Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Would a gtr plenum fit with an adaptor plate?? I heard something about the water jackets creating a problem?? any one done this mod before or heard of it??

I also came across a gtr head?? could it fit onto a rb25 and is it worth the hassles for the gains??

thanks

H

Hi guys, RB26 inlet on RB20 bottom end = less power. It is designed for 2.6 litres so all the volumes and sizes are wrong for 2 litres. I have experienced it and Zoom did a fairly big article on it which ended up with the standard inlet being better EVERYWHERE in the rpm range.

Complete RB26 head and inlet on an RB25 is a totally different scenario, works a charm.

Hope that helps

Hi guys, RB26 inlet on RB20 bottom end = less power.  It is designed for 2.6 litres so all the volumes and sizes are wrong for 2 litres.  I have experienced it and Zoom did a fairly big article on it which ended up with the standard inlet being better EVERYWHERE in the rpm range.

Complete RB26 head and inlet on an RB25 is a totally different scenario, works a charm.

Hope that helps

Sydneykid, how do you go about fitting the rb26 inlet to the rb25? do the ports line up and/or are there any problems that need to be worked around?

also how do you go about controlling the 6 throttle bodies? would that create any hassles?

thanks

Dave

my boss used to own a turbo workshop, he did all types of testing with custom plenums shapes, narrow at the rear cylinders this and that and found if you werent running huge boost (50psi+ like the old F1 cars used to) it didnt have problems with cylinders leaning out, since the air is being forced in and preasurising the plenum all the cylinders get the same amount of air, he said it was like filling a bucket up with water, no matter where you fill the bucket up from it will always fill the bucket up, its not like half the bucket is going to fill up more or sooner than the other side.

look at the plenum on the rb26dett, its same shape all the way along.

We recently built a bolt on top half plenum for a VL turbo, and one noticeable difference was an improvement in throttle response. We did fit a slightly larger throttle body (61mm) , and I assume that could be largely responsible. The car was fitted with a front mount intercooler at the same time.

One might assume that with the fitment of a front mount, with all the associated piping and volume from the cooler that throttle response would suffer, but it definately wasn't the case.

VL-plenum2S.jpg

We are working on a bolt on top half setup for a R33 GTS-T now, and I will let you know the results. If we have time, we will compare it to the stock plenum with a 120deg pipe fitted. One thing that concerns me with the stock centre feed plenums is the fact that the air blasts directly into #3 & #4 runners. Although this may not be important on a stock turbo car, you would assume that on a modified car with a larger turbo, etc. the increased air speed could turn this into a problem.

you are correct about pressurising of the #3 and #4 runners not being a problem on a stock motor, start running 30psi+ then its time to start looking a a properly designed plenum.

thats a sweet looking plenum. how on earth do they make those in that shape?

you are correct about pressurising of the #3 and #4 runners not being a problem on a stock motor, start running 30psi+ then its time to start looking a a properly designed plenum.

thats a sweet looking plenum. how on earth do they make those in that shape?

you are correct about pressurising of the #3 and #4 runners not being a problem on a stock motor, start running 30psi+ then its time to start looking a a properly designed plenum.

thats a sweet looking plenum. how on earth do they make those in that shape?

When you are working with Plazmaman, making nice shapes from sheet aluminium is no problem!

Wait till you see the plenum we are building for the RB25....

I'm not so sure even when stock that the factory plenum is that great, on my R33 cyl 4 has the lowest compression followed by cyl 3. Cyl 1 and 6 have the best compression. Cyl 4 is the first to detonate too. One of my R32's showed this to a lessor degree while another showed no difference, but a friends rb20det has the same results (4th lowest) and a couple of others I've tested show similar trends... I can only assume its because they run leaner?

Btw, with the air pooling problem with front facing setups, why can't they be internally baffled to deflect/slow down the air to stop this pooling without buggering up overall flow?

Btw, with the air pooling problem with front facing setups, why can't they be internally baffled to deflect/slow down the air to stop this pooling without buggering up overall flow?

Factory plenums work fine at factory power levels. Most already have humps, bumps, ridges, and all sorts of strange internal shapes to give good air distribution.

Trouble begins when you start trying to force twice or three times as much air through a stock plenum. The air velocities become extremely high, and you are going to get uneven air distribution.

It is a bit unfair to say a stock part is crap because it starts to show some problems at extreme operating conditions for which it was never designed.

Most people have no idea how high the air velocities actually get in a plenum. Try sticking your head out of a jet aircraft at several hundred Kmh, to get a feel for what high velocity air can do. Expecting air at those sorts of speed to go around narrow right angle turns is asking rather a lot.

I wanted to edit that after I had posted it to clarify a few things but got 406 errors or somesuch so gave up...

I'm not saying they're crap, I'm just saying I've noted that trend (compression = 4th lower)which maybe because of other factors, but seems abit too coincidental to me?

My R33 is indeed stock, though I'm sure it wasn't when the previous owner had it, definately had turbo work but I can't expand on that so will leave it at that as its just surmising. The R32's I mentioned are not stock however and were running larger turbos etc and follow the 4th = lower bit.

I think I have enough idea about velocities to skip putting my head out the window thanks :devil:

http://members.optushome.com.au/jay51/Fron...hrottlebody.jpg.

Anybody have any ideas what I can use for a throttle cable in this application. It needs to be about twivce as long as a stock R33 cable. Cable bracket will come off the bracket on the side of the head just below the oil fill cap.

http://members.optushome.com.au/jay51/Fron...hrottlebody.jpg.

Anybody have any ideas what I can use for a throttle cable in this application. It needs to be about twivce as long as a stock R33 cable.  Cable bracket will come off the bracket on the side of the head just below the oil fill cap.

There is a place here in Syd. called "General Auto Instruments" that can lengthen the cables. Their ph. no. is 02 96491442. You need to lengthen it about 50cm. It costs around $70.

RNN14 GTIR, got quoted $40 from a wrecker, mate picked one up for $20.  It looks like a silvia thottle cable might fit too, as they fit on the trust plenums.  RNN14 one is a bit longer though.

The silvia cable won't fit. They are a little tight with the Trust plenum, and that is with the cable on the drivers side of the plenum.

Edit:

I think this is what you need:

R33PlenumMod.jpg

Thanks FORCE that looks just what I need......better placement of the cable bracket than i'd worked out too.

Steve: pulled one out of a Silvia....it was same length as the R33. Which one was quoted at $40 and bought for $20???

RNN14, I have one with my trust plenum, and it is definatley a bit too long for it. It came with my hillsmotorsport plenum, which has now gone. The guy I sold it to, bought the throttle cable for $20 from a wrecker, I got quoted $40 from a different wrecker.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...