Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you're all a bunch of assheads!!!

i was happy using Vortex all this time after switching from Ultimate.

then yesterday i stopped in at a BP, coz i couldnt get this thread out of my head !!!

i'm almost positive its all in my head, but the car feels better under initial and full load.

here we go again !!! thanks fkrs :P

They're all the same. Especially if it's tuned it doesn't make a difference I use them all mines tuned no noticeable difference. please read hpi's fuel test results in their older mag the silver gtst with gtr engine. They tested vortex, ultimate, vpower and synergy and boost 98 (although this had ethanol so it ran better obviously) and autosalon mag backed it up when they tested it also.

E.g. Person a (for a$$) says I've got a drift wing it makes my car more aerodynamic therefore faster

Gullable sau forum members say omg that's fully sick hectick it must be true*goes out to buy drift wing*

Just like fuels it doesn't make a difference

LOL

yep. all the same. the biggest differences you'll get will be from batch to batch and servo to servo. some servos may only do a low volume of 98 ron fuel and have fuel sitting their for longer. some servos may have more contaminants in their holding tanks than others.... etc. but the main point is as it is when it's delivered there is bugger all difference between the main 98 ron fuels (BP, Shell, Mobil, Caltex).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I hadn't thought about the variable power steering assist. Presumably, it will always be the same level of assist as you get in an S14. The R32/3/4 are either helliishly heavy (at low speeds) if the solenoid is not powered at all, or hellishly too light (at high speed) if it is powered all the time. I presume that it is PWM controlled on those cars. I hadn't thought about the S cars not having variable assist. ugh. What crappy plebby cars they must be!  
    • Hmm yeah that is a good point. It looks like it'll just bolt in with no real issue besides maybe the bushings being different. My other concern was that 2 pin plug that I assume is used in some way to control the rack solenoid depending on the speed signal from the ecu. The DMAX rack doesn't even have that plug though so, don't think it'll matter. Might just order the rack and see how it goes. Will update this when I figure something out
    • I'd say it's a fair bet that the feed and return fluid lines will be in different enough spots that you would need to come up with a way to cut the originals short and adapt with new hard line adaption or braided teflon hoses or somesuch. But really, you have the car, you have the photos of the DMAX rack - you should be able to go out there and see for yourself whether they're in the same or different spots.
    • I've been doing some looking around and honestly was just considering throwing a new rack at it. I saw that the dmax silvia rack bolts up into the 33 with the silvia bushings but not sure if the high pressure lines will sit in the correct spot. I believe other version of the 33 rack are the same/similar to the racks that can be opened up without as much fuss so I assume the dmax rack would fit but any ideas?
    • I've never played with one, but I would expect that you are correct. That slot looks like it is intended to be used to unscrew the end, and the flats on the body would be better than grabbing it around the round bit with a pipe wrench. So, yeah, probably unscrews. You'll probably have to make a tool to drive in that slot.
×
×
  • Create New...