Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I didn't even know there is a manual ecu. So AutoTrust did you just did a swap with the gearbox's ecu?? Sorry dude just a bit confused.

Apprantely there is a problem with the PFC not communicating properly the TPS and something else across to the auto ecu.

I just brought myself an e-manage. Haven't install it yet but will keep you guys posted. That is why I started this thread, to find out if anyone else here have one installed already.

All the ones you mentions are the only ones I know. We don't have much choice to we. Bit sad considering the FASTERS WREX IS AN AUTO!! hehe :(

OK hehe I was a bit confused about what AutoTrust post. I though he swaped the gearbox's ecu, but he just swapped the main car's ecu to run with the auto's ecu.

AutoTrust you mention that your manual ecu is modified. How?

I know that the R32 can be chiped and stuff but I have heard nothing for the R33.

I "think" that the Nissan engine ECU's send / push / relay info on certain pins.

These pins are connected to electronic stuff inside the shiny box in Nissan ECU's...

They aren't on Apexi ECU's...

All guessing though as I haven't tried it... For all I know there may not even be a problem...

I read that other thread and now my head hurts! What happened was I was complaining to the boys at J-spec about my computer not letting me run increased boost, Craig said here try this it's a modified Ecu out of my last car, I then pulled the covers off and looked around inside to find an extra circuit board and EPROM ..very interesting. Then i removed the standard auto ECU from my auto 33 and looked inside to find it had an extra chip when compared to a standard manual ecu. I then found some pin out info on the r33 and found that the auto uses more pins, that in turn run to the other side of the car to the auto control unit.........It was a little daunting but I just plugged the modded manual ecu in and drove the sucker around the block... all seemed well. then on my way home i pulled up occasionally and dialled the boost up a notch or two to find that it went faster and faster without me eating steering wheel!! (no fuel cut). Now the only problem i have is that the boost leaks off down to 0.5. So now i need the money for an electronic boost controller. (any body need an alarm)?!!! As for the 34 ... keep us all posted skylineakt hope you have a win with the e-manage :(

That is very interesting. People reckons that the R33 ecu can't be chipped properly. But by the sound of it your's has been chipped. I know some people will actually swap R32 ecu over so they can chip it.

I need some money too before I can install my e-manage. I spoke to guys from BMT and everything sounds pretty positive at the moment.

The ECU in my car was modded in japan, I just got lucky I suppose. I'm focussing on getting my impul body kit fitted, then boost controller then interior etc. etc. and hopefully without the missus noticing too much!! eventually i would like a manual conversion cos autos are scary sideways!!

I think it's safe to say that even the cheapest option (2nd hand blue screen version 1 S-AFC) is good for 20-30rwkw or more on a stock or mildly modded Skyline (one guy recently got +60!). What's more important though is the shape of the power curve, the amount of power available down low and in mid range, response of the throttle, etc.

My S-AFC gave me +30rwkw on its last tune. However it was entirely useless because after 5000rpm or so I got 2 mammoth dips in power, due to what I believe (and hope) was boost cut. I had a Fuel Cut Defender in the car but it wasn't wired up!

I'm guessing the E-manage is more than capable of helping with all the above, but how well it does it compared with say, a PowerFC or Wolf would determine if it's good value or not.

Although with an auto box your choices are somewhat more limited and the E-manage may be the best choice because of this. Even though it's more costly than an S-AFC2, it would have to be a better (but more expensive) option due to the extra harnesses.

I find that the E-manage is getting cheaper and cheaper. Not sure if it is because of our $$ curency or that no one buying it.

I think you can get a bargain E-manage if you are lucky. Like I got mine with all the optional harness for $550 brand new.

S-AFC2 the cheapest I have seen is about $450 so for an $100 bucks extra I think it was worth it.

In term of tuning, if the e-manage can handle the ignition harness with the auto box, I will be able to modify the ignition controls as well. Plus more points to play with than the SAFC2 on the fuel curve. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...