Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

An R34 RB25 det neo can take 300 KWATW before the internals need to be done an R33 can take around 250-270 before the internals need changing. it all depends on the turbo ur getting some turbos can produce 220 at the rears on only 9 PSI like mine which is An r34 turbo which has been changed from busshel to ball-bering and hi-flow.

im running a standard engine except for a race head gasket and around 1 bar on the lower map which gives me 400bhp and 1.2bar on top map which gives me 549bhp. It gets thrashed every time i use it and its absolutely cracking.

An R34 RB25 det neo can take 300 KWATW before the internals need to be done an R33 can take around 250-270 before the internals need changing. it all depends on the turbo ur getting some turbos can produce 220 at the rears on only 9 PSI like mine which is An r34 turbo which has been changed from busshel to ball-bering and hi-flow.

I've seen a few R34's with over 350rwk running stock internal, don't ask me how but..

But yeah do a search dude.

mate, boost has nothing to do with it (well, it does, but not like you think).

For example, you can run 14psi boost from your stock turbo pretty safely, however, if you fit a T88 turbo on your engine and run 14PSI, your engine will most likely die.

For this reason, people usually base how safe internals are based on power.

I've found that the internals of a RB25 engine are generally safe between 250-280 rwkw, providing you have a nice tune without any detonation over 50.

Cheers

couldnt have said it any better turbz lol some ppl on here offer horrible advice!

all comes down to the power your making on what boost levels, and how healthy your motor is to start with and how good your tune is.

mite last 1 day or 3yrs all depends on alot of things.

mate, boost has nothing to do with it (well, it does, but not like you think).

For example, you can run 14psi boost from your stock turbo pretty safely, however, if you fit a T88 turbo on your engine and run 14PSI, your engine will most likely die.

You're right, boost isn't everything (I wouldn't say nothing by any stretch of the imagination) but I would be far more confident of running a T88 on the side of my stock engine at 1bar than a stock turbo. The T88 will have far lower turbine pressure and heat from an overworked compressor than a stock turbo and will not magically make stupid power just because a T88 is a big turbo, the big power numbers on low boost seen on some engines running T88s are partly as a result of the big cams and revs that the engine has been built to use to rev high enough to justify the bigger compressor.

i wouldnt say 14psi is safe for a stock turbo though. That wont effect the internals but the turbo def wont last

Yeah it can have an effect on the engine in the relative scheme of things, the turbine housing and wheel are TINY and at that boost level the pressure and heat in there will go through the roof. That ends up with a much higher chance of reversion, and reversion raises the cylinder temperatures something crazy - high cylinder temps are what increase detonation and ultimately can speed up the wear and tear of the engine.

I partly upgraded my turbo as I wanted to go a bit quicker but was already at 10-11psi on the stocker, as far as I am concerned running >250kw @ wheels on a big turbo on 1bar is FAR nicer on the engine than running just over 200rwkw on the stock turbo on the same boost level despite the higher power level. You would be surprised at how little extra force is put on the bottom end by running a decent matched turbo on 1bar with a good tune versus the stock turbo on similar boost, if not a bit less.

Making more power on the 1bar with a decent turbo using the standard rev limit and good tune is the definition of having your cake and eating it too with an RB25DET, if you are looking for a bit more power out of your stock internals.

Just my opinion, anyway.

Edited by Lithium
I've seen a few R34's with over 350rwk running stock internal, don't ask me how but..

But yeah do a search dude.

'

Ye thats true. 300kwatw is the safe mark this is what i was told by several tuners here in VIC how ever one of the tuners had tuned an r34 gtt to just over 340 @ the rears on stock internals.

Please use the search.

There was a topic on this late last week, and another about a week earlier.

Keeping info/posts to one/two threads makes the longer term better when people search and find detailed threads with lots of history/info.

You can always make a number, however how long it lasts is another question

Thanks.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...