Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cool thanks for clarifying. its a minor defect..

Anyone go a stock r33 s2 exhaust i can borrow?

Maybe it might be better to get your exhaust fixed, for such minor mods you dont need such a free flowing exhaust, all its going to do is get you another defect, next time it will probably be a full rwc, you got off easy this time.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4432944
Share on other sites

Hey guys, am a bit confused what to do here, most of the stuff are back to stock the only thing is my muffler still looking for a stock muffler. I check on vicroad web site and this is what they state; I have not recived a letter from the EPA and i dont have a defect sticker on my windscreen??

How do I clear a Victorian defect notice?

The defect notice will specify what you need to do to clear the defect notice. One of three types of requirement will be stated on the notice:

  • Self Clearance - You are responsible for repairing defects mentioned in the defect notice and you must sign Section 8 of the Defect Notice once the defects have been repaired. You will also need to forward the "blue" copy of the Defect Notice to VicRoads.
  • Clearance by VicRoads - You do not need to obtain a Certificate of Roadworthiness. However, you must present the vehicle for inspection to a VicRoads Customer Service Centre to ensure that the defects are rectified and the Defect Notice is removed. No appointment is necessary.
  • Certificate of Roadworthiness must be obtained - You must present a Certificate of Roadworthiness obtained in respect of the vehicle, dated after the date of issue of the Defect Notice, at a VicRoads office. You must not remove the defect label. If the label is present, the vehicle must be presented at a VicRoads Customer Service Centre for removal. If the label is not present, ie where the windscreen was replaced or where a label was not attached, the vehicle does not have to be presented.

Defect notices issued by the EPA cannot be removed by VicRoads. The defect notice will state where to go to get the defect notice removed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4444169
Share on other sites

If you have not recived a letter from the EPA then your fine and Thank god you didn't get one either cuz they are ahead f**k.

To clear the defect you have to do all the mods on what the notice has told you to do and take it to a VIC Roads centre, there is usually like a 'drive in' where you park your car, swtich it off and wait for a VIC Roads officer to come out or you go in and ask an officer to come out.

Give them the notice, let them read it through and let them see that you have done the changes.

If you pass they will tell you and remove the defect.

Your free to go!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4444418
Share on other sites

How about this part on Vicroads website

Certificate of Roadworthiness must be obtained - You must present a Certificate of Roadworthiness obtained in respect of the vehicle, dated after the date of issue of the Defect Notice, at a VicRoads office. You must not remove the defect label. If the label is present, the vehicle must be presented at a VicRoads Customer Service Centre for removal. If the label is not present, ie where the windscreen was replaced or where a label was not attached, the vehicle does not have to be presented.

I dont have a defect sticker do i still need to take my car in for inspection?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4444637
Share on other sites

Sounds like the pig gave you a half ass defect...

So he didn't give you a yellow sticker, but he wants you to goto a mechanic to get a RWC (Road Worthy Certificate) then present it to VIC Roads saying your car is fine.

Get a RWC done from your mechanic, take it to a VIC Roads Centre, explain to them the situation when you got pulled over and present the RWC and the write up from what the pig gave you to tell you want needed to be changed and see how you go.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4444662
Share on other sites

Cool thanks for clarifying, my next question is; when i go and get a RWC do they need to do a full standard inspection? like tyres, windscreen wipers etc or do i just tell them about the defect get them to check it and write it on the certificate? I got quote $100 bucks for it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4444728
Share on other sites

Depending on the write up on what the cop gave you...

Was is a major or minor RWC needed?

You only go according to the write up cuz there is no need to fix anything else unless stated on the write up sheet.

In your defence, only give whats needed, cop tells you to fix this, then only fix that, nothing else otherwise you be wasting your time.

Major = Full Inspection, Minor = Standard Inspection, or whatever the system is... Your mechanic will know what to do if its a Full or standard Inspection.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4444758
Share on other sites

on the defect sheet the minor box is tick.. Cheers for that, at least now i know what to say to the mechanic, coz when i went to the mechanic the first time to get a quote he said that we needed to to this, that and everything..

Cheers mate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4444815
Share on other sites

They are simple to take off.

Wet a rag, warm water, hold it to sticker for 5-10mins re-soaking the rag every few mins

Thing should peel off.

Or just take it off soon as the cop drives away, and then stick it on with sticky tape... that isnt legal though... as technically your removing it, but then if its still there then perhaps not as its still "there" :down:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4445572
Share on other sites

Or just take it off soon as the cop drives away, and then stick it on with sticky tape... that isnt legal though... as technically your removing it, but then if its still there then perhaps not as its still "there" :down:

I went with that option, but it is still in my glove box.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/257525-defect/page/2/#findComment-4445577
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...