Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So the 2.6 is actually over cammed for its capacity?

Steve that IS 390 rwkw (and on stock injectors). Lol first posts states rwhp.

I am in Canberra but the car was tuned at Insight Motorsport. The Superlap Tilton Evo was there while my car was getting tuned. Thing is a weapon (obviously) and beautifully put together.

Scott is tuning the car eh...good stuff. When were you there? I was in there Friday...did you see the Rotorbishi?

Edited by DiRTgarage
  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Scott is tuning the car eh...good stuff. When were you there? I was in there Friday...did you see the Rotorbishi?

Scott, his Dad, and Greg are great. Very professional outfit. They were all sharp despite having pulled incredible hours to get the Evo ready. Scott told me today that they were on the Evo until 6am on Saturday too but you can tell they live for it.

I was there on Wednesday and Thursday.

Did see the Rotorbishi, amazing peice of engineering. Couldn't stop crawling over / under it .

Im sorry 390rwkw with r34 n1's amd stock injectors, something isn't adding up here

thats because its hp

so you saw the Rotorbishi...but did you hear it?

Edited by DiRTgarage
thats because its hp

so you saw the Rotorbishi...but did you hear it?

OK for the record;

The car runs 600cc nismo inj and produced 390 rwhp as per the first post and as Paul has indentified.

As for my statement ...'Steve that IS 390 rwkw (and on stock injectors). Lol...' please note the Lol as it clearly can't be the case.

Didn't hear it but saw the size of the frigging exhaust. Got to push the thing in and out of the workshop a couple of times, was fun with that set up, never had a flyweight car feel like 1700 kg before. Unfortunately that was the extent of its rotorvation.

OK for the record;

The car runs 600cc nismo inj and produced 390 rwhp as per the first post and as Paul has indentified.

As for my statement ...'Steve that IS 390 rwkw (and on stock injectors). Lol...' please note the Lol as it clearly can't be the case.

Didn't hear it but saw the size of the frigging exhaust. Got to push the thing in and out of the workshop a couple of times, was fun with that set up, never had a flyweight car feel like 1700 kg before. Unfortunately that was the extent of its rotorvation.

so it only needed 3 rebuilds instead of 6 :cheers:

I'm still putting money on the turbos are getting to their efficiency...

The N1s are good on a stock RB26 at around 24PSi...

Now you're pushing 17PSi through...

So an absolute pressure of 31.7PSi...

Now add in the fact you're ingesting an extra 15% of that air, rather then it being a restriction...

So you're really pushing ~37PSi...

Take back off the 1 atmosphere...

You're pushing around 22/23PSi "comparison" wise...

But you have to think, at the same time, when you push 15% more air in, you're pushing MORE then 15% more air out... (Heat, expansion, yada yada yada) you're just pushing those poor turbos WAY past their efficiency range...

Get the maps out, and do the maths... Those turbos are out of their league!

A friend pushes his at 24PSi on a stock capacity 26... Makes 320AWKW... And it makes it up near 6500RPM...

You may "only" be making 300AWKW in yours... But you have to think, you're making it at a LOT lower RPM if you're running outta power at 6250... Which means, you're making more torque... So you're using more fuel, and air (Less restriction, same boost level, more air flow... :( ), at a lower RPM...

TURBOS ARE OUT OF EFFICIENCY... Logic says it...

i haven't tried to look at the maps yet.

the way i sse it is that boost pressure is broadly related to what speed the turbos are being turned at - whether it's an RB26 or RB30 sized pump moving the exhaust gas. so i think i should be able to get 23 or so psi out of them either way before seeing a big hike in inlet temps. the fact that the 30 will push 15% more air just means that it should get to the 23 psi level at lower engine rpm.

i don't expect / want them to make more than 430rwhp, but while not wishing to compare dynos i'm a fair bit shy of that with 370rwhp at 15psi, remembering that he didn't want to run it at 17 psi due to inlet temps. injectors are 660cc so i think they should cover my needs pretty well. the head has some minor porting.

there has got to be some inefficiency raising the air temps. i reinstalled the heat shields over the stock exh manifolds as the amount of heat rising onto the twin turbo pipe is fairly substantial. might be worthless but we'll see. i'll try and post a dyno chart and also temp data.

you will not be loosing power if the temps are below 50 degrees.... ulness you arnt running a intercooler????? 20 odd psi and 300kw is the norm.. so thats not bad power from 1.2bar..

asked for the inlet temp data but didn't get it. def running an intercooler. still drops off at 6250 ish though, would like to retain legs through the gears so cams are prob a must anyway.

scott is still adamant that it's cams.

lined up to check pressure drop and temps on a local dyno.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...