean i can run my 19x11s on my car :laugh:

i think what dezz meant was that you could run the width out of your serries, so if you have an R33, you have to keep to the max width that was available, so that would mean R33 GTR size wheels, plus that 15mm rule

Yep, thats what I meant. Not that you can go off what the R35 has....

So basically all GTS-T owners would go off GTR specs as they're going to allow you to run the largest wheels

As for fords, EF-EL would go off EF-EL XR's, AU off AU (series 1, 2 and 3) XR's and so on

your point about a r32 compared to a r35 is taken is but i think your failing to see the point here.

bigger wheels half the time are used to help handle better. its half the reason why you see monster GTRs with something like 18x11 wheels despite then having no where near that big from factory. wether your using drag applications or track, sometimes you jsut gotta go bigger.

i would like bigger wheels on my car and would like knowing its legal........thats all

yes wider wheels can give you more traction, but what ric is trying to say is that cars are designed with those wheels in mind... so certain suspension components are also engineered to work in with the standard wheels.. and a large change from standard specifications can have adverse affects, such as the wheel bearings.. if you go too wide with a very drastic offset, you'll start to load the wheel bearing beyong thier engineered tolerances! so the limitations imposed by vicroads and adr, are not there to stop you having fun with which wheels you want to put on your car, but as a safety guideline.

^^ or even snap wheel studs and so on if the car is too low and rims dont sit right etc.

There is a can of worms so to speak about all the possible dangers... ye you might not be bad yourself, but this is the majority of society and some of the stuff you see on the roads is a clear reason why these laws are there as they are just dangerous

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...