Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Fellas,

My R33 GTST will be tuned soon, I got an RB30 bottom end put on it with a GT3540 0.82

My mechanic is aiming somewhere around 370rwkw mark, however, I do remember somewhere that the Z32 AFM maxes out at like 320 rwkw?

Is this correct?

If so, and it does max out, does this mean I will have to purchase a new ECU and sell my PFC? Or is there a more powerful AFM on the market?

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/261493-z32-afm-alternative-help-plz/
Share on other sites

This one maxes out at 500PS (368kW) - http://www.nengun.com/tomei/air-flow-meter-z32

Is that at the engine or at the rear wheels?

Also, is a VH45 AFM bigger and better than the z32? What does that max out at?

I believe the Z32 nengun is selling is the same as the one I got, it's just that Tomei sell them, they are still a genuine nissan part.

Thanks

Alternatively if you split the inlet to 2 pipes, fit an AFM on both pipes, the air flow through each flow meter will be half, so effectively each one would only need to be rated to half the power output (370/2 = 185kw) Effectively you could get away with 2 RB20/25 AFM which are relatively cheap in comparision.

Since the PFC is now only seeing half the airflow you will have to half the injector sizing to keep your AFR the same.

VH45 AFM would be the easier option

Edited by daisu
Alternatively if you split the inlet to 2 pipes, fit an AFM on both pipes, the air flow through each flow meter will be half, so effectively each one would only need to be rated to half the power output (370/2 = 185kw) Effectively you could get away with 2 RB20/25 AFM which are relatively cheap in comparision.

Values in rwkW:

RB26 single - 149 / twin - 299 / 65mm diameter

RB20/25 single - 226 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Z32 single - 255 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Q45 single - 302 / twin - 605 / 90mm

Values in rwkW:

RB26 single - 149 / twin - 299 / 65mm diameter

RB20/25 single - 226 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Z32 single - 255 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Q45 single - 302 / twin - 605 / 90mm

Well I knwo for a fact that's incorrect, when I had my GT2835 Pro S setup, I was making close to 280rwkw and the Z32 was no where near maxing out....

Are your sources credible, where are you obtaining this information from???

Mine was doing 5v at 302rwkw and prior 4.8v at 270rwkw. 444 injectors maxed at 250-260rwkw and needed fuel pressure to get to 300rwkw.

320rwkw with 5.1v. :D

That nengun link - Tomie is just a Z32, 500ps/hp is 'little' over 300rwkw.

I've also seen a Q45 max out earlier than the Z32; not sure what was up with that.

Same dyno the std rb20/25 afm was maxed a little over 180rwkw.

I'm moving away from afm. Looking in to the ViPec 'possibly' there still appears to be a few little niggly's with them though.

Even if the afm is max'd you can still bodgily tune it. The problem is there needs to be a little head room so on those cool nights it doesn't lean out or det.

Edited by TheRogue
Even if the afm is max'd you can still bodgily tune it. The problem is there needs to be a little head room so on those cool nights it doesn't lean out or det.

I am currently running my standard afm at 110%, tuner does not like it though.

Another option that i have seen is to put the guts of the z32 into a 4" pipe, therefore you will have more volume at the a certain flow.

Edited by W0rp3D
I know of 2 25's making 330 plus at 4.9 volts with z32's, I've also tried a q45 that maxed at much less power!

forgot to mention they were both running e85, most likely getting a bigger bang for each gulp! it's so tuner friendly it wouldnt matter if the afm maxed out.

I am currently running my standard afm at 110%, tuner does not like it though.

Another option that i have seen is to put the guts of the z32 into a 4" pipe, therefore you will have more volume at the a certain flow.

I did that and don't really like it. I would at the very least put it in 3.5" pipe instead of 4". It's tough to get to idle correctly, and it's real twitchy at part throttle stuff. We tacked a 2.5" length of intercooler pipe inside the 4" intake pipe around the hot wire and it seemed to help some, but it's still more trouble than it's worth. If you don't want to go MAP, I would look at Ford Lightening MAF's. They also make upgraded MAF's for Lightenings that are supposed to have digital processors and something like 4 or 8 hot wires with a big X in the middle to cut down on turbulence that are good to over 800rwhp that idle like a dream. I'm trying to find them now. Anywho, they are 0-5v hot wire sensors and retail for somewhere around $300 USD IIRC.

Values in rwkW:

RB26 single - 149 / twin - 299 / 65mm diameter

RB20/25 single - 226 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Z32 single - 255 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Q45 single - 302 / twin - 605 / 90mm

This is not right. There are quite a few Z32's with 320RKW + that still use a Single MAF

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...