Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im about to upgrade my Injectors and am probably going to get Nismo 555cc items but have noticed that the Sard ones are a little cheaper even with the collars.

Would appreciate some honest opinions on which injectors you guys believe is "better" and your reasoning for that decision. Ive been told by slide that the Sards are only a single spray as opposed to the Nismo quad spray but im having trouble making up my mind on what to go for.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/264474-sard-or-nismo-injectors/
Share on other sites

Blue 700's (sard) are single spray, and the larger ones are dual spray... for RB26's at least

It's supposed to help with fuel atomisation or something, but i've been told that its really nothing to get excited about.

IMO for your general streeter, whatever fits your budget. Nismo's are easier to fit, Sard aren't... price is reflective of that IMO.

I know RB26's (twins sprays) you need new injector plugs too, or at least a mod... check the RB25 ones dont need that also

Maybe AFR's, but it wouldnt be huge (so little you would be hard pressed to pick it up i reckon)...

Maybe slightly better economy too, but i've really never seen some hard evidence here to back one or the other more favourably.

Everyone seems to be happy with the ones they have

I would go Nismo... ease of fitment. Thats just me.

Ive used them twice now... although i am taking the plunge soon and putting in Sards, well, im not putting them in myself this time i dont think actually.

The Nismo's i could easily do myself, i doubt the Sard's would be much more difficult however.

I think the price difference is less than $60 last time i looked so its nothing major out of $900-1k

My personal preference is Nismo. I've just seen what the shop I hang out at does, and most of the cars I've seen with Nismo injectors have had been able to run at a leaner idle, have had more consistant plug readings (color) across the set, and the used set we sent off to get flow tested were all with in 1cc of each other. I haven't seen any real bad things with the sards, it's just the few I have seen had to be run a little richer at idle than they normaly tune for, and the plugs looked a little different. Again, it's not that I've seen bad things with Sard, it's just I've been nothing but impressed with the Nismo's. I even paid for a set of new ones which are like $800 or so up here---which is saying something since I'm a cheap SOB that always tries to run ebay/second hand parts/knock off brand stuff when able.

R31Nismoid-Mate can you tell me where you have seen the Nismos for around 1k? I cant seem to find any under $1200 but maybe im not looking in the right areas :thumbsup: I shouldve grabbed some last year when they were were $870

Bloody economic meltdowns!!!!

My personal preference is Nismo. I've just seen what the shop I hang out at does, and most of the cars I've seen with Nismo injectors have had been able to run at a leaner idle, have had more consistant plug readings (color) across the set, and the used set we sent off to get flow tested were all with in 1cc of each other. I haven't seen any real bad things with the sards, it's just the few I have seen had to be run a little richer at idle than they normaly tune for, and the plugs looked a little different. Again, it's not that I've seen bad things with Sard, it's just I've been nothing but impressed with the Nismo's. I even paid for a set of new ones which are like $800 or so up here---which is saying something since I'm a cheap SOB that always tries to run ebay/second hand parts/knock off brand stuff when able.

Maybe I should send you some $$ and get you to ship some down here to Sydney...hehehe

put nismos in myne, easy to install and car ran perfectly on the same tune once i changed the settings in pfc. never had any experience with sard but as said, for the little extra go nismos if you can

i have a theory that the larger holes in the sard's make for poorer atomisation down low.... i.e. the fuel from the quad squirters is in smaller particles and can ignite easier.... hence the sards being worse on idle... and the tune having to be richer

e.g. bombtrack's car uses a LOT more fuel than mine (same mods) around town and idle, but on the GOR cruise return where we were on WOT all day we returned the same eonomy

hrm, they are back up around $1100... well, they were $1000 when i looked last :(

But prices change fairly often at the moment, not too stable... so $1200 delivered it is... fark...

Sorry, forgot to mention that was $800 USD. I'm a yank living in japan remember :(

My sards are fine, no rich idle issues and were supplied with plugs to suit - easy as. Only drama was they needed a couple of copper washers to space them off the rail as they seemed to be a few mm too short which resulted in them popping out of the manifold when it came on boost.

i have a theory that the larger holes in the sard's make for poorer atomisation down low.... i.e. the fuel from the quad squirters is in smaller particles and can ignite easier.... hence the sards being worse on idle... and the tune having to be richer

e.g. bombtrack's car uses a LOT more fuel than mine (same mods) around town and idle, but on the GOR cruise return where we were on WOT all day we returned the same eonomy

You could always bump the fuel rail pressure slightly... would help that :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...