Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Don't have the AFRs mapped on the dyno sheet but here are some basic pinouts of the AFRs 4th gear:

RPM AFR

3000 13.8

3500 13.2

4000 12.6

4500 12.4

5000 12.3

5500 12.0

6000 11.4

6500 11.3

7000 11.0

7500 10.8

8000 10.7

The engine is an R33 RB26 stock except:

Boost - 12psi

3" exhaust no cat

Blitz pod filters

310 RWHP

Are the AFRs down low too lean? The car makes full boost by about 3500rpm so ideally,shouldn't the AFRs be 12:1 at this point???

I noticed most dyno sheets here uses speed instead of rpm on the horizontal so it's kinda hard for me to interpret them.

Where in the rpm range on full load do tuners aim to get afrs @ 12:1 ???

Thanks again guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/259212-r33-gtr-afr-too-lean/
Share on other sites

stop bumping your thread. and do some research. 10.7 at the top end is actually very rich. to me it just looks like a regular standard ecu with more boost than stock. that is what they do. it's leaner at low RPM as it comes out of cruise (closed loop) mode.

stop bumping your thread. and do some research. 10.7 at the top end is actually very rich. to me it just looks like a regular standard ecu with more boost than stock. that is what they do. it's leaner at low RPM as it comes out of cruise (closed loop) mode.

like i said previously 9 out of 10 dyno sheets here uses speed instead of rpm, so it's difficult for me to read them accurately....

And yes i know the top end is rich. My question: Is it ok to to have it so lean at full boost until about 5500rpm where afrs then come to 12:1 ???

bump... your thread wasnt even there for 3hours... relax.

Anyway - those AFR's sound safe, lots of tuners are going leaner, simple look @ the dyno thread would show it.

CRD and a few others are known for it

he just explained it was safe as above

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...