Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Being about a month away and with all the recent pics coming out, I thought why not get a thread going :D

I think the GTR looks stunning.

post-194-1239267925_thumb.jpg

Official FIA GT Site

http://www.fiagt.com/

Here some times from the test day. 8th for the GTR which is pretty good against cars and teams that have been GT racing for many years.

1. #9 DKR Engineering - Corvette C6.R - 2:01,820

2. #4 PK Carsport - Corvette C6.R +0,111

3. #18 K plus K Motorsport - Saleen S7-R +0,465

4. #3 Selleslagh Racing Team - Corvette C6.R +0,576

5. #14 K plus K Motorsport - Saleen S7-R +0,629

6. #1 Vitaphone Racing - Maserati MC12 +1,898

7. #2 Vitaphone Racing - Saleen S7-R +2,598

8. #35 Nissan Motorsports - Nissan GT-R +3,680

9. #11 Full Speed Racing - Saleen S7-R +3,884

10. #13 Full Speed Racing - Saleen S7-R +4,856

11. #44 Matech Racing - Ford GT1 +5,816

12. #97 Brixia Racing - Porsche 997 GT3 RSR +6,379

13. #56 CRS Racing - Ferrari F430 GT2 +6,697

14. #55 CRS Racing - Ferrari F430 GT2 +6,936

15. #51 AF Corse - Ferrari F430 GT2 +7,452

16. #60 ProSpeed Competition - Porsche 997 GT3 RSR +8,326

...

20. #88 Reiter Engineering - Lamborghini Gallardo GT2 +10,914

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/264876-2009-fia-gt-championship/
Share on other sites

I thought that Nissan were running about 4 events in 2009 ahead of a full championship assault in 2010. It makes sense to me - build up reliability and speed and get a handle on the pace of the competition and your own car to build as a base for a full season's challenge.

I think the livery is a bit......'uninspired'. I much preferred the carbon fibre finish on the test car. I think something equivalent (a matt black finish) would be amazing as the race car livery.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...