Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok well the good things are that they go straight in, handy if you have a full exhaust system including a dump pipe that goes to the factory 6 bolt flange. Only issue ive heard is that they are a little bit down on power due to the redesigned exhaust housing that lets them bolt in?

Water lines need to be adapted etc but that is a relatively small issue.

Vehicle - 1997 Nissan Stagea RB25DET Auto

Modifications -

Aftermarket exhaust system from turbo back

600x300x76 Greddy FMIC

Turbosmart Boost Tee

Turbosmart dual port BOV

CAI fed completely shielded K&N pod filter

Pretty certain i would have to step up to an E-boost too or other type of EBC in favour of the Tee, and upgrade injectors as ive seen that these peak out duty wise once you start running larger turbos.

I dont really want to have to pull the engine down or even take the head off at this stage, is the main thing. Should i look at cams? even just the exhaust cam or an adjustable cam gear to help lower the spool RPM?

Thanks guys.

EDIT - the car in question is NOT the 260RS in my signature. cheers.

I thought you were currently Nissan-less?

This the same? http://www.gcg.com.au/turbo/ViewProduct.aspx?ProductID=202 pretty much GT2835 Pro S spec, cant check inabox, capped haha

I dont have the 260RS anymore... it was sold to fund the deposit on a house and the restoration of an old aussie muscle MACHINE haha..

Im having to drop back to an RSfour. Trying to sneak some modifications in under the missus' nose.

R31 Nismoid no they use a different rear housing to allow it to bolt directly to the 6bolt flange. Ive heard this is what causes them to be a lil laggy but ive seen the two (original and HPiaB versions) next to each other and i dont see anything that would greatly impede the flow of exhaust gasses...

WOuld it be a better option to go something different completely, and run a different dump pipe to suit? Im just chasing a low mount replacement that offers decent power and power delivery without creating to many hassles. now is that TOO MUCH TO ASK!?!?!?! GOSH!!!!

sorry....

Ryan im picking up an RSfour next week that is pretty stock standard save for some wheels and suspension. Fresh canvas.

Well buy it if you must - but when you come back posting about boost control problems dont say people didnt warn you. Two people have in two posts... its not good odds.

If you dont want hassle... garrett rear housing... its not hard.

then buy dump to suit, again, not hard. it all has to come off to be fitted

be happy

Well buy it if you must - but when you come back posting about boost control problems dont say people didnt warn you. Two people have in two posts... its not good odds.

If you dont want hassle... garrett rear housing... its not hard.

then buy dump to suit, again, not hard. it all has to come off to be fitted

be happy

Do they come in IW and will they fit under a stock turbo heat sheild?

Bobert, link me the new one ;)

[link]http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/category12_1.htm[/link]

Its the 7th turbo down the page.

Boost control problems would be a wastegate issue nismoid? Thats why you recommend an externally gated unit...?

Not sure if they fit under the shield ryan - they are a lil bigger.

[link]http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/category12_1.htm[/link]

Its the 7th turbo down the page.

Boost control problems would be a wastegate issue nismoid? Thats why you recommend an externally gated unit...?

Not sure if they fit under the shield ryan - they are a lil bigger.

The questions were for ash(as he had a GT30 i think), and the link request was for the stag haha

[link]http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/category12_1.htm[/link]

Its the 7th turbo down the page.

Boost control problems would be a wastegate issue nismoid? Thats why you recommend an externally gated unit...?

Not sure if they fit under the shield ryan - they are a lil bigger.

No, boost control issues with non genuine GARRETT housings...

Nothing to do with external gate

No, boost control issues with non genuine GARRETT housings...

Nothing to do with external gate

So do garret make an internal wastegate housing?

and do the GT3071/76 fit under the standard turbo heat sheild?

Have to search under GT3071R IW or GT3076R IW , I'm told the propper GT30 integral wastegate turbine housings were developed here in Australia and look very similar to the turbine housing on Fords XR6 turbo cars .

In that case they're used on a GT3582R , personally I think they are intended to be GT30 turbine housings but some are machined out to fit GT35BB turbines/turbos .

People here like Mafia/Cubes are using them and I posted pics of the bare housings when they became available in Sydney a couple of years ago - don't have the link sorry .

I would always use a genuine turbine housing given a choice because the manufacturer designs the housing to work with their turbine - they are a matching set say like a 16" wheel with a 16" tyre .

I'm not going to rag anyone but it's easy to see where producing a generic turbine housing and machining it to suit various diameter turbines will cause problems , because like the 16" rim example you may guts a 15" tyre onto it but its not the way the engineers intended it to work .

The usual problems with generic turbine housings is elevated exhaust manifold pressure (TIP or turbine inlet pressure) which shows up as what people call "boost creep" - the wastegates inability to bypass sufficient volume of exhaust gas to "throttle" or control turbine speed (compressor as well) and therefore boost pressure .

The best gas flow situation is to use the turbine/turbo manufacturers matching family of turbine housing but even then the housings A/R ratio has to be right as in not too small .

Search here under GT3071R and GT3076R because there are some long strings and lots of peoples R and D you can benefit from .

Beyond the scope of this thread but Garrett is tooling up to make a bolt on version of the GT3071R and GT3076R for the the Evolutuion 10 Lancer . The big news is that their turbine housings will be twin integral (internal) wastegate and twin scroll available in 0.73 and 0.9x A/R ratios .

Sadly the mount flange style is not split "T3" but if adapters or a custom manifold were on the cards it'd be real hard to beat on a road car .

Hope this helps , cheers A .

i have a 3076 .82 IW on my 25. got told by the company i bought it from i'd have massive boost control issues with IW but i gave it a go anyway. i think the most important thing is having a big bellmouth dump on it. i made one up with a mate with lots of flow around the gate area and with a 12psi actuator it holds 12psi perfectly

the "bolt on" gt30s have a machined out rb25/vg30 rear housing to make it bolt on. even machined out to their max they're still not really big enough to work properly. definately get a genuine garrett rear housing.

and the stock heat shield fits with some modification, i just bent myne a little bit and screwed it onto the manifold shield, works pretty well

Has anyone used this one from tweakit.net? http://www.tweakit.net/shop/product_info.p...roducts_id=6598

Its got a garrett 5-bolt dump rather than the Nissan 6-bolt dump. Would that help with the boost control issues?

Trick is to run the .82 IW.

If you wish to run the .6 or .7 RB style 5 bolt turbine housing or .6 Garrett xr6t style you will have issues with boost creep.

To help with boost control the best method is to run a nice big bell mouth. The splits tend to improve gas flow of the turbine wheel while due to the 'typical' split design it reducing the available area 'around' the wastegate flap.

As the flap opens it partially blocks the dumps wastegate pipe, not good for a turbo that is running a flapper sized borderline for its application.

HPIAB I can recommend; tweekit have never got back to be on several occasions when querying their products so sadly I cannot recommend them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...