Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just curious if it were mentioned about being pulled over unfairly for no reason ?

I have no problem with being defected . Just the annoying aspect of being pulled over all the time for no reason.

  • Replies 231
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah Craig, Neil agrees there aren't enough officers who know what is and isn't delectable, therefore they pull over anyone and everyone with an import. Training is being carried out to fix this problem

As i have already stated above, Neil advised that it "wouldn't be a regular thing"... So anyone with any sense would know there will always be the risk of being inspected. Reuben, Ben and i covered alot in the meeting, and i feel we've given adequate feedback... If anyone else thinks they can do a better job, then friggen go for it!!!!

Apologies if I offended. Must admit I missed Ruby's post and only remembered the clear that up when Neil joins. :P

Rubys -

This will vary from cop to cop, and from cruise to cruise, or individual drivers. But do expect hood popping to occur on the 'odd' occasion if they're given cause to. The upside is, they want to treat us fairer. It boils down to buyer beware ... as mentioned above.

Nenes

Neil said the "hood popping" wasn't going to be a regular thing...

Rubys post states if they are given cause to which is the way it has always been in the past. Cruises etc usually go untouched providing every one is well behaved and there are no complaints from the public.

So is it not going to be a regular thing or will it only be if they are given cause to?

Edited by TheRogue
:) That is the silliest reason I've ever heard! That means me leaving my car to idle for a few minutes is defectable

No. Using a turbo timer is defectable.

People still wont listen even though Martin knows what he's on about

Some people just want the one answer they want to hear. Regardless how many times its explained to them.

Thanks for your input anyway Martin.

At the end of the day it seems easier to try and get along with the police then prove who is right.

Hooray ... the smartest thing I've read yet Joel.

so does this mean i have to keep all my receipts of all completed work by a "PRO" workshop in my glove box????

so if i get pulled over i just show the police officer them and he will be more lenient or even let you off???

i dont bloody think so!!!!

damn if this was true i'd go back to my old topmount set up!!!!

if u choose to modify your car then you take the risk of getting defected no matter what police officer it is, showing receipts wont change anything!!!

I have no problem doing this. Its your pride and joy. How hard is it to keep some paperwork in the glovebox?

You talk like you don't have faith in a fairer system. This is not an all-or-nothing debate. Compromises on each side will be given. Take your chances how you see fit. But there is an opportunity now to generate a better import image.

Exactly, however Ruby is stating is that Neil shows respect for those that 'maintain' and have modifications performed by pro's as it cuts out the backyarder aspect out which 'can' be extremely dangerous.

There's no way of policing the backyarder so by simply stating if mods performed are by a pro (providing the mod is not a major mod) :( then you won't be bent over for stupid little things if it is suspected your car is just a 'little' unroadworthy. i.e slightly too low, tint or slightly loud exhaust.

If the Police decide to do a random inspection at one of the events regardless if people are behaving (which really should have been cleared up at the meeting) those with anything around the turbo area (different turbo elbow, different actuator etc) that doesn't look stock will be pinged. Suspected different turbo is considered a major mod.

The short story is: show some professional conduct in the modifying of your car and the police will show professional conduct and fairness in the inspection of your car.

Things were discussed at the meeting as we saw fit. Surprise inspections were discussed. If you wanted a bigger say in it, you should have made yourself available at the meeting. Cops have the right to inspect your car ... our concern we voiced was about the training of the police conducting those inspections, not when and where they are performed. If police are better trained and take a club's reputation into consideration, they'd be a bit more relaxed on cruises and be less inclined to pop bonnets. Neil indicated that cruises will be treated more as "monitoring" rather than "inspecting".

Rubys post states if they are given cause to which is the way it has always been in the past. Cruises etc usually go untouched providing every one is well behaved and there are no complaints from the public.

So is it not going to be a regular thing or will it only be if they are given cause to?

Stop making your head spin by running circles around what we've been saying and misunderstanding it. Hood popping isn't going to be a regular thing, but there will be the odd occasion when it is required by the police. It is up to them to decide, whether due to an obviously unsafe car showing up at a cruise or simple suspicion. I don't write their job description. I'm not a cop and I'm not Jesus, so this isn't the word of God. ;)

Can we stay focused on the topic please! We've been given an inch, and some people want a mile. Lets take this movement in the right direction in small steps. Its not a discussion about your car and your car only, its about the SAU community as a whole. :P

Edited by RubyRS4

Now your heads spinning. :thumbsup:

Regardless of your previous post stating to expect hood popping on the 'odd' occasion if they're given cause to its along the lines of what Nene stated.

As you have 'now' stated its not going to be regular but will occur on the odd occasion. When organising events where Neil will be invited please make sure this is is in bold right up the top as it is unfair for those who don't know any better to cruise along with their car that is tastefully modified only to have it defected as it has engine modifications.

As I stated above Ruby; its mega easy to tell if a car has a highflow, so simply looking out for those that might be unnecessarily stung.

Now I'm at work and got some brekky in to me. :thumbsup:

Its all good Ruby/Nene props for the efforts.

As long as people are well aware hood popping may occur regardless if people behave then all will be fine. Its then up to the individual if they wish to take the risk when attending a sapol notified cruise/event.

But all is good. As long as people are well aware there shouldn't be too many problems or whining when they do get defected. :)

However over time as a relationship builds it may get to the point where SAU is left alone and inspections are a thing of the past. Providing every one is well behaved.

Edited by TheRogue
Now I'm at work and got some brekky in to me. :)

Its all good Ruby/Nene props for the efforts.

As long as people are well aware hood popping may occur regardless if people behave then all will be fine. Its then up to the individual if they wish to take the risk when attending a sapol notified cruise/event.

But all is good. As long as people are well aware there shouldn't be too many problems or whining when they do get defected. :)

However over time as a relationship builds it may get to the point where SAU is left alone and inspections are a thing of the past. Providing every one is well behaved.

Exactly :thumbsup:

I'll probably get flamed for typing this..... btw this is not directed at anyone in particular

Car = Weapon whether we like it or not

There are design regulations for a reason and I don't get this whole 'I'm scared of hood popping" thing. If my/your car is in COMPLIANCE with the law and regulations (as it should be) why would I/you be worried about hood popping.

I don't have illegal mods on my car and I am a law abiding member of the community (no, I'm no saint either) with no convictions or warrants, so why do I care if I get pulled over. I don't care because I have nothing to hide

Maybe someone can explain why there's a fear of 'hood popping'...? I understand that we have uneducated police that are likely to defect you because they don't know, but realistically anyone here that's done an illegal mod to their car is bright enough to know that there's a chance you're going to get caught and defected because it is in fact illegal sooner or later

I'll probably get flamed for typing this..... btw this is not directed at anyone in particular

Car = Weapon whether we like it or not

There are design regulations for a reason and I don't get this whole 'I'm scared of hood popping" thing. If my/your car is in COMPLIANCE with the law and regulations (as it should be) why would I/you be worried about hood popping.

I don't have illegal mods on my car and I am a law abiding member of the community (no, I'm no saint either) with no convictions or warrants, so why do I care if I get pulled over. I don't care because I have nothing to hide

Maybe someone can explain why there's a fear of 'hood popping'...? I understand that we have uneducated police that are likely to defect you because they don't know, but realistically anyone here that's done an illegal mod to their car is bright enough to know that there's a chance you're going to get caught and defected because it is in fact illegal sooner or later

I agree.

Regarding the hood popping. I believe it is more of a fear of the outcome of the hood popping, of either (a) being defected unfairly; or (b) knowing you're going to be defected.

In the case of (a) above, the said driver might have a totally stock car, but fear that the officer inspecting under the bonnet doesn't know what he is looking at and will send the car to Regency anyway to let them find the suspected illegal mod.

In the case of (b) above, the said driver might have some major mods under the bonnet and fear the officer knows what he is looking for, and will subsequently defect the vehicle and send it to Regency.

The meeting with SAPOL will iron out inconsistencies and make the (a) scenario much fairer. Hood popping will occur less, and when it does occur the driver's car will be inspected fairly. However, if you have major mods, (b) still applies :thumbsup: If police are better trained and not left to suspecting a mod (and add to that, the driver has documented evidence of carrying out a mod correctly, professionally and safely) then there will be less fear of police and the dreaded defects.

Addressed by Ruby. :thumbsup:

In addition you may drive around depending on the area you live/drive for many years with engine modifications and may not be defected. Attend an event that you know police provide inspections and one would have to be silly. :)

Really nothing more needs to be said on this matter I feel its cleared up.

Edited by TheRogue
I agree.

Regarding the hood popping. I believe it is more of a fear of the outcome of the hood popping, of either (a) being defected unfairly; or (b) knowing you're going to be defected.

In the case of (a) above, the said driver might have a totally stock car, but fear that the officer inspecting under the bonnet doesn't know what he is looking at and will send the car to Regency anyway to let them find the suspected illegal mod.

In the case of (b) above, the said driver might have some major mods under the bonnet and fear the officer knows what he is looking for, and will subsequently defect the vehicle and send it to Regency.

The meeting with SAPOL will iron out inconsistencies and make the (a) scenario much fairer. Hood popping will occur less, and when it does occur the driver's car will be inspected fairly. However, if you have major mods, (b) still applies :thumbsup: If police are better trained and not left to suspecting a mod (and add to that, the driver has documented evidence of carrying out a mod correctly, professionally and safely) then there will be less fear of police and the dreaded defects.

So it's basically what I was getting at with these uneducated police. That's fair enough, I can understand that.

Lets hope that something does come from all this and that police are going to be better educated when dealing with imports. It's still a shame that they don't target commondore drivers in the same manner.....

It's still a shame that they don't target commondore drivers in the same manner.....

Ahh but they do.. VL Turbo's are harassed to no end. Simply because the cars are so easily to obtain power from and so easy to make modifications to.

Its the nature of the car. A cheapish turbo car will always be harassed as it is a performance car easily modified and can be a deadly weapon in the hands of an inexperienced driver.

Edited by TheRogue
So it's basically what I was getting at with these uneducated police. That's fair enough, I can understand that.

Lets hope that something does come from all this and that police are going to be better educated when dealing with imports. It's still a shame that they don't target commondore drivers in the same manner.....

How do you know they don't?

How do you know they don't?

When I listen to Leon on the radio in the shed and they talk about hoons and high powered cars they're always talking about imports. Its on the news too mate! When I see a car pulled over with the hood up and it's not often..... 99.9% of the time it's an import.

I'm not saying they don't touch commodores, but I think you get what I'm on about.

Correct me if I'm wrong and you know that commodore dickheads get the same treatment import drivers get, because if they get the same treatment I'll gladly put my hand up and admit I'm wrong

Ahh but they do.. VL Turbo's are harassed to no end. Simply because the cars are so easily to obtain power from and so easy to make modifications to.

Can't say I've seen a VL turbo pulled over but fair point

Its the nature of the car. A cheapish turbo car will always be harassed as it is a performance car easily modified and can be a deadly weapon in the hands of an inexperienced driver.

Any car is a deadly weapon, powerful or not experienced driver or not. Even the best of the best make mistakes....

This shouldn't be a tit for tat issue lads, ignore the commonwhore driving bogans in their V6 commys and lets focus on us and what we have to do to get the heat back off of the import community then the police might focus more on other things...

A clear line of communication between cruise organisers and police is a good thing. I always involve our police in planning cruises and have never had a problem. One cruise the police met us at our destination and chatted with us. We already had all our 'hoods popped' so they could have a look...all the cars were modified to some extent. No fines defects etc. Im currently in the early stages of orgainising a cruise where the Blood Bank 'donormobile' will meet us and we will all donate blood...im going to ask the coppers to attend and match us 'pint for pint' per person.

Edited by DiRTgarage

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...