Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

FYI People

Just heard that channel 7 is at an accident scene ATM gathering footage of a red R33 that has taken out a stobie pole on Port Rd.

We're going to be completely F#*Ked if this doesn't stop for at least 6 months.

EDIT!!

Apparently it was a 32 not a 33

Edited by D_Stirls
FYI People

Just heard that channel 7 is at an accident scene ATM gathering footage of a red R33 that has taken out a stobie pole on Port Rd.

We're going to be completely F#*Ked if this doesn't stop for at least 6 months.

not watching the new atm, is it severe? or just injuries?

hope its not a speeding incident :P

ted180, I was prepared to overlook the fact that you were posting a banned members thoughts in a post.....up until the cheap shot.

So as Andrew said earlier about monitoring IP's, posting thru another member is no different......banned means banned!

You have therefore scored yourself a warning and you can thank Nisskid for that........for anyone else wishing to post banned members posts.....don't do it, otherwise what's the point of even giving someone time out?!

FYI People

Just heard that channel 7 is at an accident scene ATM gathering footage of a red R33 that has taken out a stobie pole on Port Rd.

We're going to be completely F#*Ked if this doesn't stop for at least 6 months.

Hope they are okay and like Unit Zero said hope it wasnt a speeding incident.

A Skyline aint the only car which can take out a stobie though......

Edited by 93GTST
Hope they are okay and like Unit Zero said hope it wasnt a speeding incident.

A Skyline aint the only car which can take out a stobie though......

That's not the point though because you can bet your ass that isn't what the news will be saying tonight.

That's not the point though because you can bet your ass that isn't what the news will be saying tonight.

Yeah thats right, what you just said is what I meant. Maybe I should have used a different choice of words :P

EDIT -

Your post was fine up until that line.

I honestly don't see what was wrong with that, it was a genuine disclaimer, last time he posted about defects it was misinterpreted as a personal attack on sled, to remove any doubt he made sure it was known it had no subliminal value. It was either post it as is and risk another misinterpretation, extending the ban, or making it clear it wasn't a personal attack, seemed like the responsible thing to do.

Ultimately, you can't really expect to ban a member for a 100% innocent post that you misinterpreted, and not expect to leave a bitter taste in their mouth.

I honestly don't see what was wrong with that, it was a genuine disclaimer, last time he posted about defects it was misinterpreted as a personal attack on sled, to remove any doubt he made sure it was known it had no subliminal value. It was either post it as is and risk another misinterpretation, extending the ban, or making it clear it wasn't a personal attack, seemed like the responsible thing to do.

Ultimately, you can't really expect to ban a member for a 100% innocent post that you misinterpreted, and not expect to leave a bitter taste in their mouth.

Well I'm not getting into the nitty gritty of your beef, however for some reason you (nisskid) were banned - now if you don't like that, you can always appeal to the other mods of the board, I'm sure they will hear you out and decide for themselves if sled was being out of line. Or, sometimes its easier to just cop the holiday and let things pass naturally. It would have been a 100% innocent post but you mentioned his name - I take this as a baiting... there just simply wasn't any need for it.

And ted, you probably should have known better than to post for a temporarily banned member... but it seems like you only ever post negative comments these days so I doubt my words would mean anything to you at this stage.

-D

I don't give a rats about the content......DONT POST ON BEHALF OF BANNED MEMBERS!!
ted180, I was prepared to overlook the fact that you were posting a banned members thoughts in a post.....up until the cheap shot.

So what cheap shot were you referring to then?

Well I'm not getting into the nitty gritty of your beef, however for some reason you (nisskid) were banned - now if you don't like that, you can always appeal to the other mods of the board, I'm sure they will hear you out and decide for themselves if sled was being out of line. Or, sometimes its easier to just cop the holiday and let things pass naturally. It would have been a 100% innocent post but you mentioned his name - I take this as a baiting... there just simply wasn't any need for it.

And ted, you probably should have known better than to post for a temporarily banned member... but it seems like you only ever post negative comments these days so I doubt my words would mean anything to you at this stage.

-D

The 100% innocent comment that he was banned for never mentioned his name, it had nothing to do with SLED. This is the post that he was banned for:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4511506

He was banned on the grounds that Sled thought the post was subliminally directed at him as a mod.

You be the judge.

The 100% innocent comment that he was banned for never mentioned his name, it had nothing to do with SLED. This is the post that he was banned for:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4511506

He was banned on the grounds that Sled thought the post was subliminally directed at him as a mod.

You be the judge.

Actually he was banned for the posts leading up to post #57 (on page 3) as well I suspect some PM arguments that were previously alluded to.. it just so happens that sled didnt respond to it until you'd already posted again, an estimated duration of 6 hours difference. like I said, I'm not going to get into whether or not either one of you are right, simply because I just don't care. However if you have an axe to grind against any single mod, speak to the rest of the mods and make an official complaint. Fighting in public is undignified.

-D

and there we go the opening story on Channel 7, i only saw the last 15 seconds though but they were questioning the power and availability of the performance import vehicles dues to their low cost. They claimed than Vinh's WRX only cost $11,000.

Well done Nene.. This looks like a step in the right direction :P

Tho Neils comments seem broad and normal but him making the contact is atleast nice..

Has Neil helped out on any cruises yet that SAU has organised?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...