Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah i'll take one. email me with details, i got a 2003 V35 two door, i live in Geraldton WA

Hi Paul,

I had sent the email to you yesterday. The parts is been sent out by Courier Please shipping company. It take about 5 working days to deliver from Brisbane to WA.

Cheers,

ADam

  • 2 weeks later...
So what are the results?

"Well I did the dyno test. My car is "Stock". Did 3 runs, I got 163kw on 2 runs and 162kw on one.

I couldn't put the Spacer on becasue the car is too hot, I'll put it on tomorrow then do another run on monday.

Here are my results of my best run"

post-60315-1238763782_thumb.jpg

post-60315-1238763793_thumb.jpg

post-60315-1238763803_thumb.jpg

Ok. Just put the Spacer on and went for a drive........

can't hear any sound difference or feel any power difference.

If there is it must be small.

I'm also guessing that if you have better intake, pod fillter and exhaust then you would notice the difference in sound and power. But since i don't we will wait for the dyno test monday.

Just thinking... it looks like not one small mod alone will give you any noticeable difference in power but when you have a combo of mods the gains seem to show.

Pic of the spacer and cover on..... and the hood closes...just

post-60315-1238819617_thumb.jpg

in the instructions it said i didn't have to.

But i'll do it anyway.......if i knew how

I'm not sure what the story is with V35s but with my old R33 there were two methods of reseting the ECU:

1. disconnect negative terminal and pump the brake pedal until all charge is lost, this should drain the charge quicker and reset it,

and

2. there were a couple of pins that you could short from the console test socket for a few seconds while the key was in the Ign. position (but this you'd have to research if possible with the V35)

So did you go off that YouTube video as a reference for installing Paul?

Edited by Pulp

To install i used this link http://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread/274245

Didn't have to reset the ecu :devil: all worked

Ok the results were good i got an extra 7kw to the wheels

Check it out :thumbsup:

post-60315-1239018009_thumb.jpg

post-60315-1239018022_thumb.jpg

post-60315-1239018034_thumb.jpg

cool excellent mate! good to hear! :devil:

I think I will definitly be doing this, I have already got the exhaust and intake done so hopefully will add a little more power to the mix... :)

The people who make the spacer say that with there exhaust and spacer you can get 18hp to the wheels so with an intake aswell you could have some real noticeable power gains

Oooo.... and i get my bodykit this week too :thumbsup:

Nice 7kw @ the wheels is a good gain for such a basic mod on a NA engine :)

look foward to picking one up for my car when I have some spare cash to splash... got to build a new home computer 1st

Hi mate,

We got that in stock. last 10 to go for the next shipment. The price $390 Plus shipping.

Cheers,

Adam

Nice 7kw @ the wheels is a good gain for such a basic mod on a NA engine :)

look foward to picking one up for my car when I have some spare cash to splash... got to build a new home computer 1st

hi mate,

Thank you for posted the dyno graph on here to let everyone know about the gain you got. Hope you enjoy the products.

Cheers,

Adam

cool excellent mate! good to hear! :)

I think I will definitly be doing this, I have already got the exhaust and intake done so hopefully will add a little more power to the mix... :down:

yes mate. with skunk2 intake plennum and combine with other mod like air intake system and the exhaust system will gain more than normally.

Cheers,

Adam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...