Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 231
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This meeting waz a good idea

i would love to know what waz legaly defectable and what waznt..and have the cops know that aswell so their is no grey areas.

hope this all works out well in the end

lol.

1 person of status disagrees, watch everyone jump on board.

ive said it before, ill say it again, stop trying to fight the law, you will lose.

lol that made me think of this:

But honestly, everything has now been said and done, why argue points from 3 weeks ago?

It really doesnt matter how good the relationship is with SAPOL and who knows who.....

The fact is organised car cruises represent a gathering of people with generally illegally modified cars that are getting together to show each other their cars, talk cars, and finally drive their cars. Rarely do people with totally stock Hyundai Accents go to these cruises because they dont give a damn about their cars...

To the Police organised cruises represent a rare opportunity of shooting fish in a barrel by ridding the roads of a potential menace, congestion, and anti-social car behaviour. While this might sound damning I cant remember being on a car cruise in the past 20 years where multiple traffic violations havent occurred. Now be honest with yourselves and who hasnt given it a squirt alongside their mates on a cruise, thats part of the fun, right?

And so is SAPOLs determination to stop these gatherings and the resulting activity. You drive an illegal car, you invite the Police to your cruise, they will defect you. They see roadworthiness as your safety as well as their job, and really they should have explained that you. No amount of brokering deals will ever change this, its all been done many times before, and will be again in the future. The result will always be the same.

Enjoy your modified cars, but be sensible enough not to do it in groups if you dont want to be defected. Go for drives meeting up somewhere out in the country, and then keep it to a minimum. Dont drive through built up areas or the cruise strips attracting unwanted attention. Rather than trying to change the law, its time to change your thinking....or keep playing the defect game. As one old Copper told me in the past "Try as hard as you want mate and put it through stock again, we will just keep pinging you every time we see you....and we ALWAYS win. You will get sick of it before we do".

Know what? He was right :ermm:

i honestly agreez with mr donnon

no im not the most sensible out there, far from it, but im stoppin how i look at things due to recent events, as said before like it or not the cops will win

its like snakes and ladders

u build the car up, and they come along and bring u back down, then u go up again and u fall even harder the second time, hell i never won a game of snakes and ladders and it like that with an import

but for the real hard passionate drivers, not the cruising type of people, but the 80 km/h+ sidewayz people, and i know there is a couple on here

SAVE IT FOR THE TRACK and buy a car dedicated for it

thankyou :)

moral - BUY A TRACK CAR, OR SAVE UR PASSIONATE SKILLS FOR THE TRACK

and i wont use hooning, coz if you know wat ur doing and had practice, ur not a hoon, ur a skilled/passionate driver

R*K are hoons

Its unfair for us to expect the police to believe you've done your mods safely and correctly if you're not qualified for the job. Producing invoicing for work completed or at least 'safety checked' by a pro is the fair and proper way to do things. There are alot of dodgy mods out there and they are unsafe, you know this. You can't ask for special treatment because you "know what you are doing". These have been famous last words. The police would like to see evidence of a qualified professional doing the job. I love working on my own car, but I also love ensuring everything is right and safe. I have no quarrels at all with having most or part of the work completed by a pro. It only commonsense guys. Before you go bombarding Neil with trivial questions, push your pride aside and try using a bit of commonsense first.

innocent til proven guilty, they should have to prove its unsafe, we shouldnt have to prove its safe. unfortunately it doesnt work like this, we have to pay $130 just to prove our own innocence even if we havnt done anything wrong.

the defect system is an absolute disgrace and until its fixed some police will continue to abuse it, i think its great that we are working with a few police officers, but if we think for a second this will make any noticable difference on the streets we are kidding ourselves. maybe as far as SAU cruises are concerned there might be a bit of releif, but the hour or 2 i spend on a cruise once every few weeks is hardly going to make a difference to the many hours a day i spend on the road having to take special "anti-police" routes, having to position myself between cars in my lane to hide my car from police cars going the opposite direction and having to spend every second on the road searching for police cars, just so i can limit my defect count to only a few times a year instead of more.

im sorry, i just dont beleive the problem can really be solved until the defect system is fixed, which i dont see happening any time soon as it is cost efficient and doesnt affect the majority of the public, and nobody gives a shit about the hoons, they deserve to have their cars taken off the road, so why change it?

like i said, any cooperation between us and sapol is a step in the right direction, i just dont think people should be rushing out of their bomb shelters just yet.

It really doesnt matter how good the relationship is with SAPOL and who knows who.....

The fact is organised car cruises represent a gathering of people with generally illegally modified cars that are getting together to show each other their cars, talk cars, and finally drive their cars. Rarely do people with totally stock Hyundai Accents go to these cruises because they dont give a damn about their cars...

To the Police organised cruises represent a rare opportunity of shooting fish in a barrel by ridding the roads of a potential menace, congestion, and anti-social car behaviour. While this might sound damning I cant remember being on a car cruise in the past 20 years where multiple traffic violations havent occurred. Now be honest with yourselves and who hasnt given it a squirt alongside their mates on a cruise, thats part of the fun, right?

And so is SAPOLs determination to stop these gatherings and the resulting activity. You drive an illegal car, you invite the Police to your cruise, they will defect you. They see roadworthiness as your safety as well as their job, and really they should have explained that you. No amount of brokering deals will ever change this, its all been done many times before, and will be again in the future. The result will always be the same.

Enjoy your modified cars, but be sensible enough not to do it in groups if you dont want to be defected. Go for drives meeting up somewhere out in the country, and then keep it to a minimum. Dont drive through built up areas or the cruise strips attracting unwanted attention. Rather than trying to change the law, its time to change your thinking....or keep playing the defect game. As one old Copper told me in the past "Try as hard as you want mate and put it through stock again, we will just keep pinging you every time we see you....and we ALWAYS win. You will get sick of it before we do".

Know what? He was right :)

perfectly put, agree 100%

I disagree.

To the Police organised cruises represent a rare opportunity of shooting fish in a barrel by ridding the roads of a potential menace, congestion, and anti-social car behaviour. While this might sound damning I cant remember being on a car cruise in the past 20 years where multiple traffic violations havent occurred. Now be honest with yourselves and who hasnt given it a squirt alongside their mates on a cruise, thats part of the fun, right?

Then you've obviously been on the wrong cruises. As a matter of fact, I haven't seen you attend any SAU cruises that I've been on in the last 12 months. All the cruises I've attended (and organised) have not once resulted in any defects or traffic violations. We are discussing SAU cruises and the SAU reputation here. Your observation is just that: "your observation".

In any case, the concern is with defects and the fairness of defect, not "multiple traffic violations". Keep on topic please.

Nisskid is right, the defect system needs to be fixed, and Neil has informed us that the wheels are turning to fix that problem.

Already been said by my self. I'll stop repeating, thats it from me. :)

Yep ... I'm tired of repeating myself too. Some people are not listening ... their ears are only open to what they want to hear. So I've said enough and had enough. Its easy to lead sheep when you feed them what they want. Try to make a difference and people get all negative and disbelieving.

If everyone wants to live in a box, thats fine by me. Some of us are trying to make a difference. Others will never believe, and would rather watch FnF over and over again :)

Edited by RubyRS4
If everyone wants to live in a box, thats fine by me. Some of us are trying to make a difference. Others will never believe, and would rather watch FnF over and over again :)

I think you need to take your own advice on some other topics.

I think change is great but it all last awhile and then goes back to the same old system.. A few of us have been around for a long time in the car scence and have seen this all before..

When I see the changes then I will believe!

:)

Other topics? We're talking about the defect problem in SA, not NSW. I don't see many members putting in the work to make a change. And I've been around the car scene long enough too (20 years) thank you. You haven't noticed changes in 20 years? I pity you.

Stay on topic please.

Edited by RubyRS4
Then you've obviously been on the wrong cruises. As a matter of fact, I haven't seen you attend any SAU cruises that I've been on in the last 12 months. All the cruises I've attended (and organised) have not once resulted in any defects or traffic violations. We are discussing SAU cruises and the SAU reputation here. Your observation is just that: "your observation".

In any case, the concern is with defects and the fairness of defect, not "multiple traffic violations". Keep on topic please.

then you either have memory loss problems, or are lying.

ive been on 3-4 SAU organised cruises and every time have seen traffic violations, "prominent" members of the SA SAU giving it a squirt over the speed limit, burnouts from lights, no indication between lanes, short drag races and you realise when you do a "tunnel" run and everyone slaps the exelarator that is noise polution and therefor against the law, and isnt that even a hoon law now?.....

so either open your eyes or dont lie

This thread is never going to go well due to there are people that sit on two sides of the fence.

Even if you do talk to one cop "Neil" it doesnt change the fact that the rest of the police force in SA will start thinking the same..When they pull you over they do so on there own judgement!

All modifications are illegal due to the car didnt come out with them from factory so if you modify you run the risk..

I have learnt like Martin you cant win and the safe way to go is get a daily car and take your hi powered car off the streets - to Drags or Track!

maybe the next step is to start making movements to mod plates? talk to local MP's or senators, there is no logical reason why we shouldnt have these plates in SA, the cops still get there revenue and we get to feel that little bit safer

Nisskid is right, the defect system needs to be fixed, and Neil has informed us that the wheels are turning to fix that problem.

good to hear.

Then you've obviously been on the wrong cruises. As a matter of fact, I haven't seen you attend any SAU cruises that I've been on in the last 12 months. All the cruises I've attended (and organised) have not once resulted in any defects or traffic violations. We are discussing SAU cruises and the SAU reputation here. Your observation is just that: "your observation".

i think what he is saying they occur, not that they get pinched for them.

Thats how screwed the whole thing is....if you cant be truthful to yourselves ie. some if not ALL SAU members will break the speed limit on a cruise (which is why cruises exist in the first place).....then dont ever expect to pull the wool over the cops eyes either. Remember when you were a little kid and heard Fairytales at bedtime? Ever heard of 'Little Red Riding Hood' - "Oh what big teeth you have Constable Neill"

Now put him to the test and show me I am wrong... :wave:

Make sure you have wireless Broadband so you can post from the waiting room at Regency Park......

Edited by Martin Donnon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...