Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone else get these with their cars ?

It's literally a 2-3cm what seems to be smudge mark that is almost *scratching* for lack of a better word the window when you raise/lower it.

I havent had time to pull the door card off and have a look at what might be causing it, my 2003 wrx sti had similar drama on the edge of

its window close to the A pillar but only occured 2 weeks before I sold her, so I wasnt concerned with finding a solution.

In this instance though, its starting to get annoying, considering I have a showroom condition car except for these lines that occur just past

half on the window.

Did a search and cant see anyone else experiencing it, but a lot of people dont notice it until I've had to point it out either..

Yep get that too, mainly my passenger side now, I was under the impression it was to do with when I first brought the car they detailed it a little too much getting that amoral (very greasy) stuff inside so that when the window goes up and down it leaves it's mark. Mine cleans off fine though with no remaining scratches...

Also after I got my windows tinted my side has stopped but the passenger side is still doing it!

How strange, I also have the same thing happening in my car. Occurs on my passenger side window and is easy to clean off with a wet cloth. No scratches either. Be interested to find why this is happening? Let us know if you find anything.

u know wat? i get that too! mine is like a smudge smear on the passenger side that seems to be located on the inside. i can clean it but it comes back i think from using the actual window. dunno wat to do about it =/

its a common issue with 350GT, the yanks have the same issue in their G35 too. it's caused by the window motor grease, i think u need to clean up the whole window mechanism, and re-apply the grease. it's nothing bad, it takes too much effort to pull it apart and re-grease it, i'd js leave it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Consider a 35 too...
    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 馃槂
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
  • Create New...