Jump to content
SAU Community

Inner West Crew Whoretown (toowong/st Lucia/kenmore/indooroopilly And Sometimes Sunnybank?)


Recommended Posts

I feel they are both good Col, the single player in BF3 took me a little over two days to finish (probably 5 hours playing time...)

MW3 is a continuing story and so fare has been about 7-8 hours of gameplay and still says under 50% into it!!

Multiplayer can EAD as the young idiots just bolt around committing suicide to get their points up and then sit on a hill with a rifle and do nothing...

So Zoom carwash in greenslopes for Thursday who's keen?

I would be, except my car is already clean and sitting under a car cover in the garage to keep it that way :D

I feel they are both good Col, the single player in BF3 took me a little over two days to finish (probably 5 hours playing time...)

MW3 is a continuing story and so fare has been about 7-8 hours of gameplay and still says under 50% into it!!

Multiplayer can EAD as the young idiots just bolt around committing suicide to get their points up and then sit on a hill with a rifle and do nothing...

I am so over games that are all about online play.

Get BF3 on a PC it's fantastic. My mate bought MW3 n I'm not that impressed.

I was fixing my pc last week, and it shat itself....

so no pc games for a while until I decide to get another desktop. The laptops wouldn't run the game to a satisfactory level.

The reason I really dislike MW3, apart from the lag, and the very badly designed environment, is that it is becoming like BF3, and it encourages camping.

I liked mw2 and black ops because it was Commando style, run in, kill as many people as quickly as you can before you are blasted yourself.

I cannot be bothered sitting somewhere waiting for people to run into the sight of my scope. If I wanted tactics I would go back to playing non alcoholic chess.

think I might call it a day shortly

Got MW3 on the day it came out, and have hardly played it.

Personally think it's a bucket of shit. Lag is attrocious, and the maps are terrible.

BF3 doesn't look much better either. Might get Skyrim or Dead Island instead...

Dead Island is cr*p, don't bother.

RE Carwash: Meh, I'll go wherever. Chermside is better :P

Mangs & Mangettes who wants to donate to my Movember fund? Donate Here Follow link and show your support. Martin donate enough and I'll see about that bikini car wash lol

Still at work until these guys clean my server room.

RE: Games - I bought BF3 the day it came out, played BF2 and had high hopes for it. After I finally got it to install I think it's pretty good, I haven't really played to much of it but I think I'm close to the end now. I think last mission I did was where the main bad dude died on the plane after you rescue him.

MW3 I'm not too phased on, it looks more of a console shooter than a PC game. I have only played the modern warfare series on 360. Call of Duty 2 though, is still hands down one of the best games I've played on PC.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...