Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am about to take my car to Mits for emission testing soon.

I just wonder if any of you have done this before?

Will AF ratio at the Zorst affect the result? :)

What AF ratio will my car need to be to pass?

If anyone has any details or where I can get more details, please don't be shy?

Thx

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/
Share on other sites

9krpm,

Would you you mind explaining the circumstances leading up to you having a full emission test done at mitsubitshi?iIs this the result of u getting a defect and trying to clear it or are you simply trying to get your car engineered?I`m building a big KWRW motor at the moment and have contenplated having the car fully engineered with emission`s done as well.HOow and who do you contact at mitsubishi to arrange this?

Regards,

SKYLINE...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-570395
Share on other sites

Skyline, I made a few modifications to my engine and need it engineered.

That's right clint32, but the amount of gas emitted is directly related to AF ratio too ( and a number of other things). If it's too rich.....more unburnt hydrocarbon = more emission. The ideal emission would be where AF= 14.7:1. Thus NA cars are cleaner than FI cars.

What I like to know is, who has done it before? If you past the test, then what AF ratio was your car at?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-570494
Share on other sites

Danh, I spoke to Mark Tilbrook about this not too long ago.

His comments were relating to a car with a supercharger on it.

The testing was done at various rpms, and only a pass/fail result is given - that's all. They dont even tell you which rev range it failed at, or what particularly (ie how far out) failed, so if you fail you have done your 3.5K.

Wouldnt it be worth taking to NSW for testing first? Regency only require an IMO 240 (from memory) test, I am not 100% sure that the RTA test is the same, but I was told by an engineer that the NSW test was acceptable - and its free. Best part is they will tell you where and why you failed. If worse comes to worse, at least it is cheaper to get the emissions right in NSW and then take it over to mitsubishi.

There is also a guy who does a 'california bag test' or some such, I dont think regency will accept it, but it costs $350, and will also give you a good idea (within around 5% was quoted to me) of how close you are before you make your donation to the mitsubishi corporation.

Just some thoughts, oh and Mark told me they had to take the car back 3 times to get it passed. I will pm you with additional info.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-573007
Share on other sites

Another thougth, this may be overkill, but may save you a few dollars,

some car manufacturers have use air pumps to inject air into the cat, thus reducing the percentage of specific gasses - this may help in your case. Even nissan did it with the SR20. You can buy cats (holden I think) that have a port in them already ready for the injection of air, add air pump and bingo, lower emissions.

I know this is starting to get off subject a bit, I just would really hate to see you go through this absolute Bullsh1t to satisfy the men with small minds and even smaller appendages - only to get screwed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-573009
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info steve.

As I mentioned before, I have to do this as I don't like the risk of jeopardising my asset if something happen. I am doing this the hard way because I affiliate with a few ppl and can pull a few strings. I might..finger cross...... be able to get most of cost of this headache sponsored as well. The emission testing does not cost me 3.5k and I hope that the guys there do tell me what goes wrong if it fails. I think I will be working at Mits next year so they better look after me.......otherwise they will get worst treatment from me :D

I hope that most of my contacts keep their ends of the bargain otherwise I will take a trip to NSW with you. I just don't like skippies on the highway.

BTW I am still looking for the info that I promised you...I must have missed place it somewhere. Will fax that to you asap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-573087
Share on other sites

Originally posted by TIMMMAYYY

so you're a electician 9kRPM? can you wire up the computer for when i do a rb25det conversion in the 31 :)

Sorry I am not an electrician Tim. I would not even know what to do for this conversion. Love to help you with your transplant m8 but I am clueless ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-574580
Share on other sites

At work we just do a 4 gas emissions test, giving the amount of hydrocarbons parts per million, Oxygen, Carbon monoxide, and Carbon dioxide as a percentage. Once the catalytic converter has reached operating temperature, the hydrocarbon readings should come pretty close 0, if your runing too rich the hydrocarbons reading will be a lot higher so you can have it adjusted accordingly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-581102
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Steve

Danh, your going to be working at Mitsi!  Awesome, that means special deals on the emissions testing for SAU?????:(:D:D

Sorry I am now 90% certain that I won't work there :P

I will be moving to place nearby but not in Mits :P

It looks like I will have to take that road trip with you next year :)

cyrius, where do you work? Please PM me if you like to disclose that information to the public :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-581119
Share on other sites

cyrius, is the emissions test an IM240? cos that is what regency require, or at least thats what the guy I spoke to told me - you never know with that place, ask someone different and you will get a different answer every time.

Basically, I am trying to find a place in SA that regency will accept an emissions test for so I dont have to go to NSW, but with the rediculous price that Mits charge, its just so much cheaper to take a trip to NSW and get it done for free - plus they tell you where the car failed in NSW so you can rectify any shortcomings.

I just cant figure how it is helping anyone by charging so much money for a pass/fail test, and they say its in the interest of the environment - bullshit, if they were truely interested in the environment, and making cars safe on the road, they would make engineering and emissions testing something anybody could get done, ie affordable, just like they do in every other state in aust - this place is a bloody joke

Sorry, /rant.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-581215
Share on other sites

Mits is a private company and they have nothing to do with this enivironment BS. They just happen to have a machine because the EPA enforce the restriction and they like to sell cars that can comply with the restriction. Mits spent a lot of money on the testing facility and since they are the only one in SA, they can charge what ever they want. Unless your car is made by Mituhishi or you have affiliation with Mits, the penalty for the test is high. Mits are very busy too. The reason they don't tell where ppl fail and charge high price is to deter pple from getting them to carry out the test.

The blame is on the government for enforcing the EPA restrictions without having a facility accessible and affordable for the public. Legally this is incorrect and if WE lobby hard enough, they will hopefully build one.

I am really sick of this BS too. Why do we have to prove that our car meet the restriction or we get a fine? Shouldn't it be the other way around, where the government need to prove that we are "guilty" before we get charge?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26842-emission-testing/#findComment-581618
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...