Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Geez that is f**king ugly!

I think 99% of the time an aftermarket body kit can absolutely ruin the looks of a car as will gay looking rims. IMO it's better to keep stock rims then to go for aftermarkets just ffs, having said that though there are plently of rims out there that will finish a car off nicely if chosen well. Depends what you like really though.....

needforspeed-skyline.jpg

how sweet is this body kit?... i know its hi profile bt id definetly luv to have tht kit on my r33... any1 know wher i can get one??

I'm going to come out and say that I don't mind this... ...It is always good to see someone try something extreme... ...Innovating even... ...and if it wasn't for people like that we wouldn't have alloy wheels... ...Turbos... ...All wheel drive... ...etc...

Saying that... ...I'd really like to see what the rear of this car looks like... ...I always find that when I'm stuck in traffic it is the rear of cars that really needs to look good... ...Because that seems to be the par of the car that everyone sees more than anything else... ...And I think that's why I don't like fords... ...their asses look shit...

the 90's are well and truly gone but people persist with wide body kits and tri-spoke rims... common people get your act together! the only way that r33 could be worse was if it was painted in chameleon paint.

It is a '90s car after all...

You could put a wide body kit on an EH Holden... ...But it wouldn't suit the style of car... ...Just like a supercharger would look out of place on a Skyline...

Yes... ...The work done to this car is over the top... ...but as a total package it looks fine... ...I doubt this was put together to be driven around as a daily... ...Or even a "weekend warrior"... ...It's really just a rolling billboard and whether or not we like it as a car... ...It's doing its job...

c70 rear quarters and what reminds me of a VK commodore grille <<< for that reason alone it should burn.

Tri spoke Advans were always ugly, it's just lots of people have bad taste.

I mean, you wouldn't decorate your house like Graceland...But Elvis thought it was cool.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
×
×
  • Create New...