Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was done speeding 36 over the limit and only got a month...then half way into that month i got done driving while suspended (by the same cop) and had to go to

court, i was giving an extra 2 months on my suspension and a $700 find...i thought the suspension time i got good on, ut the fine was a bit steep...and i had just payed my lawyer $750...ah well, ive lernt now i guess...i driv slower and shit myself wen i see cops, lol

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes, speed limits have also been designed with the worst drivers in mind, but I was always taught they covered adverse conditions too. I mean, if they didn't, then the law is effectively giving a driver permission to drive faster than is safe to do so...when we aren't allowed to do this in perfect conditions. I think you'll find that driving a car in roadworthy condition (somewhat subjective), you will be able to safely (also subjective) do the speed limit on any road in any condition unless the road has been poorly marked. The law has to account for the fact that not everyone uses common sense when driving, so not everyone is going to slow down in the wet.

Be interesting to find out exactly what criteria is used to obtain a speed limit.

That is a very dangerous and uninformed statement. The speed limit is there to state what is safe to do in ideal conditions, not what speed to do in extreme conditions.

The Great Ocean Road for example has a 100kmp/h sign on some corners that most people would struggle to do more than 40kmp/h around. Is it safe to do 100kmp/h around that corner because a sign says that you can? Hell f*cking no.

Please use a bit more common sense.

The Great Ocean Road for example has a 100kmp/h sign on some corners that most people would struggle to do more than 40kmp/h around. Is it safe to do 100kmp/h around that corner because a sign says that you can? Hell f*cking no.

Please use a bit more common sense.

While the speed limit might be 100 for those types of roads in some areas, there are also heaps of signs that advise which speed to do for the type of corner coming up. Anyone that completely ignores those deserve what they get. In some places there are also signs that state slippery when wet, slippery when icy (or whatever) etc.

I'm pretty certain that everyone here appreciates the signs that tell them the suggested speed and what type of corner is coming up so I don't think it's fair of you to say "use a bit more common sense".

End of the day, ideally, all drivers should know their car's limits and the conditions that they are driving in and drive to accommodate for that. A good example for most of you here is speed humps, they might say 20km/h but for some of you that would cause you to hit your head. :D

I've seen some roads around the Barwon Heads/PointLonsdale/Queenscliffe area that were posted around 80kph which should probably be posted as 60kph at the most. I'm not sure how the speed limits are set, but clearly there are some speed limits which make you wonder about the government and the authorities in charge of our roads.

That is a very dangerous and uninformed statement. The speed limit is there to state what is safe to do in ideal conditions, not what speed to do in extreme conditions.

The Great Ocean Road for example has a 100kmp/h sign on some corners that most people would struggle to do more than 40kmp/h around. Is it safe to do 100kmp/h around that corner because a sign says that you can? Hell f*cking no.

Please use a bit more common sense.

No no, you're misinformed. Read my post again, particularly the part you decided to highlight. Do you know what the word subjective means? And are you familiar with the context I used it in...twice?

Also note this part of a post that I made not long after: "It would be different if there was ice or oil or snow on the road". That's the sound of me conceding that there are some extreme conditions for which I would expect to be fined for when sticking to the speed limit throughout. You make it sound like I would ignore the fact that my car is losing traction, provided I am under the speed limit...which is just ridiculous...who would? Not only this, but I finished my post with a statement implying uncertainty as to how exactly a speed limit is decided upon. I don't need to be told I'm misinformed when I've shown evidence of second guessing my knowledge anyway.

Just as the law accounts for it, you too need to remember that there are ALOT of drivers out there who will stick to the speed limit no matter the conditions. I believe speed limits are designed conservatively for this reason. If you give the people written permission to do something, many will. We have had many a decrease in speed limit for built up and non-built up areas here in Victoria. Has the road toll decreased since the inception of these decreases? Nope; the original speed limits were conservative to begin with. Speed camera revenue sure has gone up though.

As for the Great Ocean Road, there are MANY signs suggesting a slower speed than 100km/h on corners. Did you not see/read these last time you drove down it? That to me is common sense.

P.S. Well said rh1n0 :D

Edited by Birds

Its good to know the OP learnt from his mistakes - as most of us have.

In terms of the driving under the limit thing I live in Tasmania which has a (mostly) crappy population but some of Australias best driving roads around the corner from my back door. The speed limit on them is 110 kph mostly. I would say on a bright sunny day with perfect road conditions plus zero traffic you couldn't do the speed limit without, say, an R34 Z tune and gentlemen Jim driving for you and EVEN THEN I doubt its possible - some of the linked hairpins are insane off camber, uphill, narrow, blind corners that frequently have trucks travelling in the opposite direction.

Have seen many a car with victorian number plates/inexperienced/people from hobart who have never seen a windy road in ditches....

Drive to the conditions and all that crap.

As for the Great Ocean Road, there are MANY signs suggesting a slower speed than 100km/h on corners. Did you not see/read these last time you drove down it? That to me is common sense.

Yes, I've seen those signs. There's also a number of areas where there is no suggested speed for an up-coming corner.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...